DThompson Goldmember  4,062 posts Likes: 422 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Georgetown, Ky More info | Nov 16, 2010 21:55 | #1 I've not really tried this level of fix before, so I'd like other opinions please. Is the fix believable? Any and all suggestions/opinions welcome.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Dennis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tristinGrind Senior Member  More info | Nov 16, 2010 21:58 | #2 Looks legit to me... Do you have a full picture without just the mouth crop? -- Tristin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DThompson THREAD STARTER Goldmember 4,062 posts Likes: 422 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Georgetown, Ky More info | Nov 16, 2010 22:09 | #3 tristinGrind wrote in post #11298025  Looks legit to me... Do you have a full picture without just the mouth crop? Thanks. Dennis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RalphIII Goldmember 1,352 posts Likes: 16 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Alabama More info | Yes, it looks believable to me. I would however have left a little more gum between the two middle teeth. Also be careful not to go overboard with such editing, in order to avoid completely changing a persons image. "SOUTHERN and SAVED!"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember  3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Nov 17, 2010 01:28 | #5 What were you fixing ? I actually prefer the one up top--though I don't know if that is the before or after.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Porkywill Member  248 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Weybridge More info | I've been looking at this recently as well... Kit: 7D, Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 OS, Sigma 17-70mm OS, Sigma 30mm 1.4, Canon 50mm 1.8 II, Nissin Di622, Slik Pro 500 DX, SX220, Gorillapod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DThompson THREAD STARTER Goldmember 4,062 posts Likes: 422 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Georgetown, Ky More info | Nov 17, 2010 06:46 | #7 Ralph III wrote in post #11298131 Yes, it looks believable to me. I would however have left a little more gum between the two middle teeth. Also be careful not to go overboard with such editing, in order to avoid completely changing a persons image. God Bless Thanks and I think you're right about the two middle teeth. Christopher Steven b wrote in post #11298921 What were you fixing ? I actually prefer the one up top--though I don't know if that is the before or after. The top is before, I don't know why anyone would add gumline and a little tartar, but..... Porkywill wrote in post #11299374 I've been looking at this recently as well... I think the top set are fine and normal. If anything you could clean the edges up a tad. The second set, whilst neater, actually make the person look like they have really long, square teeth and look unnatural... Jusst my 2p. Will Thanks. Good suggestion. Dennis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop  39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Nov 17, 2010 06:46 | #8 Agree with Will. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy"  5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Nov 17, 2010 08:02 | #9 I also agree with Will. But it's a good retouching exercise for when an image REALLY needs help. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop  More info | Nov 17, 2010 12:09 | #10 D Thompson wrote in post #11299582 Thanks and I think you're right about the two middle teeth. The top is before, I don't know why anyone would add gumline and a little tartar, but.....  Retouching for a glamor type shot to give her the caps/overlay-whatever perfectly straight teeth look that models pay for. Thanks. Good suggestion. I agree that there is nothing at all wrong with the top set, other than a little tartar that can easily be fixed. I'm trying the look that a lot of models/celebs pay for with their teeth. I have so much tartar, I dont have to dip my fishsticks in ****. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DThompson THREAD STARTER Goldmember 4,062 posts Likes: 422 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Georgetown, Ky More info | Nov 17, 2010 16:22 | #11 René Damkot wrote in post #11299583 Agree with Will. Me too. ChasP505 wrote in post #11299839 I also agree with Will. But it's a good retouching exercise for when an image REALLY needs help. Yep, I'll probably work a little more on it. Basically, it was an exercise as I'd never attempted to get the "perfect teeth" look before. JakAHearts wrote in post #11301028 I have so much tartar, I dont have to dip my fishsticks in ****. Anyway, I also prefer the top set. The bottom set looks good on Olympic figure skaters with bad knees or an anorexic teen pop stars. lol, thanks. Dennis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattia Senior Member 528 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2009 More info | Nov 18, 2010 15:41 | #12 Don't do it. The first pic looks like a healthy set of teeth with good gums, the second just looks like bleached teeth with some form of periodontitis (receeding gums) 5DII | 300D | 30D IR | 17-40L | 24-105L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS | 100-400L IS | 15 FE | 35L | 50/1.8 mk I | 135L | Sigmalux 50/1.4 | Sigma 105/F2.8 Macro | C/Y Planar 50/1.4 | C/Y Distagon 35/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
40dbaby Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: socal More info | Nov 18, 2010 19:33 | #13 |
dalebmartin Member 73 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Nov 18, 2010 19:37 | #14 I think it looks good. Gripped Canon 7D,Canon 24-105mm F4 L, Canon 100 Macro IS L, 580EX II, Manfrotto 055CF, 70-200 2.8 Mk II L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1131 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
