Canon vs Nikon (3)

vipergts831 wrote in post #11082129
I used to be like that as well. Until the iphone

the problem is I will never know until I spend $600 to use it... and I don't think I'll risk that hehe anyway I am happy with my cheap BB for now

jdizzle wrote in post #11082139
The Zeiss 100 MP blows that 100 L to bits. Just sayin'...

While true it would mean I would have to go entirely Zeiss for consistency. I hate trying to grade footage from two different sources especially when the lens variations are so huge (Zeiss has very strong colours compared to EF lenses).

smcclelland wrote in post #11082162
While true it would mean I would have to go entirely Zeiss for consistency. I hate trying to grade footage from two different sources especially when the lens variations are so huge (Zeiss has very strong colours compared to EF lenses).

Why do you need to go all Zeiss? You can have differrent bits in your collection.

Its almost midnight here and I can't sleep coz I am watching a UFC replay of Rashad and Rampage...and I am waiting for this to finish to get my new lappy

^I see what you're trying to do. What combo of the Zeiss would you buy?

jdizzle wrote in post #11082174
Why do you need to go all Zeiss? You can have differrent bits in your collection.

For stills yeah but I've got some plans to do some video recording soon and I'd rather not have to sit there for hours trying to grade colours to match precisely I'm lazy like that heh.

jdizzle wrote in post #11082186
^I see what you're trying to do. What combo of the Zeiss would you buy?

Probably the 50 and the 100. I'd buy them all if the wive wasn't so skilled at chopping things with knives.

smcclelland wrote in post #11082217
Probably the 50 and the 100. I'd buy them all if the wive wasn't so skilled at chopping things with knives.

Hehe! Which 50? The 1.4 or the MP f/2? Thinking of picking up the 50 1.4 just for kicks.

jdizzle wrote in post #11082231
Hehe! Which 50? The 1.4 or the MP f/2? Thinking of picking up the 50 1.4 just for kicks.

I'm in the same boat. Not sure I'd ever really need the macro on a 50mm lens and the 50 1.4 is significantly cheaper than the MP version.

smcclelland wrote in post #11081577
Just what I wanted to open my laptop in the morning to... a picture of Stealthy staring right at me.

I need more coffee.

hahaha, thats what I thought when I saw it

smcclelland wrote in post #11081881
Quiet this morning... I'm sitting here staring at the EF 100L and the Zeiss 100 f2 MP trying to decide if I want to stay with an all EF line-up or go with more Zeiss glass.

droooooool.....go Zeiss

jdizzle wrote in post #11082076
I'm going to have diarrhea!!

TF!!!!

since when did POTN become twitter??

smcclelland wrote in post #11082248
I'm in the same boat. Not sure I'd ever really need the macro on a 50mm lens and the 50 1.4 is significantly cheaper than the MP version.

If you check out Denoir's shots, he says the 50 MP isn't good for portraiture. I would definitely go for the 1.4 instead.

vipergts831 wrote in post #11082103
Thats why i love my iphone 4. Great camera for a phone.

It is quite a god camera, he should sell the rest of his gear, the Iphone is better than the Noink:p:p

jdizzle wrote in post #11082139
The Zeiss 100 MP blows that 100 L to bits. Just sayin'...

not in AF and IS :p

smcclelland wrote in post #11082217
Probably the 50 and the 100. I'd buy them all if the wive wasn't so skilled at chopping things with knives.

hahaha

KCY wrote in post #11082285
It is quite a god camera, he should sell the rest of his gear, the Iphone is better than the Noink:p:p

I agree on this point

jdizzle wrote in post #11082284
If you check out Denoir's shots, he says the 50 MP isn't good for portraiture. I would definitely go for the 1.4 instead.

Yeah I was leaning towards the 1.4 as it's half the price of the 50MP here in Canada and the 100MP is going to cost me about $1850 CDN. Might as well spend my winter bonus on something.