this is only my second time useing my bigma,i know they are not that good,but i did handhold these shots.
scottstokes Senior Member 642 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2004 Location: cumming,GA More info | Sep 02, 2005 16:44 | #1 this is only my second time useing my bigma,i know they are not that good,but i did handhold these shots. 50d ,50 1.8,420ex,,tameron 19-35,tamron28-75,sigma70-200 2.8,bigma,24-70L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dragonslayer Senior Member 862 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2005 More info | Sep 02, 2005 17:28 | #2 Get a tripod or monopod, clean that feeder off it's very dirty. I prefer the feeders without perches on them as you can set up small branches off the place you hang the feeder and they will perch up on those giving you cleaner shots. The first image looks pretty good on exposure but really needs some flash to pull up some details around the eye, Also if you set up near you minimum focusing distance most humming birds will get use to your presence and allow you pretty close as long as you do not make fast movements. Get the feeder set where the sun will help you with the shots either in the morning or the evening. Second shot also needs flash or you need to orient the feeder to where the sun will help you with faster shutter speeds and try higher ISO settings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks for info. i will use my tripod next time and i have cleaned the feeder.i did not think about flash.thanks scott 50d ,50 1.8,420ex,,tameron 19-35,tamron28-75,sigma70-200 2.8,bigma,24-70L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwgross Cream of the Crop 9,462 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2002 Location: California More info | For hummingbirds, cleaning up my hummingbird feeder was not enough. It still looked ugly. So, I bought some silk flowers and attached them around the feeder. The hummingbirds still go there to hit the nectar port, but it looks more natural.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dragonslayer Senior Member 862 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2005 More info | scott stokes wrote: thanks for the info.i went back out and shot with my flash it is late here but did not turn out to bad. Looks better and more balanced I think, now to get about 5 foot closer here and then a little more you will get there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks Dragonslayer thanks i was about 10ft futher on this shot they were not shure what i was doing i think.thanks very much for info. 50d ,50 1.8,420ex,,tameron 19-35,tamron28-75,sigma70-200 2.8,bigma,24-70L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dragonslayer Senior Member 862 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2005 More info | scott stokes wrote: thanks Dragonslayer thanks i was about 10ft futher on this shot they were not shure what i was doing i think.thanks very much for info. You are welcome and you might want to try and adjust your AE compensation down at least one third, maybe two, and read your book about how to set your flash exposure compensation and set that minus one at least as you get in closer, many more flash tricks to learn but that is way to much typing
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks again,i do know how to use flash comp. on camera and on my sigma flash i will try again in the morning. thanks alot scott stokes. 50d ,50 1.8,420ex,,tameron 19-35,tamron28-75,sigma70-200 2.8,bigma,24-70L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2022 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||