We were having a very nice and heated debate over in the Poll over 7D Remorse? post, and I decided I would put this together into a new thread. Discussions welcome, I tried to do this correctly per requests from others. I did a high ISO review some time ago too.
(LEGEND: top or left is always 7D, bottom or right is 5D)
Okay, I used my daughter as an unwilling participant in a quick (wasn't so quick, at least not for her) test between the 7D and 5DII. I used my 70-200 2.8 and used the same settings on both, in exposure, picture style (portrait), both AWB, both center point w/expansion, and noise reduction (standard), I just changed the focal length to try to frame the same in each shot.
No post processing, direct results comparing the two. What I noticed are slight color and exposure differences though they were set the same. I used 1600, which the 5DII won't even break a sweat, but others seem to not like the noise on the 7D here, so it seemed to be a fair compromise.
You can see the DOF differences because of the longer FL on the 5D, which is neat, and also the smoother overall complexion of the 5DII. Probably the only 2 things that stand out to me anyways.
No post processing, first the overall scene, then crops...
./showthread.php?p=11147387&i=i107341593
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
./showthread.php?p=11147387&i=i195626108
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
Now the same post processing action I usually use on my lower ISO shots, ran on both. Again the color/exposure differences seem to cause a bigger impact on auto-level? The 5DII seems truer to life though, I will say, even though I used the same settings on both.
./showthread.php?p=11147392&i=i42439336
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
./showthread.php?p=11147392&i=i99279727
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
Just for grins, can you perform the test with the 7D at ISO 640 and the 5Dmk2 at ISO 1600? You'll be able to equalize the depths of field, too, either by narrowing the 5Dmk2's aperture by 1.3 stops, or (if possible) by widening the 7D's by 1.3 stops, either of which should nicely equalize your shutter speeds. You won't even have to change your flash power between the two cameras with them set up that way.
I only ask because while I realize that the 5Dmk2 will perform better than the 7D at any given ISO, it does so by giving up some depth of field. Sometimes that's perfectly okay, but I'd like to see how the shots look when the photographic parameters are equalized that way. It'll give better insight into the inherent differences in the properties of the sensors.
Not sure I did this correctly KCBrown, the exif should be intact to see if I messed it up. I used ISO 1250, f2.8 on the 7D, then ISO 3200, f4.5 on the 5DII. Let me know if I didn't do this correctly. No post processing at all, RAW->JPG.
First the overall scene, just resized...
./showthread.php?p=11147614&i=i66195021
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
./showthread.php?p=11147614&i=i15323639
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
Now for the crops...
Later Observation: tonal graduations are better on the 5D, and I might have twitched a bit on that last shot, yielding a slightly less sharp 5D crop. They are very close compared to other test shots I have taken of this same subject.
./showthread.php?p=11147617&i=i266500365
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
./showthread.php?p=11147617&i=i251089846
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
Thanks. There is a slight difference.
First, the 7D shot does appear to have slightly more noise, but oddly enough in the resized shots it looks smoother. That's probably a combination of the slight brightness difference between the two and the JPEG compression. This comparison makes it clear that the 7D has been slightly "tuned" towards higher ISO performance at the expense of lower ISO performance, because if that weren't the case then the noise signatures should be nearly identical, if not favoring the 7D slightly.






