Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 12 Nov 2010 (Friday) 12:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

how's your copy of the 70-200mm Mark II

 
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Nov 13, 2010 12:10 |  #31

its just a great tool however any 70-200mk1 owner should not envy it.

My old mk1 was very sharp at f/2.8 but the mk2 seems to exhibit almost like a sharpness/clarity/cont​rast "hit" that I would do in post.

This white lens does seem to be like a "zoom" prime lens. One thing is I've seemed to be able to land 1/25 SS photos with the new lens.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rx7speed
Goldmember
1,204 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Nov 13, 2010 12:38 |  #32

mine is a great lens as long as it hits focus but it seems to have issues with that at the moment. Just waiting for some money so I can send the bugger into canon and have them fix the problem with the lens.
I did notice though it seems that when it does hit focus the 200mm range seems a tad sharper then the 70mm range though either way both are sharp when in focus.

love the fact that I stop down for more DOF anymore and I don't stop down to get a sharp image. it's great comming from the 55-250 :-)


digital: 7d 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, 17-55 2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
5,175 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Jun 2005
Location: san jose
     
Nov 13, 2010 12:49 |  #33

Did anyone have to micro adjust theirs? I found that at +2 it's a tad sharper on the 1DMKIII.

Also how's low light focusing for you? I found it hunted quite a bit even when I was shooting 1/800 f2.8. But when it locked, it was sharp.


Sonny
website (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Nov 13, 2010 14:48 |  #34

4x4rock wrote in post #11277577 (external link)
Did anyone have to micro adjust theirs? I found that at +2 it's a tad sharper on the 1DMKIII.

Also how's low light focusing for you? I found it hunted quite a bit even when I was shooting 1/800 f2.8. But when it locked, it was sharp.

I have +1 on my 1d3. Everyone may need to do a minor tweek.

Not enough time yet with this lens to see how the low light operation of this lens.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Nov 13, 2010 14:56 as a reply to  @ AlanU's post |  #35

Now you guys telling me that it would need MA? I don't need newer body coming with it in the same pkg.:D


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Nov 13, 2010 15:04 |  #36

bobbyz wrote in post #11278115 (external link)
Now you guys telling me that it would need MA? I don't need newer body coming with it in the same pkg.:D

No simply sift through a bunch copies :)


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Savas ­ K
Goldmember
1,425 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Nov 13, 2010 15:51 |  #37

Savas K wrote in post #11274788 (external link)
I might get the chance to do just that.

Okay, I got my chance to compare the my MK1 with an MKII today. Here goes.

All are out of DPP with the same settings and no further work was done on them. All are shot handheld wide open; images are either 70mm or 200mm. For each set of images, the top one is MK1 and the one below is MKII. I am kind'a not seeing a major difference.


MK1

IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v12/p581355445-4.jpg

MK2
IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s10/v16/p590932538-4.jpg

MK1
IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v11/p611248825-4.jpg

MK2
IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s9/v15/p622589589-4.jpg

MK1
IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s10/v18/p683325084-4.jpg

MK2
IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s10/v18/p633007952-4.jpg

MK1
IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s9/v15/p640060535-4.jpg

MK2
IMAGE: http://SavasK.zenfolio.com/img/s9/v15/p661465492-4.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Nov 13, 2010 15:58 |  #38

Savas take a photo of a human subject. You should see a difference.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timeasterday
Senior Member
Avatar
960 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Anderson, SC
     
Nov 13, 2010 16:49 |  #39

4x4rock wrote in post #11277577 (external link)
Did anyone have to micro adjust theirs? I found that at +2 it's a tad sharper on the 1DMKIII.

Also how's low light focusing for you? I found it hunted quite a bit even when I was shooting 1/800 f2.8. But when it locked, it was sharp.

I followed Chuck Westfall's technique but took many more shots at various MA settings. From -5 to +5 I cannot see any difference - it is tack sharp all the way. It starts getting softer if I go more than 5 either way. So I ended up leaving my MA setting at zero.


7DMKII, 5DMKII, Canon 17-40L, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Canon 70-200mmL f/2.8 II, Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Zeiss ZE 50mm Makro Planar, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, Kenko Pro 300 DG 1.4x TC, Canon 2X III TC, 580EX II x2, YN560, RF603's
My Smugmug (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Nov 13, 2010 17:31 |  #40

Sharper than I thought was reasonable on a zoom! First time on a zoom lens I can look at photos from my 7D at 100% crop and feel like they are very sharp. Which is crazy given the amazing pixel density of the 7D's sensor.


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Savas ­ K
Goldmember
1,425 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Nov 14, 2010 08:21 |  #41

AlanU wrote in post #11278370 (external link)
Savas take a photo of a human subject. You should see a difference.

I gave it a shot. Here are the crops. Which one is which?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED



IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED



IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED



IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anders ­ Östberg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,395 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
     
Nov 14, 2010 09:01 |  #42

Hard to say - instead of your pictures I see a padlock and the text "Content Protected by Owner" ...


Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ahendarman
Senior Member
Avatar
851 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 14, 2010 09:04 |  #43

Is it even possible to get a non-sharp copy of this lens?
Mine is outstanding across all FL.


Gear | Smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarks
Senior Member
822 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 14, 2010 09:20 |  #44

My 70-200L2 is tack sharp in all FL




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90c4
Goldmember
1,271 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
     
Nov 14, 2010 09:30 |  #45

Mine couldn't be sharper. I thought my original 70-200 was sharp until I got this. The difference is dramatic - two very different lenses. The contrast is way superior to the Mk I and I can handhold to almost half a second at 200mm - what more could one ask for?


www.facebook.com/stage​shooter (external link)http://www.facebook.co​m/stageshooter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,416 views & 0 likes for this thread, 39 members have posted to it.
how's your copy of the 70-200mm Mark II
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1496 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.