Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 29 Aug 2005 (Monday) 13:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Raw Post Processing Blues

 
mdm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,783 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2005
     
Aug 29, 2005 13:44 |  #1

I'll tell you how bad I am at post processing. I just finished loading about 15 pictures on the computer. I used RSE to adjust. When I was done I created the jpegs. My wife was passing by and said that it seems like I have dropped my camera because none of my pictures looked good any more. Really since I started shooting raw. It kinda took the wind out of my sails but I am determined to hang in there and learn raw post processing. Is there a guide, book, thread that will help me in the basics of post processing? Any tips, ideas, suggestions are welcome.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 29, 2005 13:50 |  #2

My lady uses my camera. I tell her to set auto levels (exposure, shadows etc), open the file then bump contrast +10 - then do a USM of 300 and .04.

She seems to do ok with those simple settings.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfcRebel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,252 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
     
Aug 29, 2005 14:53 |  #3

mdm wrote:
My wife was passing by and said that it seems like I have dropped my camera because none of my pictures looked good any more. Really since I started shooting raw. It kinda took the wind out of my sails but I am determined to hang in there and learn raw post processing.

Same issue here. I have switched back and forth between JPEG and RAW many times i suck at PP. I'm still reading Chapter 1 in the PS CS tutorials. To make u feel better, i just learned how to remove red eyes using PS this past Saturday. :(
The PP learning curve is soooo deep for me, but i shall conquer it one day.


Fee

Canon | SIGMA | TAMRON | Kenko | Amvona

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Desertraptor
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,550 posts
Gallery: 212 photos
Likes: 395
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Aug 29, 2005 18:32 |  #4

Jpeg seems to have a lot more contrast I found which makes the colour more vivid so now when I shoot RAW in PP I ad a new layer for Brightness/Contrast, select vivd and adjust till I like it. Not always though


Peter
Canon 6D|60D|40D
Lens 10-22mm f2.8|50mm f 1.8|100mm f2.8 Macro

24-70mm f2.8|L100-400mm f4.5-5.6L
Flash 430EX II
Telescope Skywatcher 600mm ED80 f7.5 GEM EQ3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jfrancho
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,341 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Aug 29, 2005 19:28 |  #5

Try this book out: http://www.amazon.com …v=glance&s=book​s&n=507846 (external link)
There is a version for PS CS as well, same author. This book really solidified my raw workflow.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,783 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2005
     
Aug 29, 2005 21:48 |  #6

Thanks all. I like the white balance for raw and feel ok with that. I need to work on understanding the sharpening. Oh yea and everything else.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Aug 29, 2005 22:48 as a reply to  @ mdm's post |  #7

mdm wrote:
Thanks all. I like the white balance for raw and feel ok with that. I need to work on understanding the sharpening. Oh yea and everything else.

Learning the post processing of RAW images can sometimes be undaunting but in the end it will be well worth it. The real trick is to get your images exposed properly to begin with and then doing just a straight conversion without alot of tweaking. It is just a matter of practising. Don't give up.

FWIW, I very rarely ever use the sharpening in the RAW conversion. I always do this in photoshop as one of the last steps.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Aug 30, 2005 07:42 as a reply to  @ ssim's post |  #8

Set your camera up as you would for jpeg with your usual parameters. Then shoot raw. If you select "settings as shot", you Raw conversions should be identical to your jpegs. Then you can go back and convert again(as many times as you want) adjusting different parameters. Usually the only thing I adjust in conversion is Exposure and White Balance. My camera settings are all Neutral(0).


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Aug 30, 2005 11:55 as a reply to  @ cosworth's post |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

cosworth wrote:
My lady uses my camera. I tell her to set auto levels (exposure, shadows etc), open the file then bump contrast +10 - then do a USM of 300 and .04.

She seems to do ok with those simple settings.

A USM of amount 300 and pixel radius of 0.04? That small a pixel radius won't do anything. I set sharpening to 0 during raw conversion and use amount 375 and pixel radius of 1 for ISO 100 images at 0 threshold.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jfrancho
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,341 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Aug 30, 2005 12:05 |  #10

The documentation (external link) that goes along with the TLR Sharpening Toolkit (external link) has an excellent explanation of how Unsharp Mask works.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Aug 30, 2005 12:35 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #11

Hellashot wrote:
A USM of amount 300 and pixel radius of 0.04? That small a pixel radius won't do anything. I set sharpening to 0 during raw conversion and use amount 375 and pixel radius of 1 for ISO 100 images at 0 threshold.

Maybe not on your pictures, but it works just enough for mine. It actually does something that my eyes see as pleasant.

Overly sharp pictures do not print that well (4x6) imho.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Aug 30, 2005 15:30 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #12

Hellashot wrote:
A USM of amount 300 and pixel radius of 0.04? That small a pixel radius won't do anything.

Actually it can do quite a bit. You've obviously never tried it. Funny how one can form "knowledge" with no experience.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,790 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Raw Post Processing Blues
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
968 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.