The bright sunlight was a bit harsh for these shots. Wondering if I should have taken a lower viewpoint.
artyman Sleepless in Hampshire More info | Oct 14, 2010 05:58 | #1 The bright sunlight was a bit harsh for these shots. Wondering if I should have taken a lower viewpoint. Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skygod44 "in stockings and suspenders" 6,454 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 110 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo! More info | Oct 14, 2010 06:04 | #2 Don't know about "lower", Ken, but I'm not a fan of 3/4 shots. "Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 14, 2010 10:23 | #3 There you are getting me to spend more money on lenses, I don't have an ultra wide Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Oct 14, 2010 10:45 | #4 I don't have an ultra wide I'm not a big fan of them except for an occasional specialty shot. The kids love the "WOW!" shots, but they don't make the car look very good in most cases. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JMartel Goldmember 1,307 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Oct 14, 2010 13:25 | #5 artyman wrote in post #11095648 There you are getting me to spend more money on lenses, I don't have an ultra wide ![]() You could use your 15-85mm on the lowest end. That would distort it a decent amount.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skygod44 "in stockings and suspenders" 6,454 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 110 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo! More info | Oct 14, 2010 22:12 | #6 artyman wrote in post #11095648 There you are getting me to spend more money on lenses, I don't have an ultra wide ![]() Like JMartel said, 15mm should be enough...give it a go. PhotosGuy wrote in post #11095765 I'm not a big fan of them except for an occasional specialty shot. The kids love the "WOW!" shots, but they don't make the car look very good in most cases. You might have bothered to turn the wheel in #2? True enough Frank, but I'm thinking more about extending the lines, rather than curving them! This could have given the Merc a more sleek look and feel than the current shots from Ken, which in all honesty, he could have produced with a P&S camera. JMartel wrote in post #11096668 You could use your 15-85mm on the lowest end. That would distort it a decent amount. Like what he said ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RL. Goldmember 1,040 posts Joined Apr 2010 More info | Oct 14, 2010 22:23 | #7 Permanent bancomposition/angles/reflections are pretty bad to me...try taking the pics at headlight level an find a better background Canon > Nikon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 924 guests, 116 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||