Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 27 Oct 2010 (Wednesday) 15:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

You don't need a telescope

 
Davenn
Senior Member
Avatar
991 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Likes: 490
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 04, 2016 19:31 |  #1936

basketballfreak6 wrote in post #17959466 (external link)
thanks mate! i don't know how to describe how dark...but i am about half hour drive from city centre if that means anything haha

but suburb i live definitely not that bright...most light would be from street lights


G'day mate, greetings from the seriously light polluted Sydney
I can drive an hour from home and still not get out of the yellow zone :-(

here's the Brisbane region for you from this site
http://darksitefinder.​com/maps/world.html (external link)


cheers
Dave

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/04/1/LQ_785406.jpg
Image hosted by forum (785406) © Davenn [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

A picture is worth 1000 words ;)
Canon 5D3, 6D, 700D, a bunch of lenses and other bits, ohhh and some Pentax stuff ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Davenn
Senior Member
Avatar
991 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Likes: 490
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 04, 2016 19:34 |  #1937

artyman wrote in post #17960848 (external link)
The best argument for intelligent life is that they have the sense to avoids us :D


Love that !!!


A picture is worth 1000 words ;)
Canon 5D3, 6D, 700D, a bunch of lenses and other bits, ohhh and some Pentax stuff ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basketballfreak6
Goldmember
1,561 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3485
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Post edited over 7 years ago by basketballfreak6.
     
Apr 05, 2016 06:06 |  #1938

Davenn wrote in post #17960924 (external link)
G'day mate, greetings from the seriously light polluted Sydney
I can drive an hour from home and still not get out of the yellow zone :-(

here's the Brisbane region for you from this site
http://darksitefinder.​com/maps/world.html (external link)

cheers
Dave

Hosted photo: posted by Davenn in
./showthread.php?p=179​60924&i=i22171358
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

that's awesome Dave thanks for the link!

i am in yellow zone :P


https://www.tonyliupho​tography.com.au/ (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/tonyliuphotography​/ (external link)
flickr (external link)
R6, M6II, modified 77D, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II f/2.8, 70-200L IS II f/2.8, S150-600 f/5-6.3 C, S14 f/1.8 ART, S50 f/1.4 ART, S135 f/1.8 ART, 100L IS Macro f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ A. ­ Rust
Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity
375 posts
Gallery: 229 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1105
Joined Dec 2015
Location: Dallas, Texas
     
Apr 05, 2016 07:10 |  #1939

Davenn wrote in post #17960924 (external link)
G'day mate, greetings from the seriously light polluted Sydney
I can drive an hour from home and still not get out of the yellow zone :-(

here's the Brisbane region for you from this site
http://darksitefinder.​com/maps/world.html (external link)

cheers
Dave

Hosted photo: posted by Davenn in
./showthread.php?p=179​60924&i=i22171358
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

Hi, Dave... I've been using that site for quite a while. My backyard, where I take most of my photos, is in a bright red area equivalent to downtown Brisbane. It takes me about an hour just to get TO a yellow zone. And it's over three hours to a medium brown area - but once there, the visibility makes it worth the drive. I just have to try not to forget something important - like my camera, which I left on my son's dining table when I went up there with him the first time. ;( We used his point-and-shoot.

Now that it's warming up, I hope to get back out there again pretty soon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Davenn
Senior Member
Avatar
991 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Likes: 490
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 07, 2016 18:20 |  #1940

Roy A. Rust wrote in post #17961394 (external link)
Hi, Dave... I've been using that site for quite a while. My backyard, where I take most of my photos, is in a bright red area equivalent to downtown Brisbane. It takes me about an hour just to get TO a yellow zone. And it's over three hours to a medium brown area - but once there, the visibility makes it worth the drive. I just have to try not to forget something important - like my camera, which I left on my son's dining table when I went up there with him the first time. ;( We used his point-and-shoot.

Now that it's warming up, I hope to get back out there again pretty soon.


Hi Roy

yeah I hear you on that one likewise here, it's the pits :-(


Dave


A picture is worth 1000 words ;)
Canon 5D3, 6D, 700D, a bunch of lenses and other bits, ohhh and some Pentax stuff ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
10,865 posts
Gallery: 2817 photos
Likes: 18279
Joined Dec 2011
     
Apr 07, 2016 18:49 |  #1941

Where i shoot from its a back yard and in the dark brown zone so i guess not to bad?


P.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ A. ­ Rust
Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity
375 posts
Gallery: 229 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1105
Joined Dec 2015
Location: Dallas, Texas
     
Apr 07, 2016 22:09 |  #1942

Pagman wrote in post #17964113 (external link)
Where i shoot from its a back yard and in the dark brown zone so i guess not to bad?


P.

Talk about lucky. You apparently have readily available what most of us strive for, and drive hours to get to! The closest and only dark brown zone in Texas is in the Big Bend National Park - about 4 or 5 hours from here. There are quite a few medium brown areas in west Texas, but no dark browns. I'd love to see the Milky Way from your back yard.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
10,865 posts
Gallery: 2817 photos
Likes: 18279
Joined Dec 2011
     
Apr 07, 2016 22:18 |  #1943

Roy A. Rust wrote in post #17964287 (external link)
Talk about lucky. You apparently have readily available what most of us strive for, and drive hours to get to! The closest and only dark brown zone in Texas is in the Big Bend National Park - about 4 or 5 hours from here. There are quite a few medium brown areas in west Texas, but no dark browns. I'd love to see the Milky Way from your back yard.


Am i working out the above chart correct going from very light - white/grey/red/light brown/dark brown/then yellow/greens and blues for very dark? i am in a dark brown area.

P.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ A. ­ Rust
Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity
375 posts
Gallery: 229 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1105
Joined Dec 2015
Location: Dallas, Texas
Post edited over 7 years ago by Roy A. Rust.
     
Apr 08, 2016 08:01 |  #1944

Pagman wrote in post #17964302 (external link)
Am i working out the above chart correct going from very light - white/grey/red/light brown/dark brown/then yellow/greens and blues for very dark? i am in a dark brown area.

P.

Semi-right, but you have the yellows, greens, and blues in the wrong order. Dave's capture of Dark Site Finder, above, should show you the scale of light to dark. The further from downtown Brisbane you get, the darker it gets (Except for isolated towns in the Outback that have lighter areas around them.). The brightest area in his capture is the bright red, and progressively gets darker as it moves from that area to the Outback, which is dark brown, and is the darkest zone I've found anywhere on the world map provided by DSF. Brighter zones show up in cities larger than Brisbane, like Dallas, Tx., which continue from the bright red indicated for downtown Brisbane, through light grey to white, as shown for downtown Dallas.

So, with you being in a dark brown area, you are in a place as dark as anywhere on Earth, except for a cave or thick forest!

EDIT - Apr 14, 2016
For Pagman, and anyone else having trouble relating DSF's legend to the maps, I found the perfect example to show the brightest area to the darkest... For some reason, DSF indicates a very bright area a little way off the coast of Equatorial Guinea, on the west coast of Africa. I couldn't see any island in DSF, so I checked on Google Earth, and still didn't find any source for a bright light. But it does make a perfect bulls-eye with the brightest area in the center, and the darkest area a bit inland. It just gets progressively darker as the zones get further from the center.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/04/2/LQ_787348.jpg
Image hosted by forum (787348) © Roy A. Rust [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Apr 13, 2016 21:32 |  #1945

The Moon captured an hour ago.

Sony A7RII, Tamron 150-600mm + Sigma 1.4x TC, 840mm
Near 100% crop processed in ACR and PS CC.

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1488/26145216200_d442b5afd3_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FQn4​TE  (external link) Moon 4-13-16 Sony A7RII Tamron 150-600 840mm (external link) by gabebalazs (external link), on Flickr

SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Apr 13, 2016 21:35 |  #1946

Davenn wrote in post #17960924 (external link)
G'day mate, greetings from the seriously light polluted Sydney
I can drive an hour from home and still not get out of the yellow zone :-(

here's the Brisbane region for you from this site
http://darksitefinder.​com/maps/world.html (external link)

cheers
Dave

Hosted photo: posted by Davenn in
./showthread.php?p=179​60924&i=i22171358
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

That map brings back memories from my stargazing days (with a Meade ETX 125 UHTC, and an 8" dob). The situation isn't much better here in Toledo, OH, I think the best available locations within 3-4 hours of drive are still in the green zone.


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
heldGaze
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Apr 15, 2016 02:14 |  #1947

gabebalazs wrote in post #17971114 (external link)
The Moon captured an hour ago.

Sony A7RII, Tamron 150-600mm + Sigma 1.4x TC, 840mm
Near 100% crop processed in ACR and PS CC.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FQn4​TE  (external link) Moon 4-13-16 Sony A7RII Tamron 150-600 840mm (external link) by gabebalazs (external link), on Flickr

So that's effectively at 840mm? Great work! Aside from the obvious clarity concerns in a moon shot, what I really look for is an interesting terminator, and this image certainly has one. The way that the dark edge of the Sea of Serenity has a few peaks catching sunlight, creating that curvaceous lunar terminator is really beautiful to me.

Just a side note, an interesting terminator is something you obviously cannot achieve when shooting a full moon. While a full moon is beautiful in its own right, you also lose any shadows that would otherwise be cast by the craters themselves, creating something of a flat scene. Whereas in a photo like the one you have created here, you get interesting local contrasts as peaks catch light and valleys are in their shadows.


Cameras: Sony α7R II, Canon 40D, Samsung Galaxy S7
Lenses: Canon 11-24mm f/4 L, 24-70mm f/2.8 L II, 50mm f/1.8 II, Sigma 18-200mm
Telescope: Meade LXD55 SN-6" F=762mm f/5, with a 2x Barlow T-Mount
Retired Cameras: Canon SD300, Nokia N95, Galaxy S, S3 & S4
C&C Always Appreciated

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Apr 15, 2016 07:15 |  #1948

heldGaze wrote in post #17972448 (external link)
So that's effectively at 840mm? Great work! Aside from the obvious clarity concerns in a moon shot, what I really look for is an interesting terminator, and this image certainly has one. The way that the dark edge of the Sea of Serenity has a few peaks catching sunlight, creating that curvaceous lunar terminator is really beautiful to me.

Just a side note, an interesting terminator is something you obviously cannot achieve when shooting a full moon. While a full moon is beautiful in its own right, you also lose any shadows that would otherwise be cast by the craters themselves, creating something of a flat scene. Whereas in a photo like the one you have created here, you get interesting local contrasts as peaks catch light and valleys are in their shadows.

Thank you.
You're right about the full moon. I don't think I ever photographed the full moon, maybe except during an eclipse. It's interesting how outside of these "specialist" moon/astronomy topics, so many people post the full moon (on Flickr, Facebook, etc.) and don't even bother taking photos of a half moon where you could actually see craters and mountains :)


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Celestron.
     
Apr 15, 2016 08:52 |  #1949

gabebalazs wrote in post #17972570 (external link)
It's interesting how outside of these "specialist" moon/astronomy topics, so many people post the full moon (on Flickr, Facebook, etc.) and don't even bother taking photos of a half moon where you could actually see craters and mountains :)

If you edit a full moon image correctly you can see all kinds if craters that you can't see with a half moon so to speak . Actually is the biggest misconception taken by all people who look at the moon . When we see supposedly a Full Moon your only seeing half the moon and that's the side that faces earth . When we supposedly see Half a Moon your actually only seeing a quarter moon because half you don't see on the back side and only half of the front side actually makes that a quarter moon . Now you can tell people who don't understand what an actual quarter moon really is . ;)

http://apod.nasa.gov …FullMoon2012083​0smith.jpg (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Apr 15, 2016 09:16 |  #1950

Celestron wrote in post #17972638 (external link)
If you edit a full moon image correctly you can see all kinds if craters that you can't see with a half moon so to speak . Actually is the biggest misconception taken by all people who look at the moon . When we see supposedly a Full Moon your only seeing half the moon and that's the side that faces earth . When we supposedly see Half a Moon your actually only seeing a quarter moon because half you don't see on the back side and only half of the front side actually makes that a quarter moon . Now you can tell people who don't understand what an actual quarter moon really is . ;)

http://apod.nasa.gov …FullMoon2012083​0smith.jpg (external link)

While there are two quarter moons(first and last) during each moon orbit, the original definition came from the position of the moon in its orbit. One quarter of the way and last quarter to completion.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

936,508 views & 844 likes for this thread, 432 members have posted to it and it is followed by 106 members.
You don't need a telescope
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1634 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.