![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by ADVERTISEMENT |
Nov 10, 2010 14:20 | #1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fmismetti Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil More info | Nov 10, 2010 16:50 | #2 Looks nice but I would try without the round borders. It is a personal opinion, I never like that...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NYIrish Senior Member 608 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Johnson City NY More info | Nov 10, 2010 17:01 | #3 Agreed. I like the photo, if you were going for and old look make the border more jaged 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2010 17:24 | #4 Thanks for the comments. I was actually trying the border style for a blog. I don't like photos just sitting out in white space when there's text/content around. Perhaps I'll take away the black and just stick with the rounded edges.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
swetsastonic Senior Member 440 posts Joined Sep 2010 More info | Nov 12, 2010 09:18 | #5 I like this. the texture at the bottom is really nice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 12, 2010 09:29 | #6 PermanentlyA little crispy in the sharpening department. What tends to happen with sharpening is the percentage of tonal weight across the frame migrates towards the extremes of white and black fortifying edges but robbing the frame of the original tone center for the given element; i.e. the grass now looks white with black edges while the grass itself was likely closer to a zone 4 or 5 in original capture. Another example is the tone on the shadow side of the barn compared to the sunlit side. The sunlit side should have a similar gradation but 2 stops or so higher in zone (see A.Adams Tone System).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | You've got just enough shadow detail on the right side of the barn, which is good...its not totally lost in a sea of black (looks like you have enough room to pull out some more detail, though). But I also agree with jetcode about the sharpening...way too strong, to the point where I'm seeing artifacts on my monitor. Pull up the shadows and back off a bit on the sharpening and you'll be okay. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 15, 2010 08:37 | #8 This was a 3 shot bracket that i pulled into Photomatix before converting to B/W. I'm still experimenting with it, so that's possibly where the oversharpening came from. The original looks better imo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GorgeShooter Goldmember 1,422 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Oregon More info | Nov 15, 2010 10:52 | #9 I like the B&W version. Good detail and contrast. I too don't care for the rounded dark frame. Maybe a slight vignette would be better. I would suggest either cropping out part of the sky of turning in into a darker tone. 1DX | 5D MkII (gripped)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1376 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||