Going to the aqurium in Atlanta tomorrow, want to take just one lens. Thinking either 85 F1.8 or 24-105 f4. Has anyone shot there and or what is good for that environment? Polorizer? Thanks for your help.
J.David Member 212 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Atlanta, Ga. More info | Nov 05, 2010 13:13 | #1 Going to the aqurium in Atlanta tomorrow, want to take just one lens. Thinking either 85 F1.8 or 24-105 f4. Has anyone shot there and or what is good for that environment? Polorizer? Thanks for your help. 1DmarkIII ,5DmarkIII,7DII, 5 D, 40D,10 D , Canon 28mm 1.8, 35 f2, 50mm 1.8,1.4 85 1.8,Tamron 24-70 2.8, Canon 70-200,300F 2.8is L L 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,730 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Nov 05, 2010 13:15 | #2 One focal length seems rather limiting. I used my 24-105 at the Montery Aquarium and was real happy with it's performance. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Nov 05, 2010 13:19 | #3 I would use as fast a lens as possible. The problem is 85mm is too long IMO. Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bradboob Member 93 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Hollidaysburg, PA More info | Nov 05, 2010 13:44 | #4 I agree you'll want your fastest lenses. f4 in a dark room with the only light coming from the water/glass will be too slow. The 85 1.8 should work good but you'll probably need some distance between you and the glass itself, and depending on how busy the aquarium will be that could be difficult to get an open shot. Looks like your 50mm 2.8 is your next best bet. I'd bring the 24-105L along for the shots that are in well lit rooms though, just in case. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Permanent banFast glass and high ISO would never work. F4. ISO 500. 1/200. You have to know how to use flash effectively. It may be too late to give you a crash course in single strobe photography to freeze actions under available light with good DOF. One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bigpow Senior Member 708 posts Likes: 15 Joined May 2002 More info | Nov 05, 2010 20:25 | #6 I'm interested in this as well. [5DM2: 50L, 100L, 24-105L, 70-200/2.8IS L II, Zeiss 2/35 ZE]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Nov 05, 2010 20:35 | #7 Permanent banbigpow wrote in post #11233185 I'm interested in this as well. I was quite upset when I went with 50/1.8 last time, it was too long, no IS, and soft at f/1.8 how do you use a single flash without getting all kinds of reflection? Assuming you can't get close enough to touch the lens to the glass. here's another thing is, using a flash (even the built-in) in some aquariums are prohibited. A lot of in-informed people (and some small amount of d-bags that don't care about the animals) often violate this rule.
One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sangjiny Senior Member 760 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:31 | #8 Fast lens. Leica M9
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sangjiny Senior Member 760 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:39 | #9 This one's from a different trip.. Brought 35L and 85L instead. Leica M9
LOG IN TO REPLY |
heycow Senior Member 771 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: Oakland, CA More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:40 | #10 Ditto on the fast lens. Even if you're just taking photos of eyeballs, having f/1.8 will save your tush. f/4 will give you nothing but blurry photos and flash will give you nothing but reflection. Hello, my name is BEN
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:41 | #11 Permanent bansangjiny wrote in post #11233510 Fast lens. I made the mistake of bringing a f/4 lens before with a flash... mistake. Lighting only coming from the tank isn't enough light for f/4. flash in very tight quarters didn't work too well either. 85mm is probably too long... I would suggest trying to rent a 35L.
One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:44 | #12 Permanent bansangjiny wrote in post #11233548 This one's from a different trip.. Brought 35L and 85L instead. 5DII 35L f/2 1/250s ISO 640 Only light source was from the tank. Because there were lots of people moving about, I didn't even pull out my 85L because I knew I couldn't frame the picture the way I wanted.
One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
heycow Senior Member 771 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: Oakland, CA More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:44 | #13 TooManyShots wrote in post #11233554 Ah...no. With a F1.4 lens you would need ISO 6400 to even get the shot. Sorry but this is not true. I've happily shot at a couple aquariums at f/2 and ISO 800 with my poor 40D. Just understand the lighting, understand the movement of the fish and there's no reason you should need f/1.4 and a crazy high ISO. Hello, my name is BEN
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sangjiny Senior Member 760 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:47 | #14 TooManyShots wrote in post #11233554 Ah...no. With a F1.4 lens you would need ISO 6400 to even get the shot. Mind you that's not even good enough to print. Of course, you better be shooting with either a 5dmarkII, 1dmarkIII, or 1dmark4 to get any usable ISO 6400 shots. To correctly use the flash is the way to go. 50mm is perfect. It gives you enough distance for you to use the flash. Any flash glare you can crop it out and it would not be on the subject. With a wider lens, you are forced to shoot too close to the glass, with a shorter distance between you and the subject. With the possibility to have the glare on the subject as well. This tends to produce even more harsher look with the flash. Look at these shots here: http://www.flickr.com …g/sets/72157624544799657/ These shots weren't the result of luck. Of course, you need a body and a lens that can AF fast and reliability. Please explain your reasoning behind needing ISO6400 at f/1.4 to even get the shot. Leica M9
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Karolina123 Member 160 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2010 Location: US, East Coast More info | Nov 05, 2010 21:47 | #15 in aquarium is always a lot of people and with 85mm it will be hard to shoot.... even if it's faster might become useless because of people which will glue their nose to the glasses.... I would recommend 24-105mm.... and higher ISO .... I was in aquarium with Canon 17-55mm f/2.8... and got a pretty good result.... some of photos was with f/4 and still that was enough to capture bright nice photos....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is bzguy 1680 guests, 178 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||