Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Oct 2010 (Friday) 20:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mini-Review: 7D and 5DII Quick IQ Comparison

 
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 22, 2010 20:44 |  #1

We were having a very nice and heated debate over in the Poll over 7D Remorse? post, and I decided I would put this together into a new thread. Discussions welcome, I tried to do this correctly per requests from others. I did a high ISO review some time ago too.

(LEGEND: top or left is always 7D, bottom or right is 5D)

TeamSpeed wrote:
Okay, I used my daughter as an unwilling participant in a quick (wasn't so quick, at least not for her) test between the 7D and 5DII. I used my 70-200 2.8 and used the same settings on both, in exposure, picture style (portrait), both AWB, both center point w/expansion, and noise reduction (standard), I just changed the focal length to try to frame the same in each shot.

No post processing, direct results comparing the two. What I noticed are slight color and exposure differences though they were set the same. I used 1600, which the 5DII won't even break a sweat, but others seem to not like the noise on the 7D here, so it seemed to be a fair compromise.

You can see the DOF differences because of the longer FL on the 5D, which is neat, and also the smoother overall complexion of the 5DII. Probably the only 2 things that stand out to me anyways.

No post processing, first the overall scene, then crops...

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47387&i=i107341593
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47387&i=i195626108
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

TeamSpeed wrote:
Now the same post processing action I usually use on my lower ISO shots, ran on both. Again the color/exposure differences seem to cause a bigger impact on auto-level? The 5DII seems truer to life though, I will say, even though I used the same settings on both.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47392&i=i42439336
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47392&i=i99279727
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

kcbrown wrote:
Just for grins, can you perform the test with the 7D at ISO 640 and the 5Dmk2 at ISO 1600? You'll be able to equalize the depths of field, too, either by narrowing the 5Dmk2's aperture by 1.3 stops, or (if possible) by widening the 7D's by 1.3 stops, either of which should nicely equalize your shutter speeds. You won't even have to change your flash power between the two cameras with them set up that way.

I only ask because while I realize that the 5Dmk2 will perform better than the 7D at any given ISO, it does so by giving up some depth of field. Sometimes that's perfectly okay, but I'd like to see how the shots look when the photographic parameters are equalized that way. It'll give better insight into the inherent differences in the properties of the sensors.

TeamSpeed wrote:
Not sure I did this correctly KCBrown, the exif should be intact to see if I messed it up. I used ISO 1250, f2.8 on the 7D, then ISO 3200, f4.5 on the 5DII. Let me know if I didn't do this correctly. No post processing at all, RAW->JPG.

First the overall scene, just resized...

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47614&i=i66195021
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47614&i=i15323639
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

TeamSpeed wrote:
Now for the crops...

Later Observation: tonal graduations are better on the 5D, and I might have twitched a bit on that last shot, yielding a slightly less sharp 5D crop. They are very close compared to other test shots I have taken of this same subject.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47617&i=i266500365
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=111​47617&i=i251089846
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

kcbrown wrote:
Thanks. There is a slight difference.

First, the 7D shot does appear to have slightly more noise, but oddly enough in the resized shots it looks smoother. That's probably a combination of the slight brightness difference between the two and the JPEG compression. This comparison makes it clear that the 7D has been slightly "tuned" towards higher ISO performance at the expense of lower ISO performance, because if that weren't the case then the noise signatures should be nearly identical, if not favoring the 7D slightly.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,422 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Oct 23, 2010 03:29 |  #2

Well too my eyes I can't honestly see much difference between the two. Perhaps instead of the the 7D versus 5d2 wars it would be better to just go out and shoot.


Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J_TULLAR
Goldmember
Avatar
3,011 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Oct 23, 2010 03:31 |  #3

artyman wrote in post #11149214 (external link)
Well too my eyes I can't honestly see much difference between the two. Perhaps instead of the the 7D versus 5d2 wars it would be better to just go out and shoot.

I second that :cool:


Model Mayhem (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
damnit
Senior Member
Avatar
500 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portugal
     
Oct 23, 2010 04:51 |  #4

I personally think they are very different animals, and ideally I would like one of each for the different types of photography I would like to do, but whatever you have got, spending time enjoying shooting with it will do you far more good than arguing about it round here :D

Thanks for the comparisons ... and FWIW in all 7D shots I see some of what I see with my 50D shots, punchier and slightly harsher details and colours ... it might seem slight, but I see it a lot round here which is another reason why I would like a 5D II, to me it captures far more detail and subtleties than my crop sensor is able to.

I personally think the reason for choosing either of these cameras is quite obvious, but if you can't see it for yourself , then simply save yourself some money and get yourself the improved fps/AF etc of the a 7D ;)


Website & Galleries (external link)
Flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Avatar
10,429 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
     
Oct 23, 2010 06:39 |  #5

I know there are many members who have both cameras and some prefer the 5D MkII over the 7D when it comes to ISO results but from what I've seen around the web and your samples too TS ... I just don't see anything that sets the 5D MkII apart as really surpassing the 7D in this category.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Oct 23, 2010 06:45 |  #6

When I did this test, the first thing that seem to stand out to me was more the tonal qualities of the 5D.

The 7D, when dialed in with lenses, pulls the details, I really haven't seen very much even in regards where supposedly the 5DII has a weaker AA filter. I run the same actions on both sets and get something like 98-99% of the same details. However the 5D image is less harsh (I think somebody said this) and has a smoother appearance.

I also like the added life to f2.8 zoom lenses that the 5D brings to the table in regards to DOF. I know the reason the DOF is different is because once you frame your image the same as the crop, you either have changed your distance and/or FL, and that causes the DOF difference, but still, it does give that little extra.

I just like doing these tests because I have long since lost count of how many say "the 5D IQ is dramatically better than the 7D", etc. It is certainly not dramatic, but there is a difference that many do enjoy, and rightly so. That being said about the 5D, the 7D is easily the most versatile of any crop camera Canon has made to date, barring the 1D series. :)

The 1Ds MKIV will be an amazing camera if Canon keeps up the improvements. It will be an exciting announcement I think.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Oct 23, 2010 06:50 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #7

awesome..lets see the PP action:eek:


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Oct 23, 2010 07:01 |  #8

lol, not much difference, a bit punchier. Here it is with a more creative crop too.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luigis
Goldmember
Avatar
1,399 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
     
Oct 23, 2010 07:37 |  #9

You can't compare different format images unless you have the SAME DOF in both pictures. When you put both cameras at F2.8 the 7D has the advantage of a larger DOF, it's hard to know if a section of the photo is not sharp or just not in focus and thus you can't compare.

If you want to use your 7D at F2.8 ISO640 1/500 then put the 5DII at F4.5, 1/500 ISO1600 then you'll have the same DOF, same shutter speed,same diffraction levels and same noise level.

Test = FAIL


www.luisargerich.com (external link)
Landscape Photography & Astrophotography
Follow me on Twitter (external link)
My Awesome Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Oct 23, 2010 08:21 |  #10

luigis wrote in post #11149589 (external link)
You can't compare different format images unless you have the SAME DOF in both pictures. When you put both cameras at F2.8 the 7D has the advantage of a larger DOF, it's hard to know if a section of the photo is not sharp or just not in focus and thus you can't compare.

If you want to use your 7D at F2.8 ISO640 1/500 then put the 5DII at F4.5, 1/500 ISO1600 then you'll have the same DOF, same shutter speed,same diffraction levels and same noise level.

Test = FAIL

Perhaps you need to relook at the 2nd set of images, somebody needs some coffee to get started this morning. There are two tests here, one that shows the difference between the 5D and 7D with the same FOV and same exposure settings, and one exactly what you said, equalizing the formats. It covers the two ways people compare the two formats. In both cases, comparing sharpness is still valid. Comment = FAIL :)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Oct 23, 2010 08:38 |  #11

And this test clearly shows the 5D MK II to be better.... :D

(Read this post with the humour of a 5D MK II owner - there really doesn't seem to be any real difference if any)


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Oct 23, 2010 08:38 |  #12

7D more harsh... that be me that said that. I haven't done any side by side testing, and won't, but that was one of the first things that I noticed about the 7D. Actually it was the first thing. I can speculate it has to do with the higher noise levels at low/mid ISO than the 5DII and is what contributes to the appeareance of sharper tonal graduations. How it will affect my overall (dis)pleasure with my 7D is still to be determined. I am seriously looking forward to a 5DIII.

TS: Thanks for the all the time you have put into these posts.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
droopy1592
Member
56 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Oct 23, 2010 08:49 |  #13

There is not much in it. To balance the poster with the negative comment that didn't even read the entire post, thanks for going out of your way to do the work!


| Canon 7D| Canon 5D|Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS| Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II |
my photos on flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ziffle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Big "D" - Texas
     
Oct 23, 2010 08:50 |  #14

Nice work Teamspeed.

It would be cool to see a sample of say a 20x16 print between the 2 cameras.

Now that the initial dust has settled from the 7D's release.... we can get back to creating great images with what ever camera you have.

I am another shooter waiting for the 5Dmkiii.

but this does not mean i am sitting on the side lines .... nope.


(....Just some random thoughts)


_______________
Wedding Photog's rule ........... just not sure what???
--
Gear List ~ VIAweddingPhoto(DOT)co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Destractions
Senior Member
Avatar
391 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Victoria BC
     
Oct 23, 2010 09:04 |  #15

Wow, I thought there was supposed to be some appreciable difference between FF and a crop when it came to portraits. I'm having a pretty hard time seeing what the big deal is when it comes down to the final image.


The unholy trinity:
EF 70-200mm F4 \ & Tamron-F 2X TC
EFS 17-55mm f/2.8
EFS 10-22mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

27,202 views & 0 likes for this thread, 39 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Mini-Review: 7D and 5DII Quick IQ Comparison
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1460 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.