Has anyone ever sold digital files only no prints?
Had a email today of the father of a freshman quaterback that wanted to know if I would sell digital copy of what is posted.
John
JohnPAtl Member 56 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Nov 12, 2010 12:30 | #1 Has anyone ever sold digital files only no prints? 50D w/Grip, 18-135,70-200 f/2.8L, 50 /1.4, 85 /1.8 Speedlight 580EXII,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tracknut Goldmember 1,740 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Folsom, California More info | Nov 12, 2010 12:34 | #2 Yes, people sell digital files all the time. Or do you mean exclusively, they don't have prints for sale but only digital files? Dunno on that one. Performance/sport dog photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2010 12:35 | #3 He just wants to buy the digital files of some of son's game photos.. 50D w/Grip, 18-135,70-200 f/2.8L, 50 /1.4, 85 /1.8 Speedlight 580EXII,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2010 13:04 | #4 I offer both, digital and print.... as well as mouse pads, t-shirts, magazine covers, etc. Why not? 5DmkII, 5DmkIII, 5DS R, 15mm, 16-35 f/2.8 II L, 100 Macro f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, 580EX II, 580EX, 550EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeteA Member 159 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Hertfordshire, UK More info | Nov 12, 2010 13:15 | #5 I only sell digital's. Never needed to sell prints etc .... blames the idealistic society we live in, a society that demands perfection however, the concept of perfection is fundamentally flawed. Once perfection is reached it is no longer perfect, since a new standard is created based on an "improved vision" of the original perfection. This creates a infinite cycle which inevitably leaves to disappointment.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2010 13:17 | #6 thanks, 50D w/Grip, 18-135,70-200 f/2.8L, 50 /1.4, 85 /1.8 Speedlight 580EXII,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shockey Goldmember 1,187 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Boise Idaho More info | Nov 12, 2010 13:18 | #7 All the time, 99% of all photo viewing/displaying is done on the computer screen. ___________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info | Nov 12, 2010 13:46 | #8 I sell digital files that are sized for a high quality 8x10/8x12 print... For personal use they are $18 each, which is a couple dollars less than I charge for a print that size, but more expensive than smaller prints I offer. I will give a little discount if they bought a large number of digitial files. Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tracknut Goldmember 1,740 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Folsom, California More info | Nov 12, 2010 13:55 | #9 amfoto1 wrote in post #11272676 These are download prices. If I burn and supply a disk there will usually be a slight additional charge. Including sales tax, correct? It's a legit question, not a jab. My understanding, and what I do, here in CA is that emailed jpeg files do not require sales tax, whereas a CD with jpegs on it does require sales tax. That's usually enough to convince my customers to accept them over email. Performance/sport dog photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2010 14:02 | #10 amfoto1 wrote in post #11272676 I sell digital files that are sized for a high quality 8x10/8x12 print... For personal use they are $18 each, which is a couple dollars less than I charge for a print that size, but more expensive than smaller prints I offer. I will give a little discount if they bought a large number of digitial files. I make certain to imbed "personal use only, non transferable" licensing info in the EXIF. Editorial use licensing is available too, starting at $75 and going up from there. Commercial use I don't quote until I know more details about the exact usage. These are download prices. If I burn and supply a disk there will usually be a slight additional charge. I don't object to selling digital files... But it's just one of over 100 different products that customers can purchase from me. I do get upset that some people give digital files away at ridiculously low prices. I have every bit as much work into a digital file as I do a print, so there is no reason I can see that it should be all that much cheaper than a standard print. (I know of an event photographer who sells a CD of up to 100 images for $10!) What about the market where all kids want is digital files to throw an image on facebook, or on their phone, etc.? I see a market where you offer a small digital file, say 500 pixels on the long side, that is for web use only and will not print well. If you set it up so they know what they are buying, a file not for printing, but for web/PDA viewing, then I see no problem selling these for cheap. I offer these small files at $2 a piece (recent offer) and it has done alright in sales so far. I figured people (kids) were 'stealing' them anyways in ways that degrades the quality (cell phone pic of the monitor with my image up) and still contains my watermark. So why not offer a cheap alternative that they can buy them and use them for what they want them for, which is to put up on facebook, etc. 5DmkII, 5DmkIII, 5DS R, 15mm, 16-35 f/2.8 II L, 100 Macro f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, 580EX II, 580EX, 550EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeR Goldmember 4,319 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2006 Location: 06478, CT More info | Nov 13, 2010 08:26 | #11 I priced my digial files the same as my 5x7 prints. It seems strange but I sell more prints than files. If I get a call from a kid (1 or 2 a season), I will give them a cropped file for facebook. To cut down (you'll never totaly prevent it) on stealing, I have darkened up my © and may resort to placing it twice on each image on line. Right now I just have it in the center. Mike R
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Nov 13, 2010 09:46 | #12 Mike R wrote in post #11276522 To cut down (you'll never totaly prevent it) on stealing, I have darkened up my © and may resort to placing it twice on each image on line. Right now I just have it in the center. I have seen people use watermarked photos as their profile photo on facebook with the watermark visible.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeR Goldmember 4,319 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2006 Location: 06478, CT More info | Nov 13, 2010 11:10 | #13 HappySnapper90 wrote in post #11276835 I have seen people use watermarked photos as their profile photo on facebook with the watermark visible. I have to. When I fist discovered it, I offered the small file at no charge (The kids parents spent a lot on prints) The kid refused and said it was OK with my watermark. I think the kids like people to notice that they "stole" it. When an on line newspaper used one of my images, with my watermark barley visible. I took action. Turned out it was a reporter who got the image from a girl who stole it and provided it to him, who then submitted it with his story on the girl. He paid me for his laspe in judgement. Mike R
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | What about the market where all kids want is digital files to throw an image on facebook, or on their phone, etc.? I see a market where you offer a small digital file, say 500 pixels on the long side, that is for web use only and will not print well. If you set it up so they know what they are buying, a file not for printing, but for web/PDA viewing, then I see no problem selling these for cheap. I offer these small files at $2 a piece (recent offer) and it has done alright in sales so far. That's not a "market," not in the sense of providing a profit (I just checked the topic header; it still says "The Business of Photography"). TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1581 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||