I just stumbled across this article with video that demonstrates the ability to refocus your photos after the fact. I can only imagine what the prefinished photo size could be.
tbreak.com - Penoptic Lens![]()
robbug Member 212 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Oct 07, 2010 17:16 | #1 I just stumbled across this article with video that demonstrates the ability to refocus your photos after the fact. I can only imagine what the prefinished photo size could be. Refractive Photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vladimer Senior Member 634 posts Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Alberta, Canada More info | Oct 07, 2010 17:36 | #2 https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=935670
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 17:43 | #3 That is pretty exciting..... Ann Robinson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
atc Member 74 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada More info | Oct 11, 2010 14:51 | #4 I was also pretty interested in this technology, and I found a company that makes these Plenoptic cameras. Its called Raytrix, and you can buy one of their cameras, or send your own in. I don't know if this technology is feasible yet, i'm guessing 5-7 years down the road. Canon 7D, 5D | Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Rokinon 8mm f/3.5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nathan Can you repeat the question, please? More info | Oct 13, 2010 10:16 | #5 What are the 4 dimensions the article describes? Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Oct 18, 2010 01:40 | #6 So how big would a 70-200mm f2.8L with 15 different light paths, be? How many sensors would I need? Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lonelyjew Goldmember 1,411 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2008 More info | Oct 18, 2010 12:17 | #7 This doesn't seem terribly practical to me. I think it'd be easier to just program a camera/lens to take multiple exposures at different focal points, on a tripod. Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Socket7 Member 120 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Massachusetts More info | Oct 22, 2010 12:47 | #8 lonelyjew wrote in post #11119559 This doesn't seem terribly practical to me. I think it'd be easier to just program a camera/lens to take multiple exposures at different focal points, on a tripod. It is impractical, but with our current system it's impossible to take multiple exposures at different focal points at the same instant, which is important for shooting anything that moves. The Fool on the hill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 09, 2010 17:26 | #9 Imagine being able to shoot landscapes and macros at f/8, instead of having to stop down any further for increased depth of field... in medium format! No more diffraction worries there!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PurplePuppy Senior Member 284 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Vancouver More info | Nov 14, 2010 04:46 | #10 In addition, with plenoptic cameras, you can have true tilt-shift methods in postproduction, and decrease DOF; and through zbuffer calculations, it may also be possible to have more sophisticated selective colouring and probably some other things. Canon EOS Rebel XS | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC | Tair 11a (135mm f/2.8, M42, manual) | Cheapo aluminum tripod from dealextreme.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lowner "I'm the original idiot" 12,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Salisbury, UK. More info | Nov 15, 2010 16:14 | #11 Am I right in assuming that the focus changes are possible because the originals have vitually unlimited DoF and the areas not wanted sharp are simply blurred by the software? I cannot imagine any other way of doing it. Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 15, 2010 17:06 | #12 Lowner wrote in post #11289654 Am I right in assuming that the focus changes are possible because the originals have vitually unlimited DoF and the areas not wanted sharp are simply blurred by the software? I cannot imagine any other way of doing it. Not quite.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djentley Senior Member 386 posts Joined Sep 2010 More info | Nov 17, 2010 06:35 | #13 Who wants to bet people will still complain their copy front/rear focuses? My 500px.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Quaz8r Member 142 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Sacramento, Ca More info | Nov 17, 2010 20:23 | #14 It is crazy to see where the DSLR has come in the last few years. I wonder what we will be using in twenty years? Tech like this is just the antithesis of where we are going.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Nov 18, 2010 16:54 | #15 Quaz8r wrote in post #11303685 It is crazy to see where the DSLR has come in the last few years. I wonder what we will be using in twenty years? Tech like this is just the antithesis of where we are going.
Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1675 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||