Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 04 Nov 2010 (Thursday) 03:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Point and shoot astro photos

 
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 04, 2010 03:15 |  #1

While we're having a burst of themed posts, here's another.
Pictures to have been taken using a camera with integrated lens (point and shoot) either directly or through a telescope eyepiece (afocal). Webcams (and the pro-astro versions) don't qualify.

A couple from my S3IS

M42 (6x30sec ISO400)

IMAGE: http://lh4.ggpht.com/_ff6hYHhuw4Q/SOCdavAZmrI/AAAAAAAAAg4/PDaka3gPhBM/s400/M42.jpg

Jupiter & Saturn (Afocal through 8" SCT)
IMAGE: http://lh5.ggpht.com/_ff6hYHhuw4Q/SOCdLse2-GI/AAAAAAAAAgw/PIj3CoMClBU/s800/Jup_Sat.jpg

Steve.

"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 04, 2010 08:38 |  #2

Wow Steve, very impressive. Jupiter and Saturn are really excellent. I started out with a 2mp HP point and shoot, it didn't even have a zoom. :)

I'll have to dig deep to find my P&S shots but I'll see what I can come up with.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Nov 04, 2010 08:49 |  #3

Very nice Steve . Your Jupiter and Saturn images look great and qualifies to go into the thread i just started which said you could use any Canon camera which included PS (Pointand Shoot) as long as a scope was used whether EP (Eye-Piece Projection) or Afocal (AF) or Prime-Focus (PF) . I was hoping we would not have a double thread started .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bernoulli
Senior Member
Avatar
801 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Aug 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
     
Nov 04, 2010 09:13 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #4

This is not a great shot but it was important to rekindling my interest in lunar photography. In the 90's I shot the moon on Tech Pan and developed it in our guest bathroom at night. But my wife complained that the house smelled like vinegar ("No honey, that's stop bath"). So I got out of developing my own in about '98. Fast forward to 2005 when I have one of my early P&S cameras. So one night I decided to point it into the eyepiece and I got about four decent shots, and a bunch of crappy ones.

Well, that rebooted the hobby. This picture has cost me thousands of dollars since.

It's not a great image and I resisted editing it further today just for nostagia sake. I can do better now! The vignetting gave me some funky colors and my processing was pretty primitive then. But this shot holds a place in my heart.

Canon PowerShot S500, f/3.5, 1/25 sec through the eyepiece of a Celestron C8.

I think I remember that this camera did not have a manual mode and I had to point it at the porch light, hit exposure hold, then run to the scope and get my shot!

Anyway, another great idea for a thread and a chance for me to go down memory lane.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Rick
rulrich@uark.edu (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 04, 2010 13:31 |  #5

I hear you Ron and didn't just start the thread on a whim.
The emphasis is on the point and shoot camera and IMHO is of the same intent as Sorarses original proposal. ie. Something that "normal folk" can relate to and perhaps give astrophotography a go.
I think that the Orion nebula is the more significant image as it's a DSO taken with a consumer p/s. I might try and find the original data and see if i can extract a bit more out of it.

Rick - You sent me a brief nostalgia trip too. I recently found some hypered Tech Pan that I bought 20 years ago. It's been in the freezer all that time and transferred from house to house. That was about 2 weeks after I sold my A1. The M42 image above is also significant to me as one 30 sec frame looked very similar to a 20 minute image I took on slide film.
Maybe there's another themed thread coming - Film.

Steve.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Nov 04, 2010 14:05 |  #6

SteveInNZ wrote in post #11224669 (external link)
Maybe there's another themed thread coming - Film.

Steve.

Will it have to be with a Canon camera ? I have a Pentax K1000 and an OM1 but no Canon film camera .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Nov 04, 2010 18:24 |  #7

Celestron wrote in post #11224869 (external link)
Will it have to be with a Canon camera ? I have a Pentax K1000 and an OM1 but no Canon film camera .

If you post pictures taken with anything but a Canon, we'll whip you with a virtual wet noodle and think rude thoughts about what your cameras can do with themselves!!!


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 04, 2010 19:42 |  #8

Celestron wrote in post #11224869 (external link)
Will it have to be with a Canon camera ? I have a Pentax K1000 and an OM1 but no Canon film camera .

I don't have anything scanned to get the ball rolling so if you start the thread, you get to set the rules. I can't imagine that it's going to be a huge thread.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Nov 04, 2010 22:00 |  #9

SteveInNZ wrote in post #11226529 (external link)
I don't have anything scanned to get the ball rolling so if you start the thread, you get to set the rules. I can't imagine that it's going to be a huge thread.

I'll wait for now , since this is a Canon Digital Forum other ppl may get upset so maybe you need to ask around and see what ppls' thoughts are about it before hand .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bernoulli
Senior Member
Avatar
801 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Aug 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
     
Nov 04, 2010 22:09 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #10

If I could add my two cents worth, looking back over my old films, they pretty much suck compared to what I can do now with a >10 MP 14 bit digital camera.

It might be different for you deep space photographers, and I bet I'm about the only one in this forum that would have film of the Moon through a scope. They are nostalgic but far inferior in image quality to what many of us can do now routinely in our Canon SLR's.

I really like these themed threads. Maybe we don't always have to post our latest, but film may be a little too far back.

Just my opinion.


Rick
rulrich@uark.edu (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 04, 2010 23:56 |  #11

The first 7 images below were taken with a Nikon(gasp) Coolpix 4300 (4mpxl) point and shoot attached to various eyepieces using a Digi-T adapter system through my 10" Meade LX200. I do miss slewing slowly over the Moon's surface at high magnification with that scope, as close as I'll probably ever get to the view from a NASA orbit. Nothing like a trip down memory lane.

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Lunar%20Photography/Test/jp1.jpg

Venus
IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Astro%20Creative/Venusposter.jpg

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Astro%20Creative/View.jpg

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Astro%20Creative/View-1.jpg

Lunar Rilles
IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Lunar%20Photography/rilles.jpg

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Lunar%20Photography/tyclav-1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Lunar%20Photography/View-2.jpg

And last but not least is one of my very first astro images. Taken with a HP 318 (2mpxl) hand held over the eyepiece of my 5" Meade AR-5 refractor. Taken on July 17, 2003 @ 4 a.m EST.
IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/Lunar%20Photography/Test/lunamars.jpg

Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mtbdudex
Goldmember
Avatar
1,662 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 193
Joined Nov 2009
Location: SE Michigan
     
Nov 04, 2010 23:57 |  #12

I really like these themed threads.

Agree, IMO each of these themed threads needs to be a sticky.

Nice to see individual threads where people post their images and discussion goes on the techniques used/etc, these themed threads as a summary capture the heart and soul of this forum in neat way also.

Steve, I so like the "Phases of Luna" you've done, ok if I copy that concept with my images and my own PP'ing?


Mike R, P.E. ...iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone14Pro, AppleTV4K, MacBook
Canon: Body R5, lens RF 24-105mm L F4, RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L, 1.4 TC, EF 70-200 L f2.8 IS II / TC 1.4x 2x
FEISOL tripod CT-3441S + CB-40D Ball Head
My top 10 in Astrophotography. . .DIY acoustic panels (external link) . . APOD Aug-5-2011 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,693 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Point and shoot astro photos
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1565 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.