Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Oct 2010 (Wednesday) 11:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My bellows have confused me

 
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,286 posts
Likes: 114
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Oct 14, 2010 00:14 |  #16

A third rail or geared focusing stage can definitely help. Move the entire rig closer to or further from your subject to focus. But, geared focusing stages are pricey and add a lot of bulk and weight.

A "poor man's" focusing stage is simply an extra long Arca Swiss type lens plate on a compatible quick release platform. Loosen the release enough to allow you to slide the rig forward and backward to focus.

Or just put everything on a monopod and lean forward or backward to focus. It helps to have a ballhead on the monopod to allow you to tilt, too.

A bellows is nothing more than an extra long, variable extension tube. It allows for more extension than is possible with most fixed extension tubes, so allows for higher magnification.

A 135mm lens is a fairly long focal length to use for macro shooting, especially on a crop sensor camera. It's harder to hold steady and you need to stop down a lot to get any depth of field. You might find yourself using f22 or smaller, if the lens allows it. Plus you have to factor in for light fall off behind the lens. The longer the lens focal length, the more extension you need to get to 1:1 magnification (in general... not all lenses are created equal... this is effected by the lens' minimum focusing distance).

You might try the bellows with a 50mm lens. It will be a lot easier to handle and won't need as much extension, unless you are looking to do really high magnification shots.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Ran
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,555 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Hertford, England
     
Oct 14, 2010 11:38 |  #17

When I bought the bellows I only got Pentax K mounts with them and I only have a 28mm and a 135mm to put on them. I don't find the 135mm too unwieldy, most of the time it's either tripod mounted or used with a flash. Maximum magnification looks to be a bit more than 1:1. I'll be looking at picking up a Pentax 50mm sometime so I could try that with it as well.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vincent_su
Senior Member
Avatar
843 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Denver, Colorado; USA
     
Oct 14, 2010 17:16 |  #18

The Ran wrote in post #11092353 (external link)
So ideally I'd need another rail attached to the bottom of the bellows. Are there any disadvantages to focussing the way I am?

Yes, you'll need to move the whole rig, including tripod to focus your shot. That's why a focus railing is going to help you.
It probably won't hurt you to add the 50mm lens but you'll have less "working distance" with shorter focal length lens. I'm sure you've found that out compare your 135 to 28.


Vincent
"My dark room is bright and I like it."
5Diii; 24-105 f/4; 100 Macro f/2.8; 17-40 f/4; 70-200 f/4 IS; 100-400 II; TS-E90 and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Ran
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,555 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Hertford, England
     
Oct 14, 2010 19:29 |  #19

Yeah, the 28mm focuses too close even with the bellows fully retracted. As it is I can still focus it, by moving the sensor forwards and backwards and keeping the lens stationary. It probably reduces the focussing range quite a bit so some shots will require moving the tripod, but it'll do until I can get some focussing rails.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,684 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
My bellows have confused me
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Clown9644
1542 guests, 191 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.