Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 Nov 2010 (Friday) 02:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

WOW some of the things I CANT do in lightroom are just unreal

 
slappy ­ sam
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Nov 05, 2010 02:26 |  #1

Okay, Lightroom 3 is probably the most advanced photo managing software on the planet, at least it seems really good to me. I hardly have to use photoshop at all anymore. HOWEVER, they have finally upgraded the watermark feature in lightroom yet I still can't simply overlay a PNG at it's native resolution. Instead I'm forced to guess by moving a dumb slider, which makes the font pixellate and look like crap. WHY can I not do this incredibly simple task?
vmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmad


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Nov 05, 2010 02:28 |  #2

Aperture's watermark support is worse. (if that's any consolation to you?)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Nov 05, 2010 02:29 |  #3

It's just that they spent all this time designing the watermark module and completely overlooked what I would assume most higher level photographers wish to do with their watermarks. Hopefully I get it in an update... my photos are going commando till then.

And that is actually consolation to me, haha just gotta wait till they figure it out now.


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Nov 05, 2010 02:42 |  #4

The thing that is killing me, while we're ranting... is in Aperture 3, while you can export nice watermarks, it does do pretty much what I need, but and this is a big butt, the watermarks are completely ignored if you the new social site integration with facebook, flickr, etc.. Can you believe that? Who the hell, using a pro photo app, would put images up on facebook without a watermark? The entire programming routine seems to just bypass your default export settings and sends out naked images.

Arggh!

8-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 05, 2010 03:08 |  #5

The solution is rather simple....start out with a logo that's large enough and you wouldn't have a problem with pixelation. If you stretch any bitmapped file too much it will break apart into individual pixels. For example, my cameras produce images that are about 4,000 pixels wide...so I made my logos with 2,000 x 400 pixels dimensions. This allows me to scale my logo to max. width if required without any pixelaton occurring.

While the PNG format supports transparent backgrounds it doesn't scale well...my wish is that Illustrator vector file formats (AI or EPS) was enabled in the watermarking module.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skygod44
"in stockings and suspenders"
Avatar
6,454 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 110
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo!
     
Nov 05, 2010 03:16 |  #6

PixelMagic wrote in post #11228535 (external link)
The solution is rather simple....start out with a logo that's large enough and you wouldn't have a problem with pixelation....

I was thinking the same thing.
I have several watermarks depending on the effect I'm after, and they are all max-size to begin with.
Try it, and you'll not stress again!
Regards,
Simon
:-)


"Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
6D/7D and ALL Canon/Sigma gear SOLD!!!! Now: Olympus PEN EP-5 & OM-D EM-5 Mk2 and 8 lenses!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Nov 05, 2010 03:54 |  #7

PixelMagic wrote in post #11228535 (external link)
While the PNG format supports transparent backgrounds it doesn't scale well...my wish is that Illustrator vector file formats (AI or EPS) was enabled in the watermarking module.

Isn't pdf supported?


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 05, 2010 04:15 |  #8

skygod44 wrote in post #11228556 (external link)
I was thinking the same thing.
I have several watermarks depending on the effect I'm after, and they are all max-size to begin with.
Try it, and you'll not stress again!
Regards,
Simon
:-)

Exactly; max size and high resolution is the way to go. Overlaying a 72 ppi watermark on a 240 ppi (Lightroom default resolution) image increases the likelihood of problems even if the watermark was made with the maximum image width.

René Damkot wrote in post #11228651 (external link)
Isn't pdf supported?

Lightroom only supports JPEG and PNG formats for watermarking through the Export dialog box.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Nov 05, 2010 05:00 |  #9

PixelMagic wrote in post #11228693 (external link)
Lightroom only supports JPEG and PNG formats for watermarking through the Export dialog box.

That's a bit silly. .pdf and .psd are supported for the Identity plate...
Mogrify does seem to support .tif and .psd. No idea wether it supports vectors though.
Have to give that a try some day.

Edit: Apparently, it doesn't...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Nov 05, 2010 11:39 |  #10

PixelMagic wrote in post #11228535 (external link)
The solution is rather simple....start out with a logo that's large enough and you wouldn't have a problem with pixelation. If you stretch any bitmapped file too much it will break apart into individual pixels. For example, my cameras produce images that are about 4,000 pixels wide...so I made my logos with 2,000 x 400 pixels dimensions. This allows me to scale my logo to max. width if required without any pixelaton occurring.

While the PNG format supports transparent backgrounds it doesn't scale well...my wish is that Illustrator vector file formats (AI or EPS) was enabled in the watermarking module.

I am outputting images with a maximum of 900px on the long edge. My watermark is 900px wide (its about 60px high, its a bar watermark). I wish to overlay it at it's native 1:1 ratio, but you can't do this in lightroom. I got it to do it for the horizontal images however when the vertical images come in it shrinks the watermark to fit. No way around this. See posts 4 and 5 for what I'm talking about, if my explanation didn't make sense - http://forums.adobe.co​m/message/3046136 (external link)

Basically instead of having lightroom resize my logo to be a ratio of a fill or what not, I just want it to keep the png file at it's native resolution and throw it on the bottom of each image. Don't touch it, just place it there. If some of the sides get cut off because my vertical image isn't 900px wide, that is fine. But lightroom insists upon resizing my watermark so it looks like crap.


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Nov 05, 2010 12:35 |  #11

Well, it's not a perfect solution, but you could just use a separate software to put the watermark onto the images. Faststone Resizer can do this (freebie from Faststone.org).

As I see it, LR3 is basically designed to make it as easy as possible to add a watermark. OP has a rather different approach... I think most users would prefer it to automatically scale the WM to fit different size images (just be sure the WM file is large enough for the largest image it ever needs to be added). Yep, it even scales as needed for vertical vs horizontal shots. And, since LR3 can control transparency easily with a slider, you can simply make any and all of your WM files "full strength". Just a different approach....

But maybe what you would like to be able to do is something Adobe might add in future versions, that you can set it to not scale the WM but simply trim it to fit.

I'm just happy to finally have an easy means of WMing in LR. WIth LR2 I used Faststone separately, with 50% transparency PNG files set up for different size output. But have now switched to using LR3 so watermarking can be fully combined with my lower-rez/thumbnail Export workflow, saving me time and extra steps. Yes, I did have to set up new watermark files for LR, but I didn't think is all that big a deal to do... it only took a few minutes. PNG or JPEG make sense to use for this, since their file size can be kept minimal and they are among the most widely supported in a variety of softwares. Not everyone has the softwares to produce a PDF or even a PSD file. Practically everyone has something installed that can produce a simple PNG and/or JPEG.

A lot of the time I suspect the people designing the software are pretty unfamiliar with its end use... Adobe is probably better at Beta and Release Candidate testing than most... But certainly not perfect. I noticed a lot of "glitches" in LR3 initially. The latest release candidate appears to address some, if not all of these.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Nov 05, 2010 12:45 |  #12

amfoto1 wrote in post #11230830 (external link)
Well, it's not perfect buy you can just use a separate software to put the watermark onto the images. Faststone Resizer can do this (freebie from Faststone.org).

As I see it, LR3 is basically designed to make it as easy as possible to add a watermark. It automatically scales it to fit different size images (just be sure your file is large enough for the largest image you ever need to watermark). It scales it as needed for vertical vs horizontal shots too. And since LR3 can control transparency easily with a slider, you can just make any and all of your watermark files "full strength".

I used to use Faststone, with 50% transparency PNG files set up for different size output. But have now switched to using LR3 so watermarking can be fully combined with my lower-rez/thumbnail Export workflow, saving me time and extra steps. Yes, I did have to set up new watermark files for LR, but I didn't think is all that big a deal to do... it only took a few minutes. PNG or JPEG make sense to use for this, since their file size can be kept minimal and they are among the most widely supported in a variety of softwares. Not everyone has the softwares to produce a PDF or even a PSD file. Practically everyone has something installed that can produce a simple PNG and/or JPEG.

Yeah its a very capable watermarking tool, but I just wish there was an option/checkbox for "do not scale my watermark". That's all I need. Should take a programmer an hour or so to implement...


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Nov 06, 2010 08:32 |  #13

Mogrify lets you add a graphical watermark and it has an option to disable resizing.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Nov 06, 2010 19:32 |  #14

hollis_f wrote in post #11235069 (external link)
Mogrify lets you add a graphical watermark and it has an option to disable resizing.

Yup, that's what I was using in LR2 and will continue to do in LR3 if I wish to keep watermarking... just wish they could build it into lightroom.


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Nov 06, 2010 20:01 |  #15

Well, you can put in a feature request with the LR team -- they do check those things. Maybe if you brought it up in the LR users forum and put in a request as well it might get some attention. Software has a way of evolving!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,280 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
WOW some of the things I CANT do in lightroom are just unreal
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1708 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.