Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 11 Oct 2010 (Monday) 10:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Notice... don't give your photos away

 
PeaceFire
Goldmember
Avatar
2,281 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
     
Oct 12, 2010 12:10 |  #16

Interesting. I mostly deglect my FB page since it never seemed to do anything for me. Maybe I just need to spend more time with it.

ETA: I noticed that when uploading pictures for my regular FB page there was a "Standard" upload and a "High Resolution" upload option. Does anyone know if Facebook automatically resizes hi-res images unless the hi-res option is selected?


My Gear List / My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Oct 12, 2010 15:09 |  #17

PeaceFire wrote in post #11082787 (external link)
Interesting. I mostly deglect my FB page since it never seemed to do anything for me. Maybe I just need to spend more time with it.

The key to getting your FB page to work is tagging. It is, however, (at least for me) a challenge to get the couple or others to come and do it.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flores
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2010
Location: TEXAS
     
Oct 12, 2010 15:21 |  #18

will continue to resize and degrade slightly before uploading to facebook. not a problem here.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Oct 15, 2010 01:43 |  #19

I offer a package where my clients can buy a DVD of high rez images. One client this past summer did just that. In a few weeks I got an email from her (I could tell from the email that it had been sent to her entire address book), asking me to join Facebook so I could look at 'her' wedding photos! I looked at them and, sure enough, they were mine. I've always been aware of this problem (and still manage to sell prints through my online store all the time), but this was the first time a bride has ever had the temerity to ask me directly to look at images that I hold the copyright to. When I replied to her, in a nice way, she had no idea that posting such images was illegal. And indeed it may not be for long. Facebook has a lot of money and those with lots of money tend to get public opinion, then legislation, to go their way. The solution? Jack up the price for the high-rez DVDs.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaycky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,089 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bancouver okanagan alberta
     
Oct 15, 2010 02:00 |  #20

PhotoMatte wrote in post #11100423 (external link)
I offer a package where my clients can buy a DVD of high rez images. One client this past summer did just that. In a few weeks I got an email from her (I could tell from the email that it had been sent to her entire address book), asking me to join Facebook so I could look at 'her' wedding photos! I looked at them and, sure enough, they were mine. I've always been aware of this problem (and still manage to sell prints through my online store all the time), but this was the first time a bride has ever had the temerity to ask me directly to look at images that I hold the copyright to. When I replied to her, in a nice way, she had no idea that posting such images was illegal. And indeed it may not be for long. Facebook has a lot of money and those with lots of money tend to get public opinion, then legislation, to go their way. The solution? Jack up the price for the high-rez DVDs.

interesting


5DM2 /grip Lots Of L's
measurbating f-stops
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/52633882@N07/ (external link)
http://about.me/jbmpho​tos (external link)
http://photobyfish.tum​blr.com/archive (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sctbiggs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,793 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Oct 15, 2010 07:14 |  #21

PhotoMatte wrote in post #11100423 (external link)
I offer a package where my clients can buy a DVD of high rez images. One client this past summer did just that. In a few weeks I got an email from her (I could tell from the email that it had been sent to her entire address book), asking me to join Facebook so I could look at 'her' wedding photos! I looked at them and, sure enough, they were mine. I've always been aware of this problem (and still manage to sell prints through my online store all the time), but this was the first time a bride has ever had the temerity to ask me directly to look at images that I hold the copyright to. When I replied to her, in a nice way, she had no idea that posting such images was illegal. And indeed it may not be for long. Facebook has a lot of money and those with lots of money tend to get public opinion, then legislation, to go their way. The solution? Jack up the price for the high-rez DVDs.

that hadn't even crossed my mind yet... will definitely have to address with clients.


Baby Girl 2.0 has arrived!
Facebook (external link) | Wilmington, NC Wedding and Portrait Photographers (external link) - The seriously outdated website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Oct 15, 2010 22:17 |  #22

I think this is the only way to stay ahead of the game. Once we release the photos in any format, they're fair game for piracy (kind of why Adobe products cost so much, IMHO). If they've already paid a premium for their images they might also be less likely to share them for free, so it's a win-win!


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigrob
Goldmember
Avatar
1,431 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
     
Oct 19, 2010 16:47 |  #23

I'm afraid a lot of people don't care.

There's a chap in my son's rugby team who has four photos on his Facebook that have a watermark on that says "It is illegal to download this photo".

I just found this out after reading this thread and doing a quick search.

See here if you're on FB http://www.facebook.co​m …18994111.288534​.629889111 (external link)


_______________
1Dx, 1D4, 70D, G9, 400/2.8 IS, 70-200/2.8 II, 24-105/4, 20-35/2.8
http://photoshotz.co.u​k/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 19, 2010 16:57 |  #24

A lot of people assume that because they are in the photo it is their photo.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billo78
Senior Member
Avatar
351 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide - South Australia
     
Oct 21, 2010 00:24 |  #25

PhotoMatte wrote in post #11100423 (external link)
I offer a package where my clients can buy a DVD of high rez images. One client this past summer did just that. In a few weeks I got an email from her (I could tell from the email that it had been sent to her entire address book), asking me to join Facebook so I could look at 'her' wedding photos! I looked at them and, sure enough, they were mine. I've always been aware of this problem (and still manage to sell prints through my online store all the time), but this was the first time a bride has ever had the temerity to ask me directly to look at images that I hold the copyright to. When I replied to her, in a nice way, she had no idea that posting such images was illegal. And indeed it may not be for long. Facebook has a lot of money and those with lots of money tend to get public opinion, then legislation, to go their way. The solution? Jack up the price for the high-rez DVDs.

You're kidding, right? Your client wants to show off your photos to hundreds of potential cilents and you hit them with talk of illegal activity? Why on earth wouldn't you want your photos to be seen by as many people as possible? After a wedding I upload a selection of discretely watermarked images to my FB business page and tag the couple in, you cannot get better free advertising. Then you get people commenting and liking photos and their friends see that they've commented and it's all happy times.

OF COURSE a bride is going to call them 'her' photos, it's her day and you're the guy she paid to cover it, it would be ridiculous for her to say "Here are my photographer's photos guys!"

You can't fight Facebook, not should you want to, this is the best facilitator of word of mouth advertising that's ever existed, I just don't understand some people. Worst case scenario you lose out on a few low value sales to guests, best case scenario you book a bunch of high value weddings out of it.


Photography Blog (external link)
Adelaide Based Wedding Photographer (external link)

Gear: 5D2, 40D, 580 EX II, 430 EX II, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 18-200 OS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Looony2nz
Member
Avatar
162 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: South Florida
     
Oct 21, 2010 07:46 |  #26

when you upload your pics to FB, they compress them, so I find that if I downsize my pics first, then upload to FB, they don't always look good and I hate to put crappy looking pics on FB....so...I guess if they are that desperate to download a watermarked pic from FB, then so be it :) <wink>




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
japollner
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Oct 22, 2010 08:00 |  #27

When I export from Photoshop, I always make sure to do a quick resize to 720px on the long side, and add "web" to the file name.

Makes it easy for people to know which to print out and which go on their facebooks. Though I still get calls every now and then saying that the prints are "all funny looking.... OH! I needed to print the ones without web, ok."


Canon 7d - Meike LCD Grip - Canon 50 f1.8 - Tamron 17-50 f2.8 - Sigma 24-60 f2.8 - Canon 70-200 f4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cgardinerphotos
Member
34 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Okanagan, BC
     
Mar 04, 2011 00:08 |  #28

Ya I have done this for a long time luckily. created a 'facebook' export preset in lightroom. it keeps everything at 700 on the long edge at maximum. and everything gets watermarked for facebook too. good habit to get into!


50D | XTi
24-105f/4L||70-200f/4L||EF-S10-22||50f/1.8||28f/2.8||18-55&75-300 Kit Lens||
580exII||2xViv285HV||
My DOT CA (external link) ||Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ of ­ Cornubia
Senior Member
459 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Oztralia
     
Mar 04, 2011 00:24 as a reply to  @ cgardinerphotos's post |  #29

Simple. Stay off Facebook.

OK, that's easy for a 50-something like me, not so easy for the online generation, but I only see risk. The identity-thieves out there are having a bonanza, thanks to social networking sites. Some of them are really quite clever, and you'd be amazed at what they can harvest from just a few sites - your name, age, gender, where you live, what you look like, where you work, the name of your spouse - even your dog's name. You might think, "it's alright. My info is spread around." but these people are like detectives - they look you up, then your friends, then your workmates pages..........Armed with this information and a bit of criminal guile, they CAN impersonate you.

So, if you're going to use social networking sites, just bear this well-intentioned advice in mind. Then write it off as the ridiculous imaginings of a stupid old fart. At your peril (cue fiendish movie laugh).


5D MK3, 7D, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 16-35mm f/2.8L, EF 1.4x TC MKIII, Nissin Di866 II, Nissin Di466
I hate being bipolar. It's great.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeaceFire
Goldmember
Avatar
2,281 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
     
Mar 04, 2011 01:19 |  #30

If you're always worried about that you may as well live in a hole and never leave, let alone have a business that deals with people on almost a daily basis. I am not concerned by the whole Facebook thing, still. What I do now (something I've changed since this thread started) is have the high res images then make a separate folder and resize all images to 700 on the long edge and slap my logo on that. I then reduce the quality to 60. This helps make it almost impossible to print and also loads WAY faster! Poof, problem solved. No need to freak out about it and stop using what is likely to become the most valuable resources for not just photographers but almost every other business and business owner available. And best of all- it's FREE!

I'm not really sure how having a Fan Page for my photography company is going to lead to anyone knowing my dogs name or who my friends are. Heck, it won't even tell you what my real name is or list the people who like my page anymore. I think you're confusing a Fan Page with a Personal Page and these are two very different things.


My Gear List / My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,204 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Notice... don't give your photos away
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is rickldewitt
1019 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.