Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Oct 2010 (Monday) 09:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Want around-the-house lens, no flash

 
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Oct 18, 2010 19:57 |  #61

AntonLargiader wrote in post #11122092 (external link)
If I were buying a lens tomorrow for what I've described, I don't think I'd go wrong with the Sigma.

I don't think you would be either !


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AntonLargiader
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,115 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 415
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Charlottesville, VA
     
Oct 18, 2010 20:46 |  #62

DreDaze wrote in post #11121975 (external link)
..my recommendation is buy a prime to start...something like the sigma 30mm f1.4...but quickly follow that with an external flash, cause you'll need it

Very nice; your photos make your points well. I don't disagree with any of it and will probably do exactly what you suggest. Still doesn't change the basic mission here, though.


Image editing and C&C always OK
Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . TT1/TT5 . Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dan_bgblue
Senior Member
Avatar
632 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Oct 18, 2010 20:50 as a reply to  @ CountryBoy's post |  #63

Sigma 30. Indoor photography without a hotshoe flash will finally drive you to purchase one or just stop taking pictures, one or the other. You are recording memories that you will want to keep for a lifetime. Get a flash.;)


Gear list: S5IS, 40D, Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM, Canon 50mm f1.8 mk1, Canon 85mm f1.8, Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM, 430EXII, Kenko 1.4x TC, tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
p6889k
Member
Avatar
225 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
     
Oct 18, 2010 21:12 |  #64

In me experience, when shooting indoors, fast prime with no flash is only good enough during the day hours. Once the sun goes down, it's time to put on a flash or two or three and bounce them off the ceiling if it's of a neutral color. You don't have to use the flash as the primary light source, but as a secondary light that provides only a little bit of extra light. The only time I use fast prime with no flash at night is when I want to capture a certain mood, for example my son going to sleep with only the nightstand lamp turned on; or my wife reading a book under a lamp; or sitting by a fireplace with the fire going, etc.. For these 24mm/1.4 and high ISO is great. When my son was born, the best thing to use was a macro lens so that I could get close and a bounce flash to get enough shutter speed and DOF. If you really don't want to use flash because of health concern, it's your baby after all, I would recommend you get something like 24/1.4. If you think you would use the flash, I would say get external flash and a macro lens. When your baby gets older you can get whatever other lenses you may need at that time.


5D IV, EOS-1V
50/1.2L, 200/2.8L
Zeiss ZE 21/2.8, 35/2, 100/2
Hassleblad 2003FCW, 50/2.8, 110/2, 250/5.6 SA
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sebr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,628 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sweden/France
     
Oct 18, 2010 21:45 |  #65

I have a 4 year old and I am using both fast primes and flash for indoors shots (together with a camera that can handle high ISO). A fast prime is often enough in the daytime, but I prfer to have some control of the light; in many room, windows are only on one side and light may therefore cast shadows depending on the position of the subject. I use prime for speed and thin depth of field.

I'd get a Sigma 30/1.4 first and a flash later...


Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LED
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
2,497 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Aug 2006
Location: West Tennessee, USA
     
Oct 18, 2010 22:17 |  #66

I have a few fast primes and a flash and think they both have their place. There are many times when the flash is the best solution.

This shot of my granddaughter was taken with bounced flash (+diffuser) and a 17-55IS. The intensity was adjusted to where it just provided fill light.

1/125s f/2.8 at 43.0mm iso400

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/120548724.jpg

This is a shot of the same granddaughter on her birthday using a 35L with just candle light.
1/125s f/1.4 at 35.0mm iso400 (notice the shutter speed and ISO settings are the same as above, but it's not as sharp because she was moving and the DOF is very shallow.)
IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/89964019.jpg

Before your child is mobile, the fast prime should suffice. Once the child is walking/crawling, you're going to need a flash.

Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
996gt2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,045 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cincinnati
     
Oct 18, 2010 22:22 |  #67

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM

End of discussion.


Buy/Sell Feedback
5Dc, 50D, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Oct 19, 2010 05:52 |  #68

996gt2 wrote in post #11122933 (external link)
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM

End of discussion.

actually, once you see results like this you'll ditch that sigma 30mm and buy a flash !

RPCrowe wrote in post #11120538 (external link)
A bounced flash with a reflector diffuser will more often give you better lighting than available light.

I use an older 550EX or a 420EX with a Joe demb Flash Diffuser Pro ( dembflashproducts.com )

My flash images look like natural light...

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com …d7Vf#858914758_​ZTMxQ-A-LB  (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waterrockets
Goldmember
Avatar
3,945 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 311
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Austin (near TX)
     
Oct 19, 2010 08:31 |  #69

While that's not harsh, it's still flash looking, and I don't think I'd compare it to natural lighting. Her sleeves just picked up too much of it, and everything looks a little cool.


1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 550D w/grip & ML| EF 70-200mm f2.8L| EF 24-105mm f4L IS | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | 430EXii | EF 50mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Oct 19, 2010 10:33 |  #70

gonzogolf wrote in post #11119453 (external link)
I agree with Taylor. Even if you get enough light, its often bad light. Get a flash and learn how to use it properly and you can make any lens work for you.

Agree with both. I got sigma 30mm f1.4 for my 1dmk2 and I still like to use bounce flash. Makes the images look so much better. Here is a recent shot @f1.8. I typically use it at f1.4 and it is super sharp as good or better than 135L and I got 300mm f2.8 IS to compare with.

IMAGE: http://www.bobbyzphotography.com/img/s8/v10/p895638361-5.jpg

If you worried about flash and eyes, use higher ISOs and fast apertures. The light in that case is so little and with bounce is not direct. I did use ABs on my newborn, the flash/eye myth keeps rolling on. Don't the babies see sun when they out?

Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twoshadows
Liquid Nitrogen
Avatar
7,342 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Best ofs: 19
Likes: 4904
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Between the palms and the pines.
     
Oct 19, 2010 11:17 |  #71

Always have a hot shoe flash with a rotating head on your camera. Period.

You don't always have to use it, but you will find it helpful a lot of the time. Fast glass high iso will only take you so far.

bounced

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


ambient light

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


bounced

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/114382062/original.jpg

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

xgender.net (external link) Miss Julia Grey (she/her/Miss)
The Chronochromagraph "how to" thread

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Oct 19, 2010 11:22 |  #72

waterrockets wrote in post #11124791 (external link)
While that's not harsh, it's still flash looking, and I don't think I'd compare it to natural lighting. Her sleeves just picked up too much of it, and everything looks a little cool.

The reason her sleeves picked up too much is because it was shot using an external flash connected to the hotshoe. Even with a flash diffuser, the flash is too direct. I have a LumiPro flash diffuser which sits there collecting dust. I only like to use bounce flash or off camera flash now that I've learned how to use it. Put those in the direction of natural light and you'll be hard pressed to realize it is flash. If things are cool, you can use a gel. If the OP has off-colored walls, finds flash lighting too cool or whatever, then he could use gels that he knows works for his home.

Natural light does not mean it's good light.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waterrockets
Goldmember
Avatar
3,945 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 311
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Austin (near TX)
     
Oct 19, 2010 11:25 |  #73

twoshadows: Yeah, those bounces look great. Much more natural than the boy above with purple streaks in his hair.


1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 550D w/grip & ML| EF 70-200mm f2.8L| EF 24-105mm f4L IS | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | 430EXii | EF 50mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaftmaster
Goldmember
Avatar
1,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: above 5000 feet
     
Oct 19, 2010 11:27 |  #74

I would've missed so many indoor shots of my kids if I didn't have a decent external flash. Heck, I would've missed shots if I didn't have a pop-up flash too. You can't expect your kids to be in the right place, at the right time of day, and with adequate light every time they do something special you want to capture. Buy an external flash, learn how to balance the flash with the ambient light, and start capturing every moment.


Paul

Gear -- Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Oct 19, 2010 13:43 |  #75

shaftmaster wrote in post #11125735 (external link)
I would've missed so many indoor shots of my kids if I didn't have a decent external flash. Heck, I would've missed shots if I didn't have a pop-up flash too. You can't expect your kids to be in the right place, at the right time of day, and with adequate light every time they do something special you want to capture. Buy an external flash, learn how to balance the flash with the ambient light, and start capturing every moment.

yes, sometimes I feel sorry for those people that don't have a decent external flash and miss those children shots, they only grow up once you know. Then I think, hey, you can get an ETTL flash for only $60, they really have no excuses. Then I feel better




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,902 views & 0 likes for this thread, 31 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Want around-the-house lens, no flash
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1065 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.