Had a 70-200 2.8 non is so was worried that ver 2 might not be worth the money boy was i wrong
 | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Hand held crop
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
L.Morey Goldmember  1,571 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto Ca More info | Oct 26, 2010 21:52 | #1 Had a 70-200 2.8 non is so was worried that ver 2 might not be worth the money boy was i wrong
Hand held crop
7d gripped,40d gripped,G9,17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8 L, 70-200f2.8 mkll L, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L, 50f1.4 , 85f1.8 , Sigma 24-70f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonSC Senior Member 686 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: NY More info | Oct 26, 2010 21:59 | #2 Congrats! This lens is incredible.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 26, 2010 23:51 | #3 Thanks 7d gripped,40d gripped,G9,17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8 L, 70-200f2.8 mkll L, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L, 50f1.4 , 85f1.8 , Sigma 24-70f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yagimax Goldmember  More info | Glad you like it. It's on my want list! Sony A7RII, FE16-35, FE35 2.8, FE90 macro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TT-00 Member  195 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Washington More info | Just sold my 70-200 F4 non IS....thinking about this lens....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kostyan Member 51 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Russia, Moscow More info | Oct 27, 2010 09:29 | #6 TT-00 wrote in post #11174068  Just sold my 70-200 F4 non IS....thinking about this lens.... What about 4l IS image quality vs 2.8 (IS or II IS)? Gear: 50D/Sigma 30mm 1.4/Canon 85mm 1.8/EX580II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Djhyper66 Member 62 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Orange County , California More info | hahah, mine come in the mail today, can't wait for the brown truck to drive by!!! My toys:Canon G12, Canon 7D gripped, speedlite 580exII, EF 28-135, EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 , EF 50 mm 1.8, EF 100 mm f/2.8L IS. 70-200 2.8 IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
slowsnapper Member 68 posts Joined Aug 2010 More info | Oct 27, 2010 09:59 | #8 The pictures show beautiful detail. I'm new to photography and totally confused about lenses but am wanting a new one. Can someone tell me the difference between the two lenses spoken of?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
12joi Hatchling  6 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Iceland More info | Oct 27, 2010 10:01 | #9 Congrats. Canon EOS 7D, EFS 17-55mm 2,8 IS USM, EFS 18-135mm 1:3,5-5,6 IS, EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM, EF 50mm 1,8 II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop  14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Oct 27, 2010 11:11 | #10 I tested my 70-200 F4IS against the MK2 I got a couple of weeks ago. There is a thread somewhere ttiled .........MKII vs 135L (I added the other comparison) Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlintz Senior Member  614 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Midwest More info | Oct 27, 2010 11:51 | #11 bohdank wrote in post #11174661 I tested my 70-200 F4IS against the MK2 I got a couple of weeks ago. There is a thread somewhere ttiled .........MKII vs 135L (I added the other comparison) They are extremely close as far as sharpness but one of the GREAT things about the MKII is the color and contrast. Better than my 135L, imo. Agreed, which makes me think of selling my 135L. Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TT-00 Member 195 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Washington More info | Oct 27, 2010 11:53 | #12 Kostyan wrote in post #11174125 What about 4l IS image quality vs 2.8 (IS or II IS)? With the current rebate of $200 I rather get the II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1024 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
