I usually hand-hold. Yes, the size varies a little, but the focus stacking programs know that, and will scale the images appropriately to make them line up.
Nov 17, 2010 15:37 | #16 I usually hand-hold. Yes, the size varies a little, but the focus stacking programs know that, and will scale the images appropriately to make them line up. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 18, 2010 09:35 | #17 TrevorD wrote in post #11301767 ...are you guys using a focus rail, or adjusting focus to create the stack?.. How do you keep the bugs under control? Do you just hope they hang around, or are they incapacitated somehow? Howdy Trevor,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | Nov 19, 2010 11:20 | #18 Dave Weldon wrote in post #11306299 Howdy Trevor, I didn't use a focus rail. My T2i was locked-down in a tripod and I crept the lens' focus ring forward 12 times across the insect's body rather than moving the point of focus by moving the camera. I actually never even thought about what the different effect would be between the two methods. That's how I did the stacking of the model train locomotive. This is just conjecture on my part, but I think the software might have problems aligning the stack if you change the camera position because the entire point of view would be changing, not just the point of focus. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2010 12:53 | #19 JWright wrote in post #11312641 That's how I did the stacking of the model train locomotive. This is just conjecture on my part, but I think the software might have problems aligning the stack if you change the camera position because the entire point of view would be changing, not just the point of focus. Yes, you can definitely get some weirdness if you move the camera a lot, but on little stuff, the gain in (apparent) DOF far outweighs distortion from changing positions. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 921 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||