Demoed one yesterday including some with a 2x TC attached and it was truly excellent at all FL's.
I Shouldn't of done that!!
yagimax Goldmember More info | Demoed one yesterday including some with a 2x TC attached and it was truly excellent at all FL's. Sony A7RII, FE16-35, FE35 2.8, FE90 macro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SoaringUSAEagle Daddy Of The Crop 10,814 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cheyenne, WY More info | Nov 12, 2010 16:13 | #17 I cant be happier with mine. Dead on at any aperture, and any FL. Superb. 5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gomboman Senior Member 723 posts Likes: 54 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Murrieta, CA More info | I would like to see some comparison images from both lenses from someone who upgraded from the Mark I to the Mark II. 1D Mark III | 1D Mark IIN | 5D | 17-40L | 24-70L | 70-200L II | 1.4 TC II| 550EX | And some other stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SavasK Goldmember 1,425 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Nov 12, 2010 21:01 | #19 Gomboman wrote in post #11274785 I would like to see some comparison images from both lenses from someone who upgraded from the Mark I to the Mark II. I might get the chance to do just that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 12, 2010 21:24 | #20 Gomboman wrote in post #11274785 I would like to see some comparison images from both lenses from someone who upgraded from the Mark I to the Mark II. I'm a Mark I owner and have the fever to upgrade. I hate this feeling...... You'll feel a lot better just buying it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Nov 12, 2010 21:24 | #21 Gomboman wrote in post #11274785 I would like to see some comparison images from both lenses from someone who upgraded from the Mark I to the Mark II. I'm a Mark I owner and have the fever to upgrade. I hate this feeling...... There are bunch of threads. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bkdc Senior Member 888 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2007 Location: NoVA More info | Nov 12, 2010 21:25 | #22 Absolutely awesome. I have no complaints. Sharp at all focal lengths. I sent mine in for concerns of decentering as one corner seemed to be slightly less sharp. But after it came back calibrated, it was pure magic. RF 24-70 f/4L IS | RF 24-70 f/2.8L IS | RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS | RF 50L | RF 85L | 600EX-RT x 3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VinnieJ Senior Member 642 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: USA More info | Nov 12, 2010 21:36 | #23 I've never noticed a difference in sharpness throughout the focal lengths. I had the 24-70 for a short time and that was a bit of a pain with focusing. I traded it in for the Mark II and couldn't be happier. Now I just need something better in the 24-70 range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 12, 2010 21:39 | #24 VinnieJ wrote in post #11274973 I've never noticed a difference in sharpness throughout the focal lengths. I had the 24-70 for a short time and that was a bit of a pain with focusing. I traded it in for the Mark II and couldn't be happier. Now I just need something better in the 24-70 range. A 24-70 MK II with IS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VinnieJ Senior Member 642 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: USA More info | Nov 12, 2010 21:41 | #25 No doubt. Hopefully soon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackzzz Senior Member 285 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2008 Location: SE Michigan More info | Nov 13, 2010 00:53 | #26 I've heard all the raves about this lens on a 7D but how does it perform on a 40D and 50D...just as well? Canon 7D * Canon 7D Mark II * Canon 50D * Canon 40D * Canon 20D * Canon S95 * EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM * EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II USM * EF 100-400L f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 13, 2010 00:55 | #27 blackzzz wrote in post #11275675 I've heard all the raves about this lens on a 7D but how does it perform on a 40D and 50D...just as well? This lens will perform well on any sensor.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlintz Senior Member 614 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Midwest More info | My copy is so sharp my eyes bleed when I look at it....not the pictures, the actual lens. Yeah, it's that badass. Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
denoir Goldmember 1,152 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Stockholm, Sweden More info | Nov 13, 2010 04:07 | #29 Sadly unused. For the past six months I've basically completely gone over to using prime lenses and the 70-200/II has not gotten much exercise. It's too bad as it's a fantastic lens. I got a load of great pictures with it during a safari in South Africa in May and I would really like to have another such opportunity to put it to good use. Luka C.D| My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndersÖstberg Goldmember 3,395 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Sweden More info | Nov 13, 2010 04:09 | #30 Superb lens, well worth the upgrade if you're often shooting at f/2.8 Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1496 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||