I've just seen the new sigma 17-50 and so far I read lots of great comments on it.
Now as tokina cheaper than sigma, is there any reasonable factor to choose sigma over tokina and pay more 200 bucks ?
I know sigma has HSM and OS. However tokina's AF system is silent and fast adequately, at least as far as I've read. Moreover OS system is not really necessary for a lens with constant f2.8 aperture value. Okay it maybe useful but not a must.
While the case like that what would your choice be.
Really need some logical and convincing reasons to make my final decision.
By the way, I was considering the canon 15-85. Whereas it's a little out of the comparison due to its aperture value and range. However if you have experience with this lens please feel free to write your opinions as it's in the comparison as a part.
Thanks in advance

