Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 11 Oct 2010 (Monday) 11:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best method to archive photos???

 
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 871
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Mar 19, 2012 09:01 |  #46

Another example of the advantage of low-tech / low-maintenance technology: recently I transferred a whole bunch of 40 years old 8mm home films made by my father - quality wasn't great (mostly because the original quality wasn't professional to start with), but otherwise it worked out pretty well, and now we have priceless family videos in our archive. (It is digitized and backed up - but who knows, may be in 30 years it will be easier to re-scan the original 8mm films than to recover my digital archives :) ).


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,374 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Mar 19, 2012 10:19 |  #47

Wilt wrote in post #14108252 (external link)
I will agree, that with equal motivation, our heirs are more likely to page thru digital files than leaf thru boxes, simply due to relative ease of using electronic viewers than leaf thru stacks of photos in boxes -- after all, the each generation goes after ease over quality (witness MP-3 vs. CD, cell phone cameras vs. even P&S, ease of distributing digital cinema in spite of its poor resolution of under 4 pixels per inch on the theater screen). But it is inherently easier to open a box to discover the contents are full of photos, than to find a collection of old harddrives and figure out how to plug them in to make them work...even a grade school dropout can open a box and leaf thru photos. Heck, I have old floppies that can be read in USB floppy drives, but I don't bother to plug them in and see what files are on them, beyond reading the handwritten paper label...I'm admittedly too lazy and too busy to take the time!

I said before:

Even today, the chances of my son or daughter reviewing my images after my death will be far greater if they are in up-to-date digital format than if they are in boxes.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Photographer_Canadian
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Apr 21, 2012 12:09 as a reply to  @ RDKirk's post |  #48

There is a simple solution, if you are archiving to CD/DVD-R's. Then archive a CD/DVD drive with it in case in the future they stop producing them, :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 21, 2012 12:13 |  #49

Photographer_Canadian wrote in post #14303586 (external link)
There is a simple solution, if you are archiving to CD/DVD-R's. Then archive a CD/DVD drive with it in case in the future they stop producing them, :)

You have to hope that future PCs even have a compatible connection for the old CD/DVD player. Even the ubiquitous USB port is likely to one day disappear with advancements in connection port technology.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lsquare
Goldmember
1,933 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
     
Apr 21, 2012 13:39 |  #50

Wilt wrote in post #14303602 (external link)
You have to hope that future PCs even have a compatible connection for the old CD/DVD player. Even the ubiquitous USB port is likely to one day disappear with advancements in connection port technology.

Agreed. Nothing last forever. Technology changes fast and I wouldn't be surprised if there is a new standard interface introduced sometime during this decade.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Apr 21, 2012 14:17 |  #51

Wilt wrote in post #14303602 (external link)
You have to hope that future PCs even have a compatible connection for the old CD/DVD player. Even the ubiquitous USB port is likely to one day disappear with advancements in connection port technology.

lsquare wrote in post #14303976 (external link)
Agreed. Nothing last forever. Technology changes fast and I wouldn't be surprised if there is a new standard interface introduced sometime during this decade.

Without a doubt, however with the introduction and industry wide acceptance (except from Apple of course who still wont give its owners Blu-Ray) USB 3.0 will probably take us to the end of the decade.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 21, 2012 14:25 |  #52

ben_r_ wrote in post #14304120 (external link)
Without a doubt, however with the introduction and industry wide acceptance (except from Apple of course who still wont give its owners Blu-Ray) USB 3.0 will probably take us to the end of the decade.

The primary principal is NOT the longevity of any specific standard, but the concept of inevitability that all standards come to an end, and then the devices which were supported by that standard might become useless pieces of hardware, relative our reading data recorded to be readable by said devices.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,374 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Apr 21, 2012 15:02 |  #53

Wilt wrote in post #14304143 (external link)
The primary principal is NOT the longevity of any specific standard, but the concept of inevitability that all standards come to an end, and then the devices which were supported by that standard might become useless pieces of hardware, relative our reading data recorded to be readable by said devices.

Yes, the point being that there is no such thing as "file it and forget it." Data from now on will have to be constantly migrated to newer media and converted to newer formats.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,579 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
Best method to archive photos???
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1950 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.