Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 30 Oct 2010 (Saturday) 21:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do you do everything in PS or still something in ACR?

 
mrmarks
Senior Member
822 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2010
     
Oct 30, 2010 21:50 |  #1

With all the adjustment tools in ACR available in Photoshop CS5, do you do all your editing in PS or still some adjustments in ACR? Please elaborate on your reasons. Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkedAddled
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 1472
Joined Jul 2008
Location: West Michigan
     
Oct 30, 2010 23:00 |  #2

I use ACR for initial tweaking such as exposure, blacks, and WB correction, then use PS for what ACR can't do, such as sharpening, layers, Gaussian, etc.

I'm still a complete newbie to PS and ACR, though.


Craig5D4|50D|S3iS|AF:Canon 28-135 USM IS|MF:Tamron SP 28-80|Tamron SP 60-300|Soligor 75-260|Soligor 400|Soligor C/D 500|Zuiko 50 f/1.8|others
Support this exceptional forum
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard?!?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 30, 2010 23:39 |  #3

95% of my images never go into PS, they go straight from ACR to jpeg. ACR can do all the basic adjustments, quickly or in batches, and CS4 up can do some complex stuff too. I use PS only for removing objects, swapping eyes, that sort of thing.

ACR is faster as it can work on batches of images at a time.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 31, 2010 01:06 |  #4

Well, I'd say that anyone who owns CS5 owes it to themselves to learn how to use them to get the most out of their photography. There is a learning curve to each -- for a time you may spend more time in ACR, then more time in Photoshop, and in time each of us can settle down to what works best for us as a workflow.

As you see above, many of us have settled into the Raw converter for the bulk of our workflow because for the type of photography we do, a good Raw conversion is all we need for nearly all our images. But I think you'll find that many of us who have been doing photo processing over a number of years have put plenty of time into Photoshop -- we know what it's capable of (even though some of us have settled on an older version and are "skipping" all the fancy new stuff:)).

So, if a lot of people check in here you'll get both points of view/workflows, neither is "better" then the other, as long as you learn to get the most out of what you have. There is a reason why those of us who shoot Raw frequently stay in the Raw processor, and that's because we love to bring the best out of our images, what we actually capture, and Raw and Raw processing is all about that. And there are reasons why so many people who love Photoshop spend a lot of time in their, because Photoshop can work "image magic" that goes beyond the capabilities of a Raw processor, and do things that would otherwise be, well, not possible!

So, I may not have answered your question -- I myself am a 95%+ Lightroom user (it shares the same processing engine as ACR) but I have Photoshop at the ready, whether to "play" or to get something "serious" done.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 31, 2010 04:22 |  #5

Photoshop used to be the main tool for photographers, but over the past 5 years it's really moved to ACR/Lightroom. Working in batches is a HUGE time saver, even just not having to open files individually is really really helpful. If I had to process files one by one i'd probably stop taking photos.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 31, 2010 04:25 |  #6

tim wrote in post #11197074 (external link)
Photoshop used to be the main tool for photographers, but over the past 5 years it's really moved to ACR/Lightroom. Working in batches is a HUGE time saver, even just not having to open files individually is really really helpful. If I had to process files one by one i'd probably stop taking photos.

Heh! Remember the "good old days":)?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 31, 2010 04:32 |  #7

The old days come faster in the digital world. People in my local professional society were surprised to hear i've never shot a frame of film in an SLR. Well, actually, one frame with my flatmates camera to say I had, but none professionally.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 31, 2010 09:50 |  #8

mrmarks wrote in post #11195904 (external link)
With all the adjustment tools in ACR available in Photoshop CS5, do you do all your editing in PS or still some adjustments in ACR? Please elaborate on your reasons. Thanks

I think it's the other way around actually: lot of the PS adjustment tools now appear in ACR...

IMO, anything that can be done in the raw converter, should be done in the raw converter.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Oct 31, 2010 10:27 |  #9

mrmarks wrote in post #11195904 (external link)
With all the adjustment tools in ACR available in Photoshop CS5, do you do all your editing in PS or still some adjustments in ACR?

You've got it backwards.... I do all the fundamental adjustments in ACR, but with every new version of ACR, I'm able to do more and more creative work in ACR that formerly was only possible in Photoshop.

I don't use LightRoom, but I know this goes even more so for LR vs PS.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeporterinmd
Member
123 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 104
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
     
Nov 02, 2010 00:31 |  #10

mrmarks wrote in post #11195904 (external link)
With all the adjustment tools in ACR available in Photoshop CS5, do you do all your editing in PS or still some adjustments in ACR? Please elaborate on your reasons. Thanks

ACR is getting more and more tools. Color adjustments, curves, brushes, clone, spot removal, quality sharpening with masks, lens and camera profiles, etc. I use the photoshop tools for image conversion, but launch them from bridge.

Mike


Gear: Fujifilm: X-S10, XF16 f1.4 R WR, XF18-55 f2.8-4 R LM OIS, XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS, KamLan: 50mm f1.1, Pergear 7.5mm f2.8, 25mm,35mm,50mm F1.6 or so, Laowa 9mm f2.8, 65mm f2.8, Canon 300mm f4 L nFD, Nikon: 28mm f2.8 AiS, 50mm f2.0 Ai | URLS: Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,603 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Do you do everything in PS or still something in ACR?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1470 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.