Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 24 Oct 2010 (Sunday) 23:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mac or PC?

 
this thread is locked
r31ncarnat3d
Senior Member
633 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Nov 09, 2010 12:00 |  #46

Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.4 GHz
4GB RAM @ 1068 MHz
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black
Western Digital 2TB Caviar Green
EVGA GTX 260 216SP @ 680 Core/[forgot shaders]/2200 Mem
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
LR3
PS CS5

I run a small form factor system (mATX in a Sugo SG02). The tradeoff for the smaller footprint is that I can't take my Q9550 to 4.0 GHz anymore. Luckily though I can still OC my graphics card to great speeds, but I still need to figure out CUDA acceleration.


Canon 80D | Canon SL2 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 ART | Canon 24mm f/2.8 STM
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 | Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
benesotor
Goldmember
1,827 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Mar 2009
     
Nov 09, 2010 12:37 |  #47

Windows 7 with Core 2 Quad Q6600, 6GB and 1.6TB. Still does all my work, from photoshop to Premiere.
I like Windows 7, but I would like to learn Final Cut. I don't like OSx anymore than windows. I would get a Mac Pro but the price is just ridiculous so I'll keep my PC going for as long as possible.

I do work on Mac's a lot of the time though, so I'll happily use both.

To me, both systems are equally stable, equally easy to use and both let me do work in the same amount of time. Windows is just much cheaper, which is why I use it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimmer411
Thank god Im green.
866 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Pacific, WA
     
Nov 11, 2010 14:40 |  #48

Dell 23U11H
Samsung 206bw
Phenom 9950 BE @ 3.2ghz
ATi HD4870
4gb Gskill DDR2
Win 7 x64
LR3.2
CS3


I think the whole PC vs Mac thing is just a matter of preference and budget. Since I do alot of gaming and have been a heavy PC user for almost 15 years I cant justify buying a Mac. At the same time I like alot of Apples mobile devices over the competition. I currently have an iPhone4, numerous iPods and the new 4th gen touch and Im currently holding out for the gen 2 iPad. I have 2 netbooks that both run windows 7 but I would like to pick up a used macbook in the future but I dont see it as anything more than a toy for me but since a few of my friends use Mac I would like to learn the OS. Its just hard to justify $1000-$2000 for a notebook when all I would use it for is skype and tuning my car.

I just get a whole lot more computer for my money building it myself.


5D3 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-568EX II | YN-622c | YN-622-TX |
Selling Sigma 30mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Atlandis
Senior Member
Avatar
486 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Nov 15, 2010 07:52 |  #49

mac stopped using nvidia graphic cards guys.. so there is no comparison here.

server pc the best platform for photoshop as Adobe supports only Nvidia cards.

I have a Q9400 with 4 giga ram and GTX480 :)

but in april the new socket sadybridge and new Intel cpu's are comming. I am going to upgrade then.


5D markII, 40d, 17-40 L, 70-200 f:2.8 L, 100mm f:2.8 macro, sigma 24-70, mp-e65, 2x 580EXII, MR-14X ring, Manfrotto 190xbpro+488 RC2, Pixma 9500pro

Flickr (external link) - Website (external link)
http://www.myoshinjuku​.org.uk/lesvos2009.htm​l (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Nov 15, 2010 08:26 |  #50

Atlandis wrote in post #11286785 (external link)
mac stopped using nvidia graphic cards guys.. so there is no comparison here. server pc the best platform for photoshop as Adobe supports only Nvidia cards.

Can you elaborate on this statement? Photoshop CS5 runs just fine on my iMac with an ATI card.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Atlandis
Senior Member
Avatar
486 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Nov 15, 2010 08:42 |  #51

Adobe added cuda extensions in adobe cs4-5

That means photoshop effect loadings and especially if you do manipulation, runs 10 times faster than any ati card.

Even if you put 10 ati cards, cant beat 1 NVIDIA with cuda. because cuda extensions allow GPU share the whole process with cpu.

with ati cards only cpu runs the rendering.


5D markII, 40d, 17-40 L, 70-200 f:2.8 L, 100mm f:2.8 macro, sigma 24-70, mp-e65, 2x 580EXII, MR-14X ring, Manfrotto 190xbpro+488 RC2, Pixma 9500pro

Flickr (external link) - Website (external link)
http://www.myoshinjuku​.org.uk/lesvos2009.htm​l (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Nov 15, 2010 08:43 |  #52

That's Adobe's fault, not Apple's or ATIs. FireStream supports OpenCL just fine. See my post to you in the SL thread.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Atlandis
Senior Member
Avatar
486 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Nov 15, 2010 08:50 |  #53

here is a link to find out ur self how MUCH faster is cuda vs none cuda graphic cards in cs4 and cs5 photoshop
http://www.tomshardwar​e.com …5-cuda-64-bit,2770-8.html (external link)

the graph with time table u see, the lower is better.

It is Apple fault too.. they supported Nvidia while ago! But some how they force you to use ATI only. I use the word "force" because the configurator does not allow you to pick a different graphic card and you have to pay an ATI. anyway.. I choose pc with NVIDIA :)..

cs5 is entirely cuda extension program.

Apple is using ATI because of 3d vision with 6 monitor support, photographers doesnt need that, videographers YES. So apple decided to be more pro for videographers.


5D markII, 40d, 17-40 L, 70-200 f:2.8 L, 100mm f:2.8 macro, sigma 24-70, mp-e65, 2x 580EXII, MR-14X ring, Manfrotto 190xbpro+488 RC2, Pixma 9500pro

Flickr (external link) - Website (external link)
http://www.myoshinjuku​.org.uk/lesvos2009.htm​l (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Nov 15, 2010 08:51 |  #54

Atlandis wrote in post #11287000 (external link)
Adobe added cuda extensions in adobe cs4-5

That means photoshop effect loadings and especially if you do manipulation, runs 10 times faster than any ati card.

Even if you put 10 ati cards, cant beat 1 NVIDIA with cuda. because cuda extensions allow GPU share the whole process with cpu.

with ati cards only cpu runs the rendering.

Really? Are you sure about that? Here is the list of items that the GPU HELPS with:

http://kb2.adobe.com/c​ps/405/kb405745.html (external link)

GPU features added in Photoshop CS5
GPU features in Photoshop CS4 and CS5
  • Zoom enhancements. Smooth display at all zoom levels and temporary zoom. See Zoom continuously (external link) and Temporarily zoom an image (external link).
  • Animated transitions for one-stop zoom. Press Ctrl+Plus Sign (Windows) or Command+Plus Sign to zoom, and the image animates slightly between zoom levels. This can be very subtle.
  • Flick-panning. Choose Edit > Preferences (Windows) or Photoshop > Preferences (Mac OS). In the General panel, select Enable Flick Panning. Then, select the Hand tool and click-flick the image, like a flick gesture on an iPhone. The image glides smoothly to the new position.
  • Rotate the canvas. See Use the Rotate View tool (external link) in Photoshop CS5 Help.
  • View nonsquare pixel images. See Adjust pixel aspect ratio (external link) in Photoshop CS5 Help.
  • Pixel grid. A pixel grid appears when zooming in more than 500% on an image. See Hide the pixel grid (external link) in Photoshop CS5 Help.
  • Adobe Color Engine (ACE). Color conversions are faster because the processing is handled by the GPU instead of the CPU.
  • Draw Brush tip cursors. Choose Edit > Preferences (Windows) or Photoshop > Preferences (Mac OS). In the Cursors panel, choose a Brush Preview color. Then, when you interactively adjust the size or hardness of the Brush tool, the preview color displays the change in real time. See Resize or change hardness of cursors by dragging (external link) in Photoshop CS5 Help.
  • 3D Axis. See 3D Axis (Photoshop Extended) (external link) in Photoshop CS5 Help.
  • 3D Lights. See 3D Lights settings (Photoshop Extended) (external link) in Photoshop CS5 Help.
  • 3D acceleration

Now, how many of THOSE items do you use on a daily basis. Still think it is 10 times faster?


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Nov 15, 2010 08:53 |  #55

Atlandis wrote in post #11287041 (external link)
here is a link to find out ur self how MUCH faster is cuda vs none cuda graphic cards in cs4 and cs5 photoshop

It is Apple fault too.. they supported Nvidia while ago! But some how they force you to use ATI only.

I understand that clearly. But the problem is that Adobe, for whatever reason, has chosen to not leverage OpenCL, which would obviate the need to directly code for either CUDA or FireStream. Under OS X, applications that are written for OpenCL will leverage the gpu for its functions, regardless of whether it is an NVidia (CUDA) or ATI (FireStream) gpu (this is the whole point of OpenCL - hardware independence). Again, Pixelmator smokes Photoshop CS5 in terms of sheer speed. In addition, very few parts of Photoshop CS5 even use the gpu. Most of them are cpu-only; Adobe is stuck in the past when it comes to writing code.

Again, blame Adobe, not ATI or Apple.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Atlandis
Senior Member
Avatar
486 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Nov 15, 2010 09:17 |  #56

I understand that, well I do manipulation too.. and when Adobe decides to support ATI, I will may think of it, may not.

as Nvidia makes much stronger 1 core gpus than ATI, ATI is cheaper. not to speak about tessellation. the newest ATI 6970 got 1930 shaders and the old GTX480 got 3000.. this are advanced things and off topic for this matter anyways.

and compared with the gtx285 that apple used before? 5770 is nothing. I found very expensive apple now.. even more expensive for what they give you as a hardware.. personal opinion.

in the other hand, mac pro is a server pc with mac os right? is much better to built up your own server pc you pay the half with 200% better hardware but you miss the apple :)

ps: ATI got 3dvision with 6 monitor support, but Nvidia supports 3 monitors.. I am not going to buy more than 2!! :p (humor)


5D markII, 40d, 17-40 L, 70-200 f:2.8 L, 100mm f:2.8 macro, sigma 24-70, mp-e65, 2x 580EXII, MR-14X ring, Manfrotto 190xbpro+488 RC2, Pixma 9500pro

Flickr (external link) - Website (external link)
http://www.myoshinjuku​.org.uk/lesvos2009.htm​l (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Avatar
3,695 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Durt Burg, WV
     
Nov 15, 2010 09:39 |  #57

Tony-S wrote in post #11287056 (external link)
I understand that clearly. But the problem is that Adobe, for whatever reason, has chosen to not leverage OpenCL, which would obviate the need to directly code for either CUDA or FireStream. Under OS X, applications that are written for OpenCL will leverage the gpu for its functions, regardless of whether it is an NVidia (CUDA) or ATI (FireStream) gpu (this is the whole point of OpenCL - hardware independence). Again, Pixelmator smokes Photoshop CS5 in terms of sheer speed. In addition, very few parts of Photoshop CS5 even use the gpu. Most of them are cpu-only; Adobe is stuck in the past when it comes to writing code.

Again, blame Adobe, not ATI or Apple.

Atlandis wrote in post #11287177 (external link)
I understand that, well I do manipulation too.. and when Adobe decides to support ATI, I will may think of it, may not.

as Nvidia makes much stronger 1 core gpus than ATI, ATI is cheaper. not to speak about tessellation. the newest ATI 6970 got 1930 shaders and the old GTX480 got 3000.. this are advanced things and off topic for this matter anyways.

and compared with the gtx285 that apple used before? 5770 is nothing. I found very expensive apple now.. even more expensive for what they give you as a hardware.. personal opinion.

in the other hand, mac pro is a server pc with mac os right? is much better to built up your own server pc you pay the half with 200% better hardware but you miss the apple :)

ps: ATI got 3dvision with 6 monitor support, but Nvidia supports 3 monitors.. I am not going to buy more than 2!! :p (humor)

Didn't one of the mods already say that this thread is about what type of computer you use and not a Mac vs. PC flame war?


My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sean
Goldmember
Avatar
1,714 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Nov 15, 2010 09:40 |  #58

C2D 6750 Conroe @ 2.66, 4GB of DDR2 @ 800mhz, XFX 8600 GT Stock, Windows 7 Pro.

I use LR3 and DPP and the Odd PS.


Canon 50D - 17-55mm F2.8 IS - 300mm F4L IS - 70-200mm F4L IS - 50mm F1.8 - 580EX II & 430EX - Full Gear Listing
Flickr (external link) - C&C Always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10119
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Nov 15, 2010 09:46 |  #59

Add it to the graveyard of dozens of threads with the same title and same arguments...

https://photography-on-the.net …t=671374&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=132044&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=631704&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=605375&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=916757&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=889608&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=854826&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=704706&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=696421&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=586215&highli​ght=mac+pc
https://photography-on-the.net …t=244153&highli​ght=mac+pc


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,162 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
Mac or PC?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1261 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.