Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 14 Oct 2010 (Thursday) 09:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 lens comparison....

 
TGrundvig
Goldmember
Avatar
2,876 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
     
Oct 14, 2010 09:00 |  #1

I'm trying to decide between lenses here. I've been looking into the Canon, Sigma and Tamron 2.8 versions and it appears that the Tamron hangs better with the Canon than Sigma does. I'm not concerned with IS as much as I am with IQ.

Take a look at the tests...

http://the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=4​&APIComp=0 (external link)

Both lenses are set to 200mm at 2.8. As I go through all the mm settings, the Tamron seems to stay with the Canon at the center focus point at every level. The Tamron slightly loses sharpness at 100mm on the corners, compared to the Canon. When I compare the Sigma tests, once the Sigma gets past 100mm it loses the battle to both the Tamron and the Canon.

I can pick up a Canon version for $1000 (used), or I can buy the Tamron brand new for $769.

From the tests done at the-digital-picture.com I can't really see any obvious advantages to the Canon, other than the white body and red ring.

Have any of you used more than one of these lenses to be able to give an opinion on how the perform in the real world?


1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Oct 14, 2010 09:10 |  #2

Thanks. It is a really interesting chart. I went through some of my lenses and the accuracy is very close.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 14, 2010 10:18 as a reply to  @ SuzyView's post |  #3

Pictures from a Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 lens, all at 200mm and f/2.8.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TGrundvig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,876 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
     
Oct 15, 2010 16:04 |  #4

Thanks DC fan, nice selection of action and low light. The focus point seems to be nice and sharp.


1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bjyoder
Goldmember
Avatar
1,664 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central Ohio
     
Oct 15, 2010 16:24 |  #5

Owning the Tamron, I can tell you that, optically speaking, it is going to be one hard lens to give up; I can't imagine owning a better zoom lens. Equal maybe, but it's going to be hard to do better.

Here's the #1 downside to the Tamron: The auto focus. It is loud and slow. Normally spot on until it gets dark, but slow as a slug. I've shot professional soccer with it, but it struggled to keep up, while my friend with a Canon 2.8 non-IS was getting sick of hearing me complain! :lol:

I highly recommend it for portraits and such, but if you're looking to shoot sports, pop for either the Sigma or Canon.


Ben

500px (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,596 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
70-200 lens comparison....
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1386 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.