RD, yes, I think that is part of this equation that most miss ... all the liabilities that ensue with employment. And you never know when someone who you simply paid a few bucks to as an "assistant" may come back and demand to be treated as an employee and want worker's comp, etc., let alone demand Copyright to images in a shoot that you contracted for, provided all the equipment and production work, and all they did was show up, do what you asked, took your money, and left.
The law says,
So even if "If you show up to a job where somebody tells you what to do and when to do it, and for that you're rewarded with a paycheck," the client had better be ready to accept the photographer as an "employee" along with all the other tax and labor ramifications that "employee" implies.
For photographers who hire second shooters: Do you know your liability under workman's compensation laws if your second shooter gets injured on the job? If he's your "employee" for copyright purposes, are you willing to acccept him as an "employee" in all the other ways? Something to talk to a lawyer and a CPA about...and have hammered out in a contract.


