I'm sure the thought is to build up clientele, but it's the wrong clientele for a boutique business that provides a custom, luxury service...and like or not, that's what a portrait photographer running his own studio is.
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | If you start charging $79 and people tell their friends about their session they are also going to tell their friends they paid $79 for it, then when you bump to price to $150 people are going to be put out. The only way to make any money with rock bottom prices is with super high volume, but the admin that going along with high volume is going to make it impossible for one person to shoot and do the admin, then once you've got staff on your books you're even further away from making a profit. I'm sure the thought is to build up clientele, but it's the wrong clientele for a boutique business that provides a custom, luxury service...and like or not, that's what a portrait photographer running his own studio is. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TGrundvig Goldmember 2,876 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Nov 15, 2010 08:37 | #17 tkbslc wrote in post #11284880 I didn't claim to have access to their books, but $80 an hour at full booking doesn't seem like it would go very far once you have to cover rent, props, camera gear, advertising, insurance, taxes, and then still have money to take home. Whats to say he doesn't own the equipment and the space? Or, maybe he owns the equipment and has a trade out for the space....? 1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Nov 15, 2010 08:43 | #18 There's money in this method if you're a straight to CD shooter but that leaves a lot on the table. A recent senior of mine added more than his fee in extra prints for just three images...and I even heavily discount reprints (leaving dough on the table too). Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
well if he does 6 a day, 5 days a week its $2,370 a week..thats $123,240 a year before taxes if they work every week (52 weeks in a year)...and he still has weekends off to do weddings if he/she chooses...maybe its not sustainable...or maybe it is..yep its a lot of work..but it averages out to $59/hr for a 40 hour work week..and since its done in studio (and if they know what they are doing) the pp'ing should be almost non-exsistent..just saying EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 15, 2010 08:52 | #20 Or maybe the guy recently came into some money, has everything paid off... Home, car, equipt etc. and just wants to get people in the door to get word of mouth advertizing for bigger stuff. ---------------Camera, Lens, Flash stuff.. but still wanting more
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | Nov 15, 2010 08:52 | #21 cdifoto wrote in post #11287008 There's money in this method if you're a straight to CD shooter but that leaves a lot on the table. A recent senior of mine added more than his fee in extra prints for just three images...and I even heavily discount reprints (leaving dough on the table too). I don't see why anyone would go the volume route. That's too much hustle, IMHO. It's not just too much hustle, it just isn't sustainable for that kind of business. Heck, not even Walmart can always keep such a photographic business running profitably. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | Nov 15, 2010 08:57 | #22 Gaarryy wrote in post #11287048 Or maybe the guy recently came into some money, has everything paid off... Home, car, equipt etc. and just wants to get people in the door to get word of mouth advertizing for bigger stuff. If that's the case, then as cdifoto mentioned in another thread, why is he hustling after Walmart traffic when he would have the financial leeway to court the the Rolex traffic? TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Nov 15, 2010 09:05 | #23 RDKirk wrote in post #11287049 It's not just too much hustle, it just isn't sustainable for that kind of business. Heck, not even Walmart can always keep such a photographic business running profitably. I think it ultimately depends where you are and if the volume is consistent. Most of the time it's not, so you're right. But if by some miracle you're in an area where cost of living is lower and the doors are continuously rotating, you could do fine. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tjames Senior Member 261 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Metro Detroit More info | You also have to take into account that just because you need XX amount of money to live doesn't mean the next guy does as well. I have a very good friend that owns a tattoo shop and I would fall out of my chair if he were to tell me he made more than 30k a year, in fact that's probably the high end.. he is absolutely fine with it, he doesn't live beyond his means, is happy with simple things, never complains, and always seems to have money to buy a round or three when we go out to the bar.. who's to say this guy isn't the same? Gear List: Kodak Funsaver MAX Cameras, Epson Scanner, MS Paint & some Crayons
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2461 guests, 100 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||