Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Performing Arts 
Thread started 11 Nov 2010 (Thursday) 09:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

When is it too dark to shoot the concert?

 
Gipetto
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 11, 2010 09:51 |  #1

Or is it ever?

I can't post the pics yet, but last night I shot a show where I had to boost the 7D to the full 12800 just to get 1/100 - 1/200 @ f/2.8 just so that I could get a decent shot. I was not allowed to use flash.

To add insult to injury the lead singer was black and LOVED to dance around. I had to wait 'till he was standing still to do anything which didn't produce very many choice moments. Pretty much the entire shoot was converted to black and white so that I could filter the dense colors to my advantage.

Yeah, woe is me and all that. ;)

I wondered a couple of times throughout the show if I was just wasting my time and I can't help but wonder if others here have walked away from a show because the lighting was just too bad.

I do have to say, though, that if I was still using my 20D I wouldn't have been able to get anything last night.


blog (external link) | gear | photos: zenfolio (external link), flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90c4
Goldmember
1,271 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
     
Nov 11, 2010 10:14 |  #2

That's when you put away the camera and enjoy the music.


www.facebook.com/stage​shooter (external link)http://www.facebook.co​m/stageshooter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Nov 11, 2010 10:20 |  #3

use a faster lens

eg. f/1.4




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Nov 11, 2010 10:26 |  #4

As Palladium says, use a faster lens and one preferably with IS. An f/1.4 will gain you about 2-stops over your current f/2.8 (or two shutter speeds).

The IS is not an instant fix and won't help at all if the subject is jumping around, but it will allow you to use slower shutter speeds when the subject is motionless or less energetic. Most IS lenses gain you 2-3 stops so that would be the equivalent of shooting at 1/50 second at least (starting from 1/200).

Also shoot RAW if you are not doing that already. Again, not a perfect fix but if your images are a bit underexposed having a RAW file will enable you to recover 1-2 stops before noise starts building up. And if all else fails, simply enjoy the show as 90c4. Not everything can be effectively photographed with the tools at hand - that's when it's time to relax and simply "see" what's going on.:D - Stu


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
narlus
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,671 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Andover, MA
     
Nov 11, 2010 16:21 |  #5

this shot is at least 4.5 stops of light less than what you described:

f/1.4
1/40th
ISO 25600

IMAGE: http://narlus.zenfolio.com/img/s5/v4/p969649969-5.jpg

www.tinnitus-photography.com (external link)
Facebook link (external link)

gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gipetto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 12, 2010 09:04 |  #6

sapearl wrote in post #11265427 (external link)
As Palladium says, use a faster lens and one preferably with IS. An f/1.4 will gain you about 2-stops over your current f/2.8 (or two shutter speeds).

The IS is not an instant fix and won't help at all if the subject is jumping around, but it will allow you to use slower shutter speeds when the subject is motionless or less energetic. Most IS lenses gain you 2-3 stops so that would be the equivalent of shooting at 1/50 second at least (starting from 1/200).

Also shoot RAW if you are not doing that already. Again, not a perfect fix but if your images are a bit underexposed having a RAW file will enable you to recover 1-2 stops before noise starts building up. And if all else fails, simply enjoy the show as 90c4. Not everything can be effectively photographed with the tools at hand - that's when it's time to relax and simply "see" what's going on.:D - Stu

Yeah, I'm all about RAW. Unfortunately my fastest prime is my nifty fifty and he's got a few issues of his own and is not suitable for concert photography (though if you have enough time he is very sharp).

And, yeah, IS would give me more hand holding at lower speeds but wouldn't really give much of an advantage to moving subjects at those speeds. You still end up with the more boring static shots (which, yeah, depending upon the artist you may only get those anyway). I tend to gravitate towards more energetic bands so not being able to get 1/125 typically means not getting much usable.

Like you and 90c4 said. Pack it up and order a beer ;)

narlus wrote in post #11267509 (external link)
this shot is at least 4.5 stops of light less than what you described:

f/1.4
1/40th
ISO 25600

Yeah, that would be about when I'd pack it in. Unless it was Patrick Stewart & Keanu Reeves playing a Black Sabbath revival set. A guy can dream, right? ;)

Oh, and, I like yer stuff.


blog (external link) | gear | photos: zenfolio (external link), flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThomasOwenM
Senior Member
Avatar
959 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
     
Nov 20, 2010 20:37 as a reply to  @ Gipetto's post |  #7

Bummer that you were not allowed to use flash. I've been wanting to invest in the new ETTL Pocket Wizards so that I can use off-camera flash in light-starved situations like that. I know someone who does that and his results are impressive. An off-camera flash with gels can look a lot like stage lighting.


===============
1D Mark III, Canon 50L f/1.2, Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 lens, Canon 85 mm f/1.8, 430 EX flash, ST-E2 Transmitter, Quantaray QSX 9500 tripod, Manfrotto monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gipetto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 20, 2010 22:05 |  #8

That's not a bad idea. I've just gotten started here doing concerts again so maybe once I get to know some of the venue folks a bit better I can try requesting that.

Thanks for the idea!


blog (external link) | gear | photos: zenfolio (external link), flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jparniawski
Junior Member
Avatar
21 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Nov 20, 2010 22:32 |  #9

Most concert shots suffer from use of flash, and often flash is not allowed as it distracts the artist(s). I usually shoot shows with a 70-200 2.8 L and a 24 1.4 L...See some of my shooting at www.viewpointglobal.co​m (external link) in the concerts section. If you find the settings right for you to shoot it's never dark enough...except when all the lights are off :)


Still learning but starting to get the hang of things...
My website (external link) | My Gear (external link) | My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThomasOwenM
Senior Member
Avatar
959 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
     
Nov 20, 2010 22:39 |  #10

Gipetto wrote in post #11319599 (external link)
That's not a bad idea. I've just gotten started here doing concerts again so maybe once I get to know some of the venue folks a bit better I can try requesting that.

Thanks for the idea!

You're welcome. Another thing you can do is get good lighting via diplomatic skills. You befriend the lighting technician and request that he or she crank up the lights. You must never come across as a self-important photographer telling the lighting person how to do their job. Instead, it's like asking for a favor and being grateful. I usually say something like, "You're a photographer's best friend if you can give me some great lighting." It also helps if the performer has asked you to be there and is in on the lighting request. Then if they comply, you always always thank them. Here's a shot I was able to do at ISO 1600 with my 20D. It's at the Waiting Room in Omaha, NE that has sometimes had such bad lighting that I've on other times resorted to deliberately underexposing and readjusting in Photoshop. 1600 is a huge luxury. Here's the shot:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Btw, it's with the 85 f/1.8.

Here's another shot that benefited from negotiation with the light guy. It's of Michelle Huerd of Born In Winter (a Denver-based band) when they were visiting Lincoln, NE. When the opening band played, the lighting was so bad, the only way I could get a shot was to underexpose or flash. During the break, I talked w/ the light guy and he gladly cranked it up for me. I still used 3200, but I was able to get the exposure perfectly and use a very fast shutter speed. I'd need to look, but I think the speed was at about 1/800. The result:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Btw, I see you're in Denver. Do you ever shoot for RockOnColorado.com? I used to shoot for them when I lived in Denver. I still do occasionally if the band is from Colorado or if I go there to visit.

===============
1D Mark III, Canon 50L f/1.2, Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 lens, Canon 85 mm f/1.8, 430 EX flash, ST-E2 Transmitter, Quantaray QSX 9500 tripod, Manfrotto monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThomasOwenM
Senior Member
Avatar
959 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
     
Nov 20, 2010 22:44 |  #11

jparniawski wrote in post #11319684 (external link)
Most concert shots suffer from use of flash, and often flash is not allowed as it distracts the artist(s). I usually shoot shows with a 70-200 2.8 L and a 24 1.4 L...See some of my shooting at www.viewpointglobal.co​m (external link) in the concerts section. If you find the settings right for you to shoot it's never dark enough...except when all the lights are off :)

Depends on the venue. Most concert halls don't allow it, but bars and other small venues usually do. Pop-up flash almost always looks like garbage. External hot-shoe flash is better, and off-camera flash done right works best. And, btw, the negotiating with the light guy technique I talked about in my previous post also works best in small venues. At a big event, they would probably laugh at you. Forget about it at Madison Square Garden, but they would probably have great lighting anyway.


===============
1D Mark III, Canon 50L f/1.2, Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 lens, Canon 85 mm f/1.8, 430 EX flash, ST-E2 Transmitter, Quantaray QSX 9500 tripod, Manfrotto monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gipetto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 21, 2010 15:00 |  #12

Befriending the lighting guy is a good option too. Thanks for the idea!


blog (external link) | gear | photos: zenfolio (external link), flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NotASpeckOfCereal
Senior Member
Avatar
297 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Staly Vegas, UK
     
Jan 10, 2011 15:45 |  #13

narlus wrote in post #11267509 (external link)
this shot is at least 4.5 stops of light less than what you described:

f/1.4
1/40th
ISO 25600

QUOTED IMAGE

great shot - who is that? what lens?


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
narlus
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,671 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Andover, MA
     
Jan 11, 2011 06:33 |  #14

thanks!

that's the guitar player from a band called Soundpool, based out of NYC. shot w/ the canon 35 f/1.4


www.tinnitus-photography.com (external link)
Facebook link (external link)

gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,214 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
When is it too dark to shoot the concert?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Performing Arts 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1471 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.