Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 Oct 2010 (Sunday) 13:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The perfect all round lens??????

 
Ryan7490
Senior Member
264 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Oct 24, 2010 14:01 as a reply to  @ post 11155820 |  #16

You really only need three lenses.


Nikon D610, 50 f/1.8, 70-300 VRII


 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Oct 24, 2010 14:03 |  #17

The ultimate beginners kit: 18-55mm IS, 50mm f/1.8, and 55-250mm. You can get it all for about $400 or close to $500 new. From here, you can decide what you like and upgrade from there.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3433
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Oct 24, 2010 14:07 |  #18

AmbientMike wrote in post #11156041 (external link)
If you can get close, the 135/2.8 canon might be the cheapest with good speed for rugby. Available used for sometimes under US$300. 200/2.8 probably better.

i don't know if the focusing speed on the 135mm is going to be any better than something like the 55-250mm...it'll be good if f2.8 is needed, but if it's not, i think the 55-250mm would work out o.k.

hieu1004 wrote in post #11156050 (external link)
The ultimate beginners kit: 18-55mm IS, 50mm f/1.8, and 55-250mm. You can get it all for about $400 or close to $500 new. From here, you can decide what you like and upgrade from there.

i think that, and adding a flash is a great set-up


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 24, 2010 14:13 as a reply to  @ DreDaze's post |  #19

A glance at images from a Tamron 18-200mm lens, at the extremes of the unit's focal lengths.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


At 18mm.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Around a half-hour later, at 200mm.


For this event, the Tamron 18-200mm was used because its wide focal length range made it useful, in an exceptionally dirty and dusty event where changing lenses was not advisable.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tnebigyin121
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Oct 24, 2010 14:27 |  #20

CountryBoy wrote in post #11155820 (external link)
There is no such lens !
I would suggest getting a Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 non-VC for the landscape and such , and the Canon 70-200mm f/4 for the rugby. Then save your money for a macro .

Funnily enough, I already have this lens and was considering selling it along with the G12 which would put my budget upto, maybe 700 UK pounds, for the perfect lens!!

Andy




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3433
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Oct 24, 2010 14:29 |  #21

so you already have the 40D, and tamron 17-50mm?...anything else?

i'd look at just adding a lens instead of going for an all-in one type lens...

maybe look at the new tamron 70-300VC...it should fit under budget i'd think...and the focusing should be faster than the 55-250mm which would help for your sons action shots


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SiaoP
Goldmember
Avatar
1,406 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
     
Oct 24, 2010 15:11 |  #22

The 70-200 f/2.8 IS or non is what I use a lot. It's a very useful focal range and at 2.8 you can use it to control your bokeh and adjust yourself to difficult lighting situations. The 24-70 is what I find most useful after the 70-200 for general walk around stuff.


My Flickr (external link) | Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Oct 24, 2010 15:13 |  #23

I personally like 70-200 on FF quite a bit. Although I tend to keep a 17-40 in my pocket as well.


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Oct 24, 2010 15:16 |  #24

tnebigyin121 wrote in post #11156161 (external link)
Funnily enough, I already have this lens and was considering selling it along with the G12 which would put my budget upto, maybe 700 UK pounds, for the perfect lens!!

Andy

Then keep it and add a 70-200mm and you're set to go !


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Oct 24, 2010 15:38 |  #25

just get the 55-250IS and you're set to go !


XSi/450D and 55-250IS -

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2602/4117657403_dce5c31013_z.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fritzk3
Member
240 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
Oct 25, 2010 10:27 |  #26

watt100 wrote in post #11156508 (external link)
just get the 55-250IS and you're set to go !


XSi/450D and 55-250IS -

QUOTED IMAGE

I second this advice. It's an excellent lens for its price, and not too heavy of an investment while you try to sort out your hobby. With the 40D, you will have decent enough performance at ISO 800, and maybe even 1250, that you can push it if you need it in lower light.

If you try this lens and find it too limiting, then you'll probably have better insight into which area of your shooting that you need better lens performance.


Canon 40D • EF-S 18-55 IS • EF-S 55-250 IS EF 28-135 IS USM EF 50/1.8 EF 85/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 25, 2010 10:47 |  #27

If there was a single perfect lens for everything, then what would be the point of having an interchangeable lens mount?


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 25, 2010 10:48 |  #28

fritzk3 wrote in post #11160855 (external link)
I second this advice. It's an excellent lens for its price, and not too heavy of an investment while you try to sort out your hobby. With the 40D, you will have decent enough performance at ISO 800, and maybe even 1250, that you can push it if you need it in lower light.

ISO 1250 @ f5.6 is NOT "lower light". That would be like a heavily overcast day outside. The 55-250 is worthless once the sun touches the horizon.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JPM ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Oct 25, 2010 10:49 |  #29

hieu1004 wrote in post #11156050 (external link)
The ultimate beginners kit: 18-55mm IS, 50mm f/1.8, and 55-250mm. You can get it all for about $400 or close to $500 new. From here, you can decide what you like and upgrade from there.

+1

I have heard fantastic things about this kit. If I were starting again I would go with this.

(I had the original 18-55 and the 55-200. not nearly as good....)


60D gripped, T2i gripped, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Pentax SMC 50 f/1.4, Nikon Standard Speed Set: 24, 35, 85, 105, 135, 180, Canon 580ex, Calumet Genesis 200
jpmphotovideo.com (external link)
Please check out my film resume (external link) and contact me if you need a DP, AC, or PA for an Atlanta-based shoot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AmbientMike
Member
50 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 25, 2010 11:00 |  #30

If you already have the 17-50, that may be pretty close to the perfect lens! Can you afford a used 300/4 non-IS? that would probably be really good for rugby. Wildlife too Or maybe 200/2.8 or tamron 70-210/2.8 type zoom. I think 500 pounds might be enough for one of these. Don't know how close the 17-50 focuses, but the 18-55 gets close enough for some macro.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,939 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
The perfect all round lens??????
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1144 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.