Photon Phil wrote in post #11288601
Thanks for posting, good to see their health.
---------------
An aside...(not trolling) just commenting on what I really see in a real picture in the story. Look at the picture, really look at it.
A guy testing out a camera with fine calibration equiptment...the ceiling! He's using the ceiling to check something, ...anything ...out?! All bare hands, even with a several $k lens. Lesson learned, send it in really busted or not at all because you're going to get it back with minumal actual expertise (paper diploma on guy's shelf). Refurb dependability??
How can I make this generalization? I can't. BUT there is a picture of what was really happening that day. Can't ignore that.
Uh, dood...I see a guy holding a several $k lens in the foreground and some guy behind him with a cheap EF-S lens pointed at the ceiling. How do you know he's not just verifying AF motor function.
The real truth, though, might be that the publication's photographer came around and everyone is just doing "something" because he/she is there...I could show you tons of images taken where I work that might look like people working to you, but looked totally staged and ridiculous to me. This is why people need to relax when they see a press shot of anything. Everybody KNOWS there's a photographer there, he's not like a stealthy ninja or something. Sometimes people are told to "look busy" by the photographer just so the shot doesn't look lame and irrelevant to the piece.
If we saw the candid shot, you'd probably have 33% of the people on the phone handling something, 34% checking their FFL, 25% online, posting to POTN, and 8% actually handling some sort of photography equipment.