Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 03 Nov 2010 (Wednesday) 07:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How Do You Manage Manual Flash at Receptions?

 
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 04, 2010 07:34 |  #16

Though it's actually a little OT, I'll say that I never warmed to the idea of using flash in the corners to bring up ambient. I'm always able to gather enough light to get to where I want to (2-3 stops under) with just available light. I like having the subject pop out a little, but well short of them looking like they're standing in a parking lot at night.

I'd like to use off-camera more during the reception, but I really like being very mobile during this portion of the day so I resist it. It obviously does look nicer, and this is why I work with two flashes (main off-camera and fill on) for the important moments. And I'll do some back lighting of the first dance or general dance floor shots. But other than that, it's on camera bounced off the ceiling with a large bounce card.

And soon to be ETTL with spot metering and exposure lock!


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 04, 2010 07:52 |  #17

You do realize that flash power is adjustable, don't you? Putting them in the corners doesn't mean it looks like Yankee Stadium.

Even if you do light the place brightly, that's no different from shooting in a venue that's well lit on its own.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jerrybsmith
Senior Member
Avatar
299 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
     
Nov 04, 2010 09:58 |  #18

I've fallen for one flash off camera and another on using the latest Pocketwizards. What I end up with is directional light from the off-camera flash to fill in the people behind with the subjects lit correctly with the on-camera flash. Looks 10 times better than one flash.


www.jerrybsmith.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 04, 2010 10:37 |  #19

cdifoto wrote in post #11222935 (external link)
You do realize that flash power is adjustable, don't you? Putting them in the corners doesn't mean it looks like Yankee Stadium.

Even if you do light the place brightly, that's no different from shooting in a venue that's well lit on its own.

Understood, of course. But I even like how the colors of the light mix; good light with proper WB on the subject against the warm tones of the darker background. It's intentional (and easier).

I would do this if the place were simply too dark to acheive the balance I'm looking for, but that hasn't happened yet.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 04, 2010 10:39 |  #20

jerrybsmith wrote in post #11223495 (external link)
I've fallen for one flash off camera and another on using the latest Pocketwizards. What I end up with is directional light from the off-camera flash to fill in the people behind with the subjects lit correctly with the on-camera flash. Looks 10 times better than one flash.

This is how I do the bouquet and garter toss; it delivers a fairly even amount of light across a broad area.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 04, 2010 15:38 as a reply to  @ Peacefield's post |  #21

form wrote in post #11222736 (external link)
I don't believe in generating ambient light anymore. I make directional light instead because it's more interesting and less plain, flat, standard, etc.

Generating ambient light? I consider ambient light any light I don't create, which I think is probably pretty accurate.

Do you mean you don't like lighting the whole room? What about for speeches? I used to use ambient for that, but ISO3200 F2.8 1/50th got old real quick, and some receptions are ISO1600 F2.8 1/10th. People can see fine, but the images come out pretty bad.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Dec 17, 2010 16:18 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #22

I think everyone has the same problem :) reception! reception! reception!

I hate reception!

Especially when reception and ceremony is in the same room grrrrrrrrrrr!

Every venue subdues their light to get the mood effect, but it gives me a heart attack! I am never satisfied with the quality it is acceptable and it looks good but never great to me, I should bring my studio lights for the ceremony at least :(


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Dec 17, 2010 21:47 |  #23

Not really. Reception is the easiest part. Ceremony is generally harder.

Armans Photography wrote in post #11470871 (external link)
=Arman's Photography;11470871]I think everyone has the same problem :) reception! reception! reception!

I hate reception!

Especially when reception and ceremony is in the same room grrrrrrrrrrr!

Every venue subdues their light to get the mood effect, but it gives me a heart attack! I am never satisfied with the quality it is acceptable and it looks good but never great to me, I should bring my studio lights for the ceremony at least :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Dec 18, 2010 07:22 |  #24

viet wrote in post #11472196 (external link)
Not really. Reception is the easiest part. Ceremony is generally harder.

I would tend to agree - far more relaxed, typically more navigation room, more time for setups, a variety of different things going on.... candids, humor, etc. Low light venues are not a problem with judicious use of external flash.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Dec 21, 2010 23:17 |  #25

When I am using ettl flash (I tend to use manual a lot at receptions) I found the results to be a little more predictable and stable by changing the flash metering to "average" instead of the default setting of "evaluative".

Manual on-camera flash isn't that hard either. Just like your set to +1 for a white dress and -1 for a black suit, you just add a stop if your subject is a bit further away and take away a stop if they're closer. It's even less sensitive to varying distance when you ceiling bounce off a moderately high surface.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Dec 22, 2010 06:51 |  #26

picturecrazy wrote in post #11494943 (external link)
I found the results to be a little more predictable and stable by changing the flash metering to "average" instead of the default setting of "evaluative".

It's even less sensitive to varying distance when you ceiling bounce off a moderately high surface.

Thanks for those insights, Lloyd. I'm surprised by the first comment; intuitively, I would have guessed the other way, but I'll do some experimenting.

Re: your other comment, I never even really thought about how little distance from camera to subject really change when you're bouncing.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Dec 22, 2010 11:57 |  #27

Glad I read through all these comments before I made my own. I was going to say exactly what Lloyd said about setting the metering to 'Average' when shooting an indoor reception. When I have my 5D and 580 EXII set up this way, I shoot with the camera in Manual mode and the flash in ETTL mode. Depending on the amount of ambient light in the room I normally shoot between 1000-1600 ISO. With the metering in Average mode, the flash is doing most of the work (and I always bounce it), giving me plenty of latitude to shoot with. For example, I've found that I can go from f2.8 at 1/40th up tp f2.8 at 1/160th and get almost identical shots. If I want to let in more ambient light I'll stick with the slower shutter speed and if I want to freeze more of the action (cake, garter, etc), I'll go with the faster shutter speeds. In other words, I've found that using Average metering and bounced flash has rarely, if ever, given me an unusable exposure when shooting indoors. I use this exact same setup even if I have an off-camera flash setup elsewhere in the room.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,442 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
How Do You Manage Manual Flash at Receptions?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1043 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.