Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 19 Nov 2010 (Friday) 19:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

how much to clean a lens?

 
angelIV
Goldmember
Avatar
1,143 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 19, 2010 19:30 |  #1

just a quick questions how much do canon charge to clean a lens, just specks of dust no fungus. or would keh be a good option. thanks


Gear list: 7d, 50d, xti, EOS 66 film, Canon FTB,sigma 18-35 1.8 art len, EF 24-105L, 70-200f4. Manfrotto 190xpro, sirui g20x. BR metro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
angelIV
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,143 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 19, 2010 19:46 |  #2

my problem is i purchased a lens from the sell forum with a seller saying a 9.5 rating on the glass. when it arrived it has dust specks inside the lens, since its not showing in the pics i let it go, but im so anal with my gears, sold 3 lens that are more than 6 y/o and you wont see any dust on it or inside the glass. just want the dust gone. anyone has an idea on how much it cost. thanks


Gear list: 7d, 50d, xti, EOS 66 film, Canon FTB,sigma 18-35 1.8 art len, EF 24-105L, 70-200f4. Manfrotto 190xpro, sirui g20x. BR metro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lannes
Goldmember
Avatar
4,370 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Nov 19, 2010 19:47 |  #3

I wouldn't clean internal dust unless it's effecting the image quality, once clean it won't take long to come back as it probably has something to do with the lens seal design.

If the lens is sharp now, cleaning could alter this, at least through Canon service you could get them to recalibrate it.

Did you ask the seller about internal dust ?


1Dx, 1DM4, 5DM2, 7D, EOS-M, 8-15L, 17-40L, 24 TSE II, 24-105L, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 200L f/2.8, 300L f/4, 70-200L II, 70-300L, 400Lf/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
casaaviocar
Senior Member
Avatar
887 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Nov 19, 2010 19:57 |  #4

I wouldn't bother with the cleaning. A couple of specs of dust won't do anything to effect the image quality and having some dust internally is pretty common. I'm amazed you managed to make it 6 years with no dust. I wouldn't think to mention a little dust internally either.


Rule books are paper they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal -ekg-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angelIV
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,143 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 19, 2010 20:15 |  #5

lannes wrote in post #11315044 (external link)
I wouldn't clean internal dust unless it's effecting the image quality, once clean it won't take long to come back as it probably has something to do with the lens seal design.

If the lens is sharp now, cleaning could alter this, at least through Canon service you could get them to recalibrate it.

Did you ask the seller about internal dust ?

thanks, lens is sharped needed to clean the contact points, as for the seller he stand by his post of 9.5/10 rate. the price was ok so i let it go, im just so anal with my gear.


Gear list: 7d, 50d, xti, EOS 66 film, Canon FTB,sigma 18-35 1.8 art len, EF 24-105L, 70-200f4. Manfrotto 190xpro, sirui g20x. BR metro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angelIV
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,143 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 19, 2010 20:24 |  #6

casaaviocar wrote in post #11315082 (external link)
I wouldn't bother with the cleaning. A couple of specs of dust won't do anything to effect the image quality and having some dust internally is pretty common. I'm amazed you managed to make it 6 years with no dust. I wouldn't think to mention a little dust internally either.

yup my 55-200 usm crystal clear when i sold it 2 month ago also my 28-135 usm clear even the buyer was asking if it came in a kit. told him that i got it from a local store in 2006 and this was my walk around lens. everything sold with their box. cant say the same with my xti heavily used. my eos d60 and ftb are still prestine. may be its really just me being anal about it but a 9.5 rating for the glass i was expecting more.


Gear list: 7d, 50d, xti, EOS 66 film, Canon FTB,sigma 18-35 1.8 art len, EF 24-105L, 70-200f4. Manfrotto 190xpro, sirui g20x. BR metro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Nov 19, 2010 22:12 |  #7

He should have mentioned that there was/were a few dust specks inside, imo.

With that said, I would not pay to have them removed.

Canon does not have a "clean" room. You might end up with more dust then you started ;-)a


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 512
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Nov 19, 2010 22:22 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Wait a minute, how could you not have a lens with dust inside? Do you shoot all weather sealed L lenses? Even some of the weather sealed lenses are also prone to attract some dust. I say leave the dust or lens alone. "Dust" is part of the DSLR experience. Is same as you can't expect your sensor to have no dust. OMG, you are going to check the sensor now for dust.....:) Beware you don't scratch your sensor trying to sterilize your sensor...


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
casaaviocar
Senior Member
Avatar
887 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Nov 20, 2010 00:33 |  #9

angelIV wrote in post #11315207 (external link)
yup my 55-200 usm crystal clear when i sold it 2 month ago also my 28-135 usm clear even the buyer was asking if it came in a kit. told him that i got it from a local store in 2006 and this was my walk around lens. everything sold with their box. cant say the same with my xti heavily used. my eos d60 and ftb are still prestine. may be its really just me being anal about it but a 9.5 rating for the glass i was expecting more.

I guess I don't consider a couple of specks of dust to be a flaw on the glass. Fungus, that's a flaw, a scratch that's a flaw, cleaning marks, that's a flaw, damaged coating, yep, dust, nah. Just like dust on a sensor, there's nothing wrong with the sensor, it's still 100%, it just has a couple of specks of dust on it. I've had cameras straight out of the box with dust on the sensor. Is there anything wrong with the sensor, nope.


Rule books are paper they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal -ekg-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angelIV
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,143 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 20, 2010 19:30 |  #10

casaaviocar wrote in post #11315989 (external link)
I guess I don't consider a couple of specks of dust to be a flaw on the glass. Fungus, that's a flaw, a scratch that's a flaw, cleaning marks, that's a flaw, damaged coating, yep, dust, nah. Just like dust on a sensor, there's nothing wrong with the sensor, it's still 100%, it just has a couple of specks of dust on it. I've had cameras straight out of the box with dust on the sensor. Is there anything wrong with the sensor, nope.

just a quick question what would you consider as a couple of speck of dust? when you look at the viewfeinder you see 1 or 2 black dots? or more than that or when you look into the lens you see a lot of strands inside the lens even after you cleaned it? i agree with you on this, i know dust is common and as normal in camera gear, just wnted to know what others consider ok when it comes to the dust issue?


Gear list: 7d, 50d, xti, EOS 66 film, Canon FTB,sigma 18-35 1.8 art len, EF 24-105L, 70-200f4. Manfrotto 190xpro, sirui g20x. BR metro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angelIV
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,143 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2010
     
Nov 20, 2010 19:37 |  #11

bohdank wrote in post #11315618 (external link)
He should have mentioned that there was/were a few dust specks inside, imo.

With that said, I would not pay to have them removed.

Canon does not have a "clean" room. You might end up with more dust then you started ;-)a

thanks, i think i have to live with it. may be sell it next year when im able to afford a new upgrade.


Gear list: 7d, 50d, xti, EOS 66 film, Canon FTB,sigma 18-35 1.8 art len, EF 24-105L, 70-200f4. Manfrotto 190xpro, sirui g20x. BR metro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FuturamaJSP
Goldmember
Avatar
2,227 posts
Likes: 81
Joined Oct 2009
     
Nov 20, 2010 19:54 |  #12

I don't think you guys know that there are people out there who simply can't stand having dust inside or even outside their lenses and cameras. Personally I clean my gear whenever I see there are dust or dirt on them and prefer to have lenses that are weather sealed. One of the main reasons why I have two bodies is because I don't want to change lenses too often to avoid dust getting inside the lenses and cameras. Though I haven't sent anything in for cleaning yet but I have been told that it would cost around 100 bucks to get a lens cleaned.


They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
blah blah blah
DA (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikebarry
Member
Avatar
59 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Houston, TX
     
Nov 20, 2010 19:56 |  #13

just checked my 2 yr old 70-200 f/2.8L, I do see some dust on the inner lenses, maybe 10 specks or so. Does it affect IQ? I guess since I don't have a perfectly clean copy I couldn't say for sure, but I can't see any IQ issues. I would think dust on the sensor is orders of magnitude worse than dust on the lenses. The further from the sensor the dust is, the less light it blocks.

I wouldn't think a few specks of dust in the lens would show up in your viewfinder. If anything, dust on the lenses would show up in the form of a fuzzy or soft image.


60D, Canon EF 85 f/1.8, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS, EX-580II, Nikon Coolpix in my shirt pocket.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcd01
Goldmember
Avatar
2,428 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
     
Nov 20, 2010 20:04 |  #14

I was documenting some grounding work a contractor did at our tower site and the edge gave way and I fell into a ditch with a body and my 24-105 L. Sand got into the barrel. I sent it back to Canon in Newport News, Virginia. The cost was $187 including shipping. Their shipping by FedEx cost more than what it cost me to send it to them by FedEx. Overall, it was about $200.


bcd01 - devices of enjoyment list :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 512
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Nov 20, 2010 20:07 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

mikebarry wrote in post #11319096 (external link)
just checked my 2 yr old 70-200 f/2.8L, I do see some dust on the inner lenses, maybe 10 specks or so. Does it affect IQ? I guess since I don't have a perfectly clean copy I couldn't say for sure, but I can't see any IQ issues. I would think dust on the sensor is orders of magnitude worse than dust on the lenses. The further from the sensor the dust is, the less light it blocks.

I wouldn't think a few specks of dust in the lens would show up in your viewfinder. If anything, dust on the lenses would show up in the form of a fuzzy or soft image.

Dust on the lens would never show up on your shots. On the sensor, yes. Even with a cracked front element, you would only see some slight blurring on your shots. Also, I would never miss a shot just because I afraid to change the right lens for the scene. If you are a prime shooter, good luck trying to keep dust out of your sensor and your lens. Maybe you carry 2 to 3 bodies with you. I thought people shooting with 2 bodies or more do it for the speed and quickness factors as in sport photography. Not so much for dust. Could you imagine doing a landscape shot with some nature scenes bringing 2 or more bodies with you?


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

13,110 views & 0 likes for this thread
how much to clean a lens?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Sureshot99
456 guests, 371 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.