lungdoc wrote in post #11320867
My main rationale for DNG is storage of the conversion info within the files and not in sidecars for those who use Lightroom (or ACR). It is also an open standard though i seriously doubt that CR2's would ever be impossible to read either.
Were any of those prior DNG problems ever associated with subsequently unreadable files?
My main rationale for DNG is storage of the conversion info within the files and not in sidecars for those who use Lightroom (or ACR). It is also an open standard though i seriously doubt that CR2's would ever be impossible to read either.
Were any of those prior DNG problems ever associated with subsequently unreadable files?
You can read about the issues with those two releases in these links. Bear in mind these blog posts were written by Lightroom's Program Manager so many of the problems are minimized. you'd have to read the support forums to get a flavor of all the complaints.
http://blogs.adobe.com …131_and_camera_raw_4.html
http://blogs.adobe.com …lightroom_14_and_cam.html
If you had a Nikon D100, converted those files to DNG and deleted the CR2, you were basically screwed.
