why dont you try at ISO 100, use tripod and remote release.. and add a bit sharpening..
mansalim Goldmember 1,105 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: 16801 More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:00 | #16 why dont you try at ISO 100, use tripod and remote release.. and add a bit sharpening..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WildDingo THREAD STARTER Junior Member 20 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Broome Western Australia More info | oh and I have tried the 2x converter... but didnt think much of the results so it now resides comfortably in its nice leather pouch in the camera case!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WildDingo THREAD STARTER Junior Member 20 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Broome Western Australia More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:09 | #18 mansalim wrote in post #11311196 why dont you try at ISO 100, use tripod and remote release.. and add a bit sharpening.. 100? I hadnt thought to go lower!! Good idea I will give it a whirl thanks!! I already use a tripod and the remote release... you REALLY DONT want to see the ones that I take when I DONT use them!!! mmmm reminds me I MUST upgrade my specs!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mansalim Goldmember 1,105 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: 16801 More info | my friend, you need speed for whales.. Long slow lens wont cut it..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WildDingo THREAD STARTER Junior Member 20 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Broome Western Australia More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:17 | #20 mansalim wrote in post #11311209 my friend, you need speed for whales.. Long slow lens wont cut it.. and since they swim pretty close to the boat, you rarely need 650mm f8.. my 70-200 f2.8 worked fine.. even my 28-135 worked fine You used the magic word mate... "boat"... Im shore bound!!! No boat... and the cost of getting onto a whale watching boat is preclusive to me...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mansalim Goldmember 1,105 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: 16801 More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:18 | #21 i use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.. im a PC guy..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mansalim Goldmember 1,105 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: 16801 More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:20 | #22 Wild Dingo wrote in post #11311221 You used the magic word mate... "boat"... Im shore bound!!! No boat... and the cost of getting onto a whale watching boat is preclusive to me... mmmm speed is the key?... okay so given the above can you suggest an alternative method of getting shots from distance of them? how long are we talking here? if your whale swims nearer to the beach, it is possible to use your lens and set the shutter speed accordingly.. and you have to manually focus too.. i never shot a whale from shore, so i cant be more helpful
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WildDingo THREAD STARTER Junior Member 20 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Broome Western Australia More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:21 | #23 mansalim wrote in post #11311222 i use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.. im a PC guy.. since moon move slowly (time-wise), you can set your ISO to the lowest setting and adjust your shutter speed for exposure. Say 4 seconds.. and skip that teleconverter.. it will degrade the image quality. i hope this helps Absolutely!! Thanks... I dont know the program so that bit didnt help
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WildDingo THREAD STARTER Junior Member 20 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Broome Western Australia More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:25 | #24 mansalim wrote in post #11311228 how long are we talking here? if your whale swims nearer to the beach, it is possible to use your lens and set the shutter speed accordingly.. and you have to manually focus too.. i never shot a whale from shore, so i cant be more helpful How long?... mmm not sure if you mean the time the whale breaches or the time they are out of the water as a whole? or the time it takes for me to get my eye focused then the lens then the camera? which is a whole other matter! (sorry Im making light here!)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mansalim Goldmember 1,105 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: 16801 More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:30 | #25 Wild Dingo wrote in post #11311236 How long?... mmm not sure if you mean the time the whale breaches or the time they are out of the water as a whole? or the time it takes for me to get my eye focused then the lens then the camera? which is a whole other matter! (sorry Im making light here!) I will give that a while with the big one hopefully next weekend... the other lens I have just dont reach far enough to see them clearly no matter what I tried hence buying this new one... it reaches!... just have to get a whale to cooperate thats all... but if I line it up and set the shutter speed to the fastest possible and manually focus (which with this lens is a given) that should hopefully achieve something like what Im trying to achieve? oh and mate? Seriously THANKS!!! can i come to your place? seriosly i would like to see some whale without getting on the boat..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WildDingo THREAD STARTER Junior Member 20 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Broome Western Australia More info | Nov 19, 2010 04:35 | #26 mansalim wrote in post #11311250 can i come to your place? seriosly i would like to see some whale without getting on the boat.. You dont have to set the shutter to the fastest possible.. just fast enought to "capture" the whale in action.. and use continuous shooting.. just fire away.. and pick your best one.. you may get lucky..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phbk Member 64 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: Gold Coast, Australia More info | Nov 19, 2010 05:53 | #27 Wild Dingo wrote in post #11311205 How does one "add a bit of sharpening"? in iphoto? apeture? Im not understanding you Im sorry I'm not a Mac user, so probably not much help, but you need to find where iPhoto is storing your photos. Once you know where the photos are you should be able to use Aperture to open them, and then you can sharpen them. Google "Aperture sharpening tutorial" or try this ... Phil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 19, 2010 06:05 | #28 You might have a little fun with that lens, but I don't think you will ever really enjoy the images as being sharp. In the future, when you are ready to put a little money forward, if you take a Sigma 150-500 OS and add a 1.4x or even a 2x, you will probably enjoy the images better. This was from the Sigma 50-500 OS with a 2x converter (making it 1000mm) on the 7D, handheld btw. You get OS to help with the long shots using the TCs, but have to manually focus.
Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm" More info | Nov 19, 2010 06:08 | #29 Here is the OP's photo of the moon without and with sharpening: sharpened Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mundty Goldmember 1,125 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Bucks County, PA More info | Nov 19, 2010 07:35 | #30 Woodworker wrote in post #11280871 An awesome focal length but not particularly practical and I wonder what you'll use the lens for in the long-term. David Peeping Tom is my guess. www.mikemundt.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1749 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||