Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 05 Nov 2010 (Friday) 17:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5400RPM vs 7200RPM?

 
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Nov 06, 2010 16:46 |  #16

A great speed increase can be had by using RAID 0 or RAID 0+1


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 06, 2010 17:03 |  #17

Nightstalker wrote in post #11236833 (external link)
A great speed increase can be had by using RAID 0 or RAID 0+1

5400rpm drives are generally used in laptops, to reduce power, or by "green" drives in desktops. Fitting an extra drive in a laptop can be problematic.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Nov 06, 2010 17:23 |  #18

If you store a lot of data on your computer's hard disk, get the largest capacity first, then the fastest disk speed. A 1TB 5400RPM drive will be faster than a 320GB 7200RPM drive with 250GB of data on each. There's also a battery life/hard drive performance tradeoff you have to make.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Nov 06, 2010 18:51 |  #19

OP still hasn't said if he's on a Laptop or Desktop though. Pretty basic question.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edmyloo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
861 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Nov 07, 2010 03:09 |  #20

Nightstalker wrote in post #11237343 (external link)
OP still hasn't said if he's on a Laptop or Desktop though. Pretty basic question.

I'm on a laptop. Will a faster hard drive, greatly affect battery life or anything else?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 07, 2010 03:48 |  #21

Yep, battery life will go down a bit. If you get the Momentus XT battery life may actually be improved, there's less disk movement and more coming from the SSD which takes less power. A full SSD is the ultimate in low power disks.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattia
Senior Member
528 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2009
     
Nov 07, 2010 09:00 |  #22

I upgraded the 120GB stock hitachi 5400 rpm travelstar in my 3 year old macbook to a 320gb WD scorpio black 7200rpm drive about half a year ago. Battery consumption is about the same (no significant difference), performance is significantly better.

In no small part this is due to having a ton of free space on the disk; SSD's are faster because of direct access and lack of mechanical motion. The outer portion of the hard disk platter is 'faster' than the inner tracks as it travels under the reader head faster than the inner tracks do for the same rotational speed. Hard drives slow down significantly as they fill up, because you've used the faster, outer track already. Some advocate only using a proportion of a disk's capacity if you're after performance - in other words, get much more space than you really need.


5DII | 300D | 30D IR | 17-40L | 24-105L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS | 100-400L IS | 15 FE | 35L | 50/1.8 mk I | 135L | Sigmalux 50/1.4 | Sigma 105/F2.8 Macro | C/Y Planar 50/1.4 | C/Y Distagon 35/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Nov 07, 2010 09:08 |  #23

edmyloo wrote in post #11239256 (external link)
I'm on a laptop. Will a faster hard drive, greatly affect battery life or anything else?

Battery life will be unaffected for all intents and purposes.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nekrosoft13
Goldmember
Avatar
4,087 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Jun 2010
     
Nov 07, 2010 12:08 |  #24
bannedPermanent ban

DigitalSpecialist wrote in post #11232653 (external link)
If the 7200rpm isn't fast enough for you try SSDD. A 6.0gbs rate is incredible!

might be, but standards SSD(push about 260-300) don't reach that speed. maybe if you spend 1,000+ on PCI-E SSD.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Nov 07, 2010 12:14 |  #25
bannedPermanently

mattia wrote in post #11240052 (external link)
SSD's are faster because of direct access and lack of mechanical motion.

Same addressing scheme regardless of track and sector identification which promotes uniform read capabilities in terms of access time.

mattia wrote in post #11240052 (external link)
The outer portion of the hard disk platter is 'faster' than the inner tracks as it travels under the reader head faster than the inner tracks do for the same rotational speed. Hard drives slow down significantly as they fill up, because you've used the faster, outer track already. Some advocate only using a proportion of a disk's capacity if you're after performance - in other words, get much more space than you really need.

a major factor when a disk fills up is that file sectors are not organized for speed. There are utilities for correcting inefficiencies in file sector management which in turn promotes faster reads.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Nov 07, 2010 15:09 |  #26

Tony-S wrote in post #11240088 (external link)
Battery life will be unaffected for all intents and purposes.

I went from a 200GB Fujitsu something-or-other to a 320GB WD Scorpio Black in a 2008 Macbook Pro. Battery life went down by almost an hour, maybe around 40-50 min.


A new drive will be faster than an old one simply because the files won't be as fragmented. This plays a big part in the perception of speed when someone installs a new hard drive...it's the speed of a fresh, unfragmented file system they're seeing, not necessarily the speed of the drive.

Finally, the 6 Gb/s rating in some drives is the SATA III specification, not the speed of the drive itself. No current drive, hard or solid state, will saturate even a 3 Gb/s SATA II connection by itself.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Staszek
Goldmember
Avatar
3,606 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Nov 07, 2010 15:44 |  #27

edmyloo wrote in post #11239256 (external link)
I'm on a laptop. Will a faster hard drive, greatly affect battery life or anything else?

I notice no battery life decrease in my 2006 MBP when I went from the factory 80 GB 5400 rpm HDD to a Hitachi 500 GB 7200 rpm HDD.

Attached are my xBench scores (5400 rpm is on left, 7200 rpm is on right). You can see there's a decent performance jump between the two.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


SOSKIphoto (external link) | Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link)| Instagram (external link)
Shooting with big noisy cameras and a bag of primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
siddr20
Goldmember
Avatar
2,165 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sydney-Australia
     
Nov 07, 2010 23:03 |  #28

Picked up a western digital 1.5tb 7200rpm sataII drive for $90 bucks a week or two ago. Prices are deff dropping like crazy. You guys in the US will have it cheaper surely!!!
Also picked up a 1tb seagate usb2 drive for 80 bucks!!!!!!!!!!!! CRAZY prizes.


www.sidd-rishi.com.au (external link)http://www.sidd-rishi.com.au (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Nov 08, 2010 08:17 |  #29

toxic wrote in post #11241651 (external link)
I went from a 200GB Fujitsu something-or-other to a 320GB WD Scorpio Black in a 2008 Macbook Pro. Battery life went down by almost an hour, maybe around 40-50 min.

There is something wrong with your install. I've moved to 7200 rpm drives and they have not meaningful impact on battery life.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Nov 08, 2010 14:17 |  #30

Tony-S wrote in post #11245677 (external link)
There is something wrong with your install. I've moved to 7200 rpm drives and they have not meaningful impact on battery life.

How can something be "wrong" with an install? A hard drive works or it doesn't. There's nothing you can do to plug a hard drive in wrong and make it use more power.

What's more likely is that your computers weren't using power-efficient drives to begin with, and/or mine was, and the power consumption of a Scorpio Black is simply that much greater. Either that or you haven't been using high-performance hard drives like that Black is supposed to be...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,288 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
5400RPM vs 7200RPM?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1261 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.