Trying different pp again. Any tips on improving these would be much appreciated.
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' |
Mill tower on the far left
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' |
Nov 09, 2010 13:44 | #1 Trying different pp again. Any tips on improving these would be much appreciated.
Mill tower on the far left
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2010 14:59 | #2 ack, looks like the sensor is still dirty :/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crashthenet44 Senior Member 514 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Rails of the Lehigh Valley Line and Trenton Sub More info | Nov 09, 2010 16:51 | #3 You were going for the purple sky look? If so, why? FLICKR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2010 16:58 | #4 I was not. I shot with a CPL which didn't work out too well for the first one. I decreased saturation which I think resolved this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monk3y Totally Saturated More info | Nov 09, 2010 18:10 | #5 yes the sensor is indeed extremely dirty, since you only shot this at f/11 and can see dust spots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheFramedLife Goldmember 1,054 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Saskatchewan, Canada More info | Nov 09, 2010 18:41 | #6 Permanent banawesome thing about dust spots, easy to clone out The Framed Life
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember 2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Nov 09, 2010 19:10 | #7 |
Nov 10, 2010 05:16 | #8 Thanks for the feedback all. I was thinking about sending the Camera to Canon for cleaning but may just try it myself. I had no idea the sensor was so dirty :/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MommaBird80 Senior Member 345 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Pittsburgh, PA More info | Nov 10, 2010 05:29 | #9 I like the PP on the first one, its different but it brings out the detail more. Too bad the top of the house was cropped off. But other wise, I like it! The waterfall is a pretty scene. What was your Exif for that if you don't mind me asking? Canon 7D - XSi 450D gripped/ EF 50mm f/1.4 / Tamron - AF 28-75/2.8 XR/ 85 1.8 USM/ 380EX flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fanto Member 73 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Nov 10, 2010 10:10 | #10 I like the first one. Very well done.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Capita Member 84 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Corner Brook, Newfoundland More info | Nov 10, 2010 10:45 | #11 I actually like them both. Excellent job
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Love the last one,great feel to it. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2010 12:09 | #13 Thanks for the comments everyone. I was going for a "fairytale" look while trying to retain a sharp image. Both were 6 shot HDR with exf:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheFramedLife Goldmember 1,054 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Saskatchewan, Canada More info | Nov 10, 2010 15:55 | #14 Permanent bancleaning a sensor is amazingly simple, don't wait for shipping it takes 2 minutes to do it yourself and it's fairly fool proof. The Framed Life
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2010 16:41 | #15 I think I'm going to just take it in to a local camera shop. They charge 40 for the cleaning and that seems to be about the going rate to purchase the materials to clean it. Unless someone has a better solution
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2788 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||