Attempt at HDR, which I'm trying to learn to do. C & C, please.
Oct 13, 2010 15:32 | #1 Attempt at HDR, which I'm trying to learn to do. C & C, please. My Gear: 6D, 7D, EOS-M w EF-M 22 f2 STM and EF-M 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, 17-40L f4, 24-70L f2.8, 100 f2.8 non-IS macro, 70-200L f/4 IS, 400L f5.6,, Canon 1.4x II TC, Canon Speedlite 430 EX II, Better Beamer. Manfrotto carbon fiber tripod, 2 monopods, Manfrotto ballhead and pistol grip tripod heads.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
droberts Senior Member 261 posts Likes: 10 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Missouri More info | Oct 13, 2010 15:36 | #2 Seems to blue for me. Another thing is its hard to find a focal point, entire photo looks a bit OOF. Canon Stuff...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2010 16:20 | #3 droberts wrote in post #11090662 Seems to blue for me. Another thing is its hard to find a focal point, entire photo looks a bit OOF. Looks like too much noise reduction on this screen. (Was working on a small one before.) Think I can sharpen it up. Looks much bluer on this screen than the small laptop. Will see if I can tone it down. Thanks. My Gear: 6D, 7D, EOS-M w EF-M 22 f2 STM and EF-M 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, 17-40L f4, 24-70L f2.8, 100 f2.8 non-IS macro, 70-200L f/4 IS, 400L f5.6,, Canon 1.4x II TC, Canon Speedlite 430 EX II, Better Beamer. Manfrotto carbon fiber tripod, 2 monopods, Manfrotto ballhead and pistol grip tripod heads.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2010 17:50 | #4 Looks like the pine tree is glowing. Can non, can Canon. EOS 7D| G12 |Canon EF-S 15-85 mm IS US|Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6|Speedlite 430EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember 2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Oct 13, 2010 19:40 | #5 This looks like the old version of photomatix. If you purchased recently, then the new 4 version is a free upgrade and tons better in terms of, "I can't believe it;s hdr!" However, If it is the new one, try using the "smoother" option as the grunge and painterly options tend to go a little haywire. Getting back to the snap, it does have halos and that protuding bottom l/h branch is just getting in the way of the water action. Also with hdr, a tiny curves adjustment can improve things no end.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 14, 2010 10:37 | #6 corkneyfonz wrote in post #11092034 This looks like the old version of photomatix. If you purchased recently, then the new 4 version is a free upgrade and tons better in terms of, "I can't believe it;s hdr!" However, If it is the new one, try using the "smoother" option as the grunge and painterly options tend to go a little haywire. Getting back to the snap, it does have halos and that protuding bottom l/h branch is just getting in the way of the water action. Also with hdr, a tiny curves adjustment can improve things no end. Thanks. It IS the old Photomatix. Will try the upgrade and follow your suggestions. I've yet to do anything with HDR that doesn't suck. My Gear: 6D, 7D, EOS-M w EF-M 22 f2 STM and EF-M 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, 17-40L f4, 24-70L f2.8, 100 f2.8 non-IS macro, 70-200L f/4 IS, 400L f5.6,, Canon 1.4x II TC, Canon Speedlite 430 EX II, Better Beamer. Manfrotto carbon fiber tripod, 2 monopods, Manfrotto ballhead and pistol grip tripod heads.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SoaringUSAEagle Daddy Of The Crop 10,814 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cheyenne, WY More info | Oct 14, 2010 17:21 | #7 Too scared to descend to gain a different perspective? The trees take away from the waterfall, and the perspective from below is quite impressive. 5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember 2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Oct 14, 2010 18:38 | #8 SoaringUSAEagle wrote in post #11098004 Too scared to descend to gain a different perspective? The trees take away from the waterfall, and the perspective from below is quite impressive. A photographer died in similar circumstances. Full story on link.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monty28428 Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 14, 2010 18:45 | #9 Firehole River ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Oct 15, 2010 14:08 | #10 bettyn wrote in post #11095725 Thanks. It IS the old Photomatix. Will try the upgrade and follow your suggestions. I've yet to do anything with HDR that doesn't suck. Just changing the version of Photomatix won't magically convert this picture into a wallhanger. What you need are several images that have been properly exposed for shadows, highlights, and mid-tones. If you're trying to generate an HDR by creating several +/- exposures from a single RAW file, then you're wasting your time since you will never have enough of a spread in the dynamic range beyond that of your original file. Also, Photomatix isn't the end of the process...you still need to take the blended image into Photoshop or other editing software for further processing. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2714 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||