Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 27 Aug 2005 (Saturday) 13:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

PC question

 
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Aug 27, 2005 13:31 |  #1

Is there an adverse affect when you create (reasonably) many directories, maybe a 100-200 on an external drive.

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ByteTheBullet
Member
Avatar
94 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: U.S.A
     
Aug 27, 2005 19:27 |  #2

The only thing I can think of would be that the root, i.e. D:\, may be limited to a certain number, but sub directories should be fine. I am not sure if this is still an issue. WinXP and NTFS may not care.


ByteTheBullet (-:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davepgh1
Senior Member
303 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Sep 01, 2005 21:17 |  #3

The fix is in, bring them on.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 01, 2005 22:27 |  #4

A drive's a drive, doesn't matter where it is.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Sep 02, 2005 00:00 |  #5

aam1234 wrote:
Is there an adverse affect when you create (reasonably) many directories, maybe a 100-200 on an external drive.

Thanks

Should we assume that the "external" drive is via a USB port?

If so, one gigantic problem that I have experienced is the slowness in doing a defrag. Apparently (and not unreasonably) a defrag involves reading every block of data into the computer (via the USB) and then writing it back to the external drive. Unbelievably slow.

The other concern with any external drive is that you normally have to choose what file structure you want during the initial installation, partitioning and formatting - usually a choice between FAT32 and NTFS. If you plan to ever write a single file of 4.3 GB or more on that drive be sure to format it for NTFS, because the FAT32 system does not support a file size greater than 4.3 GB - that's a real concern when doing massive backups.

Under DOS in the good old days there was a limit on how many entries were allowed in the root - specifically 256. I don't know whether such a limit exists in Windows XP - but I would not think so.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

835 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
PC question
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
965 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.