Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 09 Oct 2010 (Saturday) 03:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CC Please, be greatly appreciated!!

 
monicaholloway
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Oct 09, 2010 03:27 |  #1

Ok, bare with me please this is my first time posting on here.
But would like to get cc on this image. I'm kinda proud of it. For the longest time I had the hardest time getting a group shot & everyone be equally in focus. I believe I nailed it on this one.. Thanx everyone for checking it out.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Content warning: data


(DUPLICATE IMAGE)
(DUPLICATE IMAGE)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
patishandsfree
Member
69 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Newcastle, England
     
Oct 09, 2010 03:56 |  #2

Yes I believe you have, you should be very proud, great image


www.philnunez.com (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rox1e6
Senior Member
Avatar
288 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: The Fens...UK
     
Oct 09, 2010 10:14 |  #3

Lovely group shot but... it looks (to my eye) like you've overdone the pp on the skin smoothing and eye enhancing...especially on the little girl. Great focus and dof tho :)


De
2 x 40D, 24-105L, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 : Sigma 30mm f1.4 : Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS : 430EXII
flickr (external link) Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Oct 09, 2010 12:24 as a reply to  @ rox1e6's post |  #4

Well done.I like it....just be careful of the crop, she is pretty close to the side, and when framed, you might clip her.


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monicaholloway
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Oct 11, 2010 01:19 |  #5

Thanks so much everyone!! I will take all of your comments into consideration..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimMcrae
Senior Member
Avatar
938 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Edinburgh
     
Oct 11, 2010 08:06 |  #6

A really nice shot but would maybe be even better if 'mum' had moved in a bit closer to eliminate that wee gap? I'm just nit-picking... :)


60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yusef
Senior Member
677 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Oct 11, 2010 08:16 |  #7

two thumbs up. great shot




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benji
Goldmember
2,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North east Indiana
     
Oct 11, 2010 19:33 |  #8

This is the critique forum is it not?

Positive critique. Everyone is in focus. Good expressions.

Constructive critique. Dad has his head tipped to the feminine shoulder. Two heads stacked. Lighting is "everywhere light" coming from both sides and overhead, which is not portrait lighting. Raccoon eyes on everyone. No forethought to matching their clothing. Pose makes it look like the parents are fighting.

Changes next time. Put mom and dad in the center with their torso's posed at a 45° angle toward one another with all their weight on the rear foot/hip. Place one child at each end both at a 45° angle to the camera and facing in toward the center. There will be no heads stacked this way, and you will have a nice pyramidal composition. Use an off camera flash to create some directional lighting. Tip all heads in toward the center. Have a clothing consultation with mom.

Benji




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mltn
Senior Member
353 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 50
Joined Sep 2010
     
Oct 11, 2010 21:29 |  #9

Nice picture, I agree that the mom should be a little tighter with the group.

The DOF works really well here as well.

That watermark has to go though, it looks like you have a special logo for Halloween or something. Watermarks don't need to be complicated, and they don't need any photoshop effects. They need to say your name, but not take away from the picture. This one is just sooo loud, and thematically doesn't fit with this kind of work at all.

If you are going to use a free font from the internet, and there are many good ones to chose from, pick something inconspicuous, but professional looking, you don't need anything so ornate.

There are many good ones here:

http://psdfan.com …t-free-fonts-of-all-time/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yusef
Senior Member
677 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Oct 12, 2010 08:27 |  #10

Benji wrote in post #11078005 (external link)
This is the critique forum is it not?

Positive critique. Everyone is in focus. Good expressions.

Constructive critique. Dad has his head tipped to the feminine shoulder. Two heads stacked. Lighting is "everywhere light" coming from both sides and overhead, which is not portrait lighting. Raccoon eyes on everyone. No forethought to matching their clothing. Pose makes it look like the parents are fighting.

Changes next time. Put mom and dad in the center with their torso's posed at a 45° angle toward one another with all their weight on the rear foot/hip. Place one child at each end both at a 45° angle to the camera and facing in toward the center. There will be no heads stacked this way, and you will have a nice pyramidal composition. Use an off camera flash to create some directional lighting. Tip all heads in toward the center. Have a clothing consultation with mom.

Benji

A lot of things I wouldn't have considered until you mentioned it. That's what I like about coming here, you never know what you don't know.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thetathink
Member
Avatar
194 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Oct 12, 2010 10:35 |  #11

Looks good, my only crit is the pp on the little girl is WAY overdone. She looks fake.


portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kumsa
Member
Avatar
234 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Oct 12, 2010 12:17 as a reply to  @ Benji's post |  #12

Benji, you nailed it. The expressions and focus let the photo be usable, but your suggestions would have transformed it into a keepsake.


EOS R / 6D / Canon 35 f2 IS USM / Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 / Sigma 70-200 2.8 / Sigma Tele 2.x / Canon EF 17-40mm f4L / Canon RF 85 f2 / Orlit Strobes / Pixma Pro-100 / Epson P800 / ColorMunki / Tokina 100mm AT-X M100 AF PRO D / CaptureOne / GIMP / DarkTable / Zerene Stacker
https://mynameisjack.p​hotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Oct 18, 2010 00:08 as a reply to  @ Kumsa's post |  #13

Benji has a fantastic write-up about portrait posing. It is well worth the read. He touches on so many things that are overlooked, feminine/masculine head tilt, hand placement and no armpits.

OP: While I can't improve on what Benji and others have said, I'll throw in my penny's worth. The lighting is off. The husband is overly dark/red and the others are too white. Yes, this may be complexion, but it seems off.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NG7 ­ Photo
Member
Avatar
166 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 18, 2010 00:17 |  #14

Nice shot, I think all of the technical points have been discussed but one..... and it's a personal pet peeve of mine... Please ditch the "Bleeding Cowboy" font for your watermark, that is one of the most overused fonts to date. It also screams unprofessional pretty loudly.


flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mltn
Senior Member
353 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 50
Joined Sep 2010
     
Oct 18, 2010 00:32 |  #15

xluckynumber7x wrote in post #11116875 (external link)
Nice shot, I think all of the technical points have been discussed but one..... and it's a personal pet peeve of mine... Please ditch the "Bleeding Cowboy" font for your watermark, that is one of the most overused fonts to date. It also screams unprofessional pretty loudly.

I mentioned that, I'm glad I'm not the only one who is bothered by the font selection!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,914 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
CC Please, be greatly appreciated!!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2723 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.