Does this lighting work? The source is overhead wall mounted rack of bulbs and mirrors. The original was shot on 4x5 10 years ago and I am coming back to this image to see if there is a better way to light this subject.
Thanks in advance.
jetcode Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 10, 2010 21:30 | #1 PermanentlyDoes this lighting work? The source is overhead wall mounted rack of bulbs and mirrors. The original was shot on 4x5 10 years ago and I am coming back to this image to see if there is a better way to light this subject.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chii Member 96 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Canada More info | Nov 11, 2010 17:21 | #2 I love the lighting, I think it is beautiful. Canon 50D - Canon Ef-S 17-85 - Canon 50/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember 2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Nov 11, 2010 20:08 | #3 Bewitching image and one which is certainly worthy of gallery space. This works so well on many levels and can be interpreted differently many times over. There is an however,that being the portions of hair which are jet black and without detail. These present a conflict within such a tranquil setting. Have they been deliberately enabled subconciously by the author, a mere hint perhaps that hidden behind this facade is something quite contrary.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 11, 2010 21:40 | #4 PermanentlyYeah the shadows are mucked for sure. This is a fairly old print before I acquired any real PP skills. I think I would have liked to have had a reflector in front of her to lift the light on her face a bit. I sort of went nuts when I saw this image on the ground glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poloman Cream of the Crop 5,442 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Southern Illinois More info | Nov 11, 2010 22:13 | #5 So you already know the answer. "All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 11, 2010 22:15 | #6 PermanentlyIt's more of a hunch than really knowing. I never took lighting. I was hoping someone with some portrait experience would come forward and make a few suggestions. I think the only thing that really saves this is the overhead light reflecting off the mirror.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2010 08:27 | #7 One advantage of being a professional photographer is that we (at least I) see things in a photograph that others simply do not see until it is pointed out. The # 1 main rule in portraiture is to light what you want the viewer to see, and don't light what you don't want the viewer to see. In the above image I'm guessing you wanted the viewer to see her face first, but unfortunately the first thing we see are her shoulders because the shoulders are the brightest thing in the entire image. That brings us to rule # 2, the eye is attracted first to either the brightest area or object in the image or the area or object with the most contrast between it and the background.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 12, 2010 09:18 | #8 PermanentlyWell stated Benji ... next question for this audience ... in terms of percentage where do you spend most of your time viewing this image:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poloman Cream of the Crop 5,442 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Southern Illinois More info | Nov 16, 2010 14:45 | #9 Shoulder light whether I want to or not. "All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 16, 2010 19:40 | #10 PermanentlyFortunately her shoulder is connected to her torso and her head. I wish I had more time and experience back then.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimMcrae Senior Member 938 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Edinburgh More info | Nov 17, 2010 07:09 | #11 Some interesting comments and sorry I can't add to them, other than to say I really like the image. Regarding your last question, I spend most time alternating between the two 'faces' and not the shoulder. 60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1335 guests, 181 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||