Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 17 Nov 2010 (Wednesday) 14:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Archiving RAW Files

 
Tim ­ S
Goldmember
Avatar
1,496 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Nov 17, 2010 14:36 |  #1

I am seeking info on what others do to archive RAW files. Going from 8MP to 10MP and now 15MP with the 50D has present space complications. I have been saving on multiple drives but am interested in using DVD's also. My problem is my computer (or possibly just the DVD drive) doesn't seem to like RAW's. The last several attempts have given error codes and not all files were valid. The drive seems to be working OK-plays CD and DVD disks, burns CDs.

Any ideas?


Tim
Equipment

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Nov 17, 2010 15:08 |  #2

Burning DVDs is slow and labor intensive. You can get a 1TB external hard drive for less than $100. That works out to be slightly more expensive that DVDs if you buy them on sale in quantities of 100, but you will spend a lot less of your time doing the copying.

I use the Adobe DNG converter to convert all my RAW files, then copy both the RAW and DNG to a 750GB external drive, than make a second copy on a 1TB external drive, and leave the originals on my internal drive. Haven't figured out yet if that is the best strategy (or even a good one), but at least I have multiple copies of all images and, I hope, am somewhat future-proofed.


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 17, 2010 15:53 |  #3

Hard disks are cheap. Put a 2TB drive in your PC, and get a 2TB drive to keep offsite as a backup. All drives fail, the only question is when. I keep three copies, one CR2, one DNG, one jpeg, spread across different disks and locations. If I edit an image I keep the PSD too.

DVDs are expensive, burning is slow and manual, and the reliability is poor.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Nov 17, 2010 17:50 |  #4

Storage is cheap. Get larger drives.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1555
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Nov 17, 2010 20:01 |  #5

Try reading through this:

http://www.dpbestflow.​org/links/39 (external link)

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Nov 18, 2010 10:57 |  #6

I outgrew and stopped using DVDs for storage a while ago. They are a real hassle to burn and store.

Big hard drives have come down dramatically in price, so there's little reason not to go with them instead of DVDs.

The first thing I'd look into is either replacing smaller drive(s) with bigger, and/or adding a second (or third or whatever) hard drive to your computer, assuming it's a desktop. Most have room for at least one additional drive. Some have room for many more.

My primary desktop has a 1TB drive for softwares, general purpose and a partition for Photoshop to use as a scratch disk. There's a second 1TB data drive used strictly for recent image storage.

If yours is a fairly recent computer, with SATA connectivity, it's very simple to install a drive and get it set up. And you can get 1 or 2TB drives pretty inexpensively. I recommend using "enterprise class" hard drives, in particular. They are a little more expensive, but typically have five year warranties and are designed with large, server applications in mind, where they run 24/7/365. They consume less power and are better built to give long, long service life. Both Western Digital and Seagate offer these types of drives. I'm sure some others do, too.

On location I use a laptop with a 750GB external drive, which attaches with USB or eSATA. It's convenient, but not quite as fast to write to and retrieve from when using USB connectivity, compared to an internal drive.

Now for backup current work and archiving previous years' images, I currently use three Netgear NAS servers (external link) on a simple, wired network. Each contains four 1TB drives, but using RAID X they only provide for 2.7TB storage space per server. But it's worth it since each server also backs itself up. I can replace any individual disk in the server if it crashes, and the server will automatically rebuild the new disk without any data loss.

I'm going to be adding a hot swap tray to my desk top, so that I can use 1 and 2TB drives for incremental backups to be stored off site. An off site, secondary backup might be important if I ever have a disaster wipe out stuff on site, such as a fire or flood or theft.

Chances are the "corrupted" files are fine, but you just have way too much on the hard disk. Once you get about 90% full, things slow down and errors start to happen. Move stuff off the disk and see if that helps. Hopefully the images are fine. You might need to run an image rescue/repair software on them... such as Lexar and Sandisk sometimes provide.

Another common cause of RAW file corruption is when transferring them. I had issues with a memory card reader causing occasional corrupted files when the reader was attached to a USB hub. It works flawlessly when connected directly to the computer, though.

I've gotten more ruthless about editing, as camera resolution has increased and image file sizes have grown and grown. Currently using a pair of 7D and 5DII, so I fill up drives and NAS servers pretty fast!


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danpass
Goldmember
Avatar
2,134 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Naples, FL
     
Nov 18, 2010 11:01 |  #7

Is there any loss in dynamic range, wb, color when converting CR2/NEF to DNG?

I just tried some and they're ~19% smaller file sizes (this was NEF to DNG)


Dan
Gallery (external link) | Gear/Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcd01
Goldmember
Avatar
2,429 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
     
Nov 18, 2010 11:12 |  #8

I would be concerned about putting all your marbles in the machine. Hard drive are mechanical and will wear out and they do not necessarily give you notice. I would never consider putting all my pics on either a main or backup drive in my computer without a separate copy somewhere else. My preference is a separate hard drive housing with a eSATA interface so I can quickly copy the files over to this drive and then remove and power down that drive from the system. I do not erase the pics from the CF cards until I have two distinct separate copies !) one for editing and 2) one stored externally to my computer. I feel comfortable with that policy.


bcd01 - devices of enjoyment list :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
juiceman72
Member
65 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Nov 18, 2010 11:28 |  #9

Anyone here use dual layer blu-ray discs for archival? The price is down to about $9-$10/disc, not too bad for 50GB of storage. I'm curious how long it takes to burn that much data.


Justin

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danpass
Goldmember
Avatar
2,134 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Naples, FL
     
Nov 18, 2010 11:30 |  #10

the thing with pressed disks is that they can go bad even in a good environment while hard drives are sealed (and faster)


Dan
Gallery (external link) | Gear/Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaronwoodallphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,670 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined May 2006
Location: Dark side of the Womb
     
Nov 18, 2010 11:57 |  #11

ok, this can sound difficult... but here is my .02

i use the non-commercial version of Logmein Hamachi. ----"which is free"

and create a network from my Home PC, to my Workstation @ work.

Share your pictures folders, on both machines...

then use SyncToy from Micro$oft ---"which is free too", and it will assign a "master folder" and the other an EXACT mirror of the other...

---------------

or you could just buy one of these...

Network Storage Unit (external link)

and just slap two drives in it, set it to mirror the disks and let it manage the whole thing... it also has an email alert system to let you know if a drive is failing.


"Only when you've learned all the rules have you earned the right to break them."
FaceBook (external link) / 500px (external link) / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 18, 2010 13:27 |  #12

danpass wrote in post #11306686 (external link)
Is there any loss in dynamic range, wb, color when converting CR2/NEF to DNG?

I just tried some and they're ~19% smaller file sizes (this was NEF to DNG)

It's the exact same data with lossless compression. It's smaller as a computer has more time and CPU power than the chip inside the camera, which compresses but quickly. So DNG = CR2 + metadata.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Nov 18, 2010 13:55 |  #13

juiceman72 wrote in post #11306804 (external link)
Anyone here use dual layer blu-ray discs for archival? The price is down to about $9-$10/disc, not too bad for 50GB of storage. I'm curious how long it takes to burn that much data.

Takes about 3 hours. PITA, but I go from camera to 1TB USB drive, then build of batches of 50GB to burn at a time. The real pain is catching up to what you've already shot, and burning the existing images. I had 400GB to burn before I was fully caught up. Time consuming, even if you have a dedicated PC for the burning.

I love the idea of keeping multiple large USB drives around, even 2TB drives are getting reasonably cheap. Problem is, I can't realistically expect that drive to be 100% functional 5-10 years from now. I can burn a disc once, sleeve it up and store it away, and expect it will be there (and readable) even 15-20+ years from now.

Depends if you're interested in long-term storage, or short-medium term storage.


[ www (external link)ยท flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mguffin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,627 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Allendale, NJ
     
Nov 18, 2010 14:01 |  #14

Make 2 backups of your files to hard disk.
Copy 1, should be an external drive connected to your computer, either daily or weekly depending on how much work you do. This drive you can leave connected so your backups are more convenient.
Copy 2, should be an external drive, either monthly or weekly, and that drive should be disconnected and put in a closet or safe deposit box...
Those 2 copies are in addition to the originals you have on your computer.


Mike
Nikon D800 ~ Nikon D500
Sigma 35 f/1.4 DG ~ Nikkor 50 f/1.8G ~ Nikkor 85 f/1.8G ~ Nikkor 12-24 f/4 DX ~ Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 DX ~ Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 VR ~ Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 DC ~ Sigma 50-100 f/1.8 DC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 18, 2010 14:21 |  #15

I don't agree with having external disks permanently connected. A virus or stupid user can delete them. It also means another power supply plugged in, which I don't like. You'd be better off with an internal mirror, which has no power supply and is much much faster on sata.

I have one offsite backup of my working files, which I consider secure enough. Once i'm done with a customer file it's archived to a disk which sits in a drawer, and is also copied to my offsite archive.

In case anyone's wondering yes that means I have two offsite disks - mirror of my active drives, and a mirror of my archive drive. Both are eSata. The archive mirror is DNG/jpeg, the archive drive at home is CR2/jpeg. Just hedging my bets really.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,991 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Archiving RAW Files
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1237 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.