Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 20 Oct 2010 (Wednesday) 15:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Should I remove 4x6?

 
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:21 |  #1

So, I was thinking about removing the option to order 4x6 prints from my sports lineup. The 5x7 would be the smallest size available, other than wallets, from the website. Just a thought.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:25 |  #2

I dont know your market or your production cost differences. But 5x7 is a traditional enlargement size whereas 4x6 is the standard print size. I'd offer the 5x7 (provided it doesnt skew your print costs too badly) simply because it sends the message that its more of a custom item and not something that came off the roll.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:28 |  #3

gonzogolf wrote in post #11133519 (external link)
I dont know your market or your production cost differences. But 5x7 is a traditional enlargement size whereas 4x6 is the standard print size. I'd offer the 5x7 (provided it doesnt skew your print costs too badly) simply because it sends the message that its more of a custom item and not something that came off the roll.

That is kind of the same line of thinking I had. I will actually make more of a profit on a 5x7 than a 4x6.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Methodical
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,894 posts
Gallery: 239 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 3667
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Where ever I lay my hat is my home
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:28 |  #4

I say leave it because it's just that - an option. Price it in a way to make the 5x7 more attractive. Why are you considering removing it?

I find most folks seem to like the 4x6 because they can easily find inexpensive frames for them and that most folks usually have those 4x6 photo albums, at least that's what a parent told me. But this may vary by region. I myself think the 5x7 is a very nice size photo, no to small (4x6) and not to big, (8x10) and I try and convince the parents the same, but they like the 4x6.

Oh well, just one man's opinion.


Gear
MethodicalImages (external link)
Flickr (external link)
"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the Titanic"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:31 |  #5

Methodical wrote in post #11133540 (external link)
I say leave it because it's just that - an option. Price it in a way to make the 5x7 more attractive. Why are you considering removing it?

I find most folks seem to like the 4x6 because they can easily find inexpensive frames for them and they most folks usually have those 4x6 photo albums, at least that's what a parent told me. But this may vary by region. I myself think the 5x7 is a very nice size photo, no to small (4x6) and not to big, (8x10).

Oh well, just one man's opinion.

But are people buying his action shots to stick in that sort of an album? I doubt 4x6 frames are any more common than 5x7.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonwhite
Goldmember
Avatar
1,279 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:32 |  #6

I know some photographers that sell 5 x 7 and 6 x 4 at the same price, it makes the 5 x 7 prints look like a bargain and still allows people who specifically want 6 x 4 to buy them.


Wedding Portfolio Website (external link) | Wedding Photographer Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
Avatar
4,652 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2006
Location: Channelview, Tx
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:32 |  #7

I have heard a lot of talk about scrap bookers. Eliminating the 4x6 might cost you some sales because the smaller size is not available.


MaxPreps Profile (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Methodical
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,894 posts
Gallery: 239 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 3667
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Where ever I lay my hat is my home
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:33 |  #8

I don't doubt it, but that's what a parent said to me. Personally, I like the 5x7.

gonzogolf wrote in post #11133567 (external link)
But are people buying his action shots to
stick in that sort of an album? I doubt 4x6 frames are any more common than 5x7.


Gear
MethodicalImages (external link)
Flickr (external link)
"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the Titanic"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:38 as a reply to  @ Methodical's post |  #9

Thanks for the thoughts, guys. I'm really torn between keeping it and losing it. As I look around our house, the majority of our stand alone frames are 5x7. The majority of our sales are 4x6. I just wonder if they bought that size because it was the smallest or because that is the size they really wanted.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Svetlana
Goldmember
Avatar
3,357 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Oct 20, 2010 15:57 |  #10

I think they buy it because it's the cheapest. I rarely sell 4x6's.


Canon 7D, 5Dmk2, 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, Canon 50 1.2L, 35 1.4L, 85 1.8, Canon 16-35L, Canon 100 2.8L IS Macro, Speedlight 580EX II x 2, 430 EX, enthusiasm.:D http://svetlanayanova.​com/ (external link)

Join me on Facebook (external link)! :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 20, 2010 16:05 |  #11

As mentioned above you could test it by offering both options at the same price and see if you still sell the smaller ones.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickJushchyshyn
Senior Member
289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
     
Oct 20, 2010 16:18 |  #12

We offer 4x6 prints for sports, but only in sets (usually of 3 or 5). The sets are priced well above a single 8x10, but customers can opt to have each print in the set be of a different photo. It's one of the most popular offerings we sell online. It's a great value, both for us and to the customer.


www.techvantics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Oct 20, 2010 20:49 |  #13

My sales increased when I started to offer 4x6 prints. I would rather sell 8- 4x6 than (1) 5x7.
The 4x6 order will cost me $1.57 more than the cost of one 5x7. My typical 4x6 sale is for between 8-10 prints. My typical 5x7 order was (and still is) for 1 print. The 4x6 order is $40, the 5x7 order is $9.


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gym ­ Star ­ Photos
Member
Avatar
138 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Plano, TX
     
Oct 20, 2010 21:00 |  #14

I went back and forth with myself over this one... drop the 4x6 or not... What I did was talked with some of the moms that will be at some of the events we cover. I managed to work in the question "what size photo do you like the best? and why?"... almost all of them said they liked the 4x6 for scrapbooking. I had no idea that people still made scrapbooks! I decided to keep them for this year.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Oct 20, 2010 21:02 |  #15

asysin2leads wrote in post #11133607 (external link)
Thanks for the thoughts, guys. I'm really torn between keeping it and losing it. As I look around our house, the majority of our stand alone frames are 5x7. The majority of our sales are 4x6. I just wonder if they bought that size because it was the smallest or because that is the size they really wanted.

I was going to ask that. Seems to answer the question, I would think.

From an artistic photographic perspective I'd rather sell 4x6s because there's no cropping. Most of the time cropping to a 5x7 is fine, but not always.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,196 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Should I remove 4x6?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1683 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.