Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 08 Nov 2010 (Monday) 16:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Gimp (photoshop) help - removing people

 
bone11
Member
103 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 08, 2010 16:06 |  #1

Took this shot in Las Vegas last week in front of Bally's. I'm sure I'm not the only one that's tried for this shot, but I could not get a sequence where there were no people on either walkway. I'd like to remove the people but I'm having a heck of a time.

At first I tried to cut and resize other like areas but that looked...bad. Then I tried cloning the left half then flipping the mirror image to the other side. I think that's where my lack of skills end. Here's the image:

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4108/5158957825_b64bf958dc_z.jpg

Any tips?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tristinGrind
Senior Member
Avatar
531 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
     
Nov 08, 2010 16:32 |  #2

I would clone the whole left half, flip it onto the right side...and then delete that layer in the areas that dont have people in it. Then you should have the very small group of people at the very end of the walkway on both sides and you should be able to clone those out using the background right around them.


-- Tristin
FB: +12/-0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bone11
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
103 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 08, 2010 18:59 as a reply to  @ tristinGrind's post |  #3

Ok, gave it another try. There were some areas in the back I couldn't replicate so I just made them very dark. I think in the future I need to take shots of there area if I think I'm going to have to edit it just so I have all the parts to reference in a single image. Here's the result:

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4011/5159996650_cdea574f97_z.jpg

How'd I do?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rioni
Goldmember
1,547 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2010
Location: 127.0.0.1
     
Nov 08, 2010 19:00 |  #4

I thought that was Vegas :) nice shot w/o the people




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wizcreations
Senior Member
Avatar
948 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Brevard County, FL, United States
     
Nov 08, 2010 19:44 |  #5

looks as though you got the shot with no one there. Excellent edit!


My Gear / Feedback
Flickr (external link) / Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Freshphoto-S
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
     
Nov 08, 2010 20:28 |  #6

Great edit...the only thing that bugs me (although very minor) is the tree. You can tell that it was a clone of the opposite side. Like I said, very very minor though. :)


Website (external link)
Blog (external link)
5DMKII gripped | 5D gripped | 40D | Rebel 350D | 70-200 2.8L IS | 24-70 2.8L | 16-35 2.8L | 50 1.4 USM | 85 1.8 USM | 100 2.8 Macro USM | 15 2.8 fisheye | 50 1.8 | 580EXII (x's 2) | 420 EX | ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 08, 2010 20:32 |  #7

Ditto as to what Fresh said about the tree. Why clone the entire left side? Just clone what you need to get rid of the people and leave the rest of the photo intact.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bone11
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
103 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 09, 2010 12:03 as a reply to  @ Nathan's post |  #8

Only trouble I had was that the actual background didn't look that much different than the flipped image, but I wasn't perfectly centered so the two halves didn't line up perfectly. Here is my latest attempt to retain the differences in the two sides so it's not so obvious a mirror image.

Moved some of the background red lights around, retained the original right side edge scenery, noise reduction and sharpening.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4008/5161381283_4174c5a73d_z.jpg

How about now?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ Dixon
Slit-scan project master
Avatar
1,867 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 276
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Ealing
     
Nov 09, 2010 12:18 |  #9

bone11 wrote in post #11253380 (external link)
Moved some of the background red lights around, retained the original right side edge scenery, noise reduction and sharpening.

How about now?


I think this is a great edit, much better without people and with some sign or assymetry. Nice photo.


flickr (external link) Editing OK (external link) www.slitcam.com (free slit-scan utility) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corkneyfonz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,477 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Nov 09, 2010 12:36 |  #10

Very interesting piece of architecture, whilst the after shot looks great, for the uninitiated to understand, having a human element helps as otherwise it just becomes a tad too abstract.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GorgeShooter
Goldmember
Avatar
1,422 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
     
Nov 09, 2010 12:39 |  #11

At first I was going to say remove the people. But once I saw the version without I like it better with the people....adds interest and perspective.


1DX | 5D MkII (gripped)
16-35 f/2.8L | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 70-200 f/4L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | 24 f/3.5L TS-E | 45 f/2.8 TS-E | 40 f/2.8 Pancake | 15 f/2.8 Fisheye | Tokina 100 f/2.8 Macro | Canon 1.4x TC | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Manfrotto 055CXPRO4 | Kirk BH-1
:: Smugmug :: (external link) | :: Photography BLOG :: (external link) | :: Workshops and Classes (external link) ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bone11
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
103 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 09, 2010 13:34 |  #12

I'm actually not sure which I like better. I know I wanted to have a shot w/o the people but they wouldn't cooperate. This is at a minimum practice for using Gimp since I'm a novice with it. Maybe if I captured the Bally's sign in the shot it would have been better, so it's clearly the entrance to the casino.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ Dixon
Slit-scan project master
Avatar
1,867 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 276
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Ealing
     
Nov 09, 2010 13:39 |  #13

I like the abstract nature of the shot and pinning it down to a real location - especially a casino would change it completely, not necessarily worse, but as it stands it could be so many things sci-fi to temple.


flickr (external link) Editing OK (external link) www.slitcam.com (free slit-scan utility) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 09, 2010 16:24 |  #14

If you took multiple exposures of the scene its fairly easy to remove the people in Photoshop using the Median Stack function. It works be eliminating the elements that are not common to every photo.

Here's an example where Jeff Schewe and Martin Evening demonstrate how they shot the Pritzker Pavillion (The Bean) in Chicago: http://photoshopnews.c​om …mate-workshop-book-shoot/ (external link)

Scroll approx. half way down the page.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woods
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2009
Location: Alabama
     
Nov 09, 2010 16:28 |  #15

great edit


Shawn
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,094 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Gimp (photoshop) help - removing people
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2484 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.