Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 20 Nov 2010 (Saturday) 15:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CC please

 
dynamic03
Senior Member
341 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 20, 2010 15:35 |  #1

With Effects:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


Here is the original:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


Let me know what you guys think.

Canon 5D Mark II | 135mm L | 24-70mm L | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 50mm f/1.8
Wedding Photography (external link)
Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Nov 20, 2010 15:54 |  #2

I like the original best. The background is "softer".


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TiaS
Member
239 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 20, 2010 15:56 |  #3

I personally prefer the first one over the original




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yjt
Senior Member
359 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Nov 20, 2010 16:12 |  #4

I don't know how to explain it, but i like the first one better than the original


7D (Gripped) || 24-70 f2.8L || 50 f1.4 || 70-200mm f4L
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corkneyfonz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,477 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Nov 20, 2010 18:43 |  #5

I would have preferred to have seen the whole section of grass ie camera in portrait mode although I do like the effect achieved.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dynamic03
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
341 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 20, 2010 20:35 |  #6

corkneyfonz wrote in post #11318787 (external link)
I would have preferred to have seen the whole section of grass ie camera in portrait mode although I do like the effect achieved.

Yea I have a portrait shot as well but for some reason I like this shot more...thanks


Canon 5D Mark II | 135mm L | 24-70mm L | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 50mm f/1.8
Wedding Photography (external link)
Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaycky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,089 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bancouver okanagan alberta
     
Nov 20, 2010 23:40 |  #7

rw2 wrote in post #11318214 (external link)
I like the original best. The background is "softer".

me 2


5DM2 /grip Lots Of L's
measurbating f-stops
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/52633882@N07/ (external link)
http://about.me/jbmpho​tos (external link)
http://photobyfish.tum​blr.com/archive (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Nov 20, 2010 23:56 as a reply to  @ jaycky's post |  #8

Guess it depends on what look you're after. My first impression is that I prefer the first; more dramatic.


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Nov 21, 2010 00:11 |  #9

My first impression is WEEDS! The images are well executed and the post processing is quite good but to what end? Is this something you would hang on your wall in say a 24x36?


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dynamic03
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
341 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 21, 2010 01:27 |  #10

Titus213 wrote in post #11319971 (external link)
My first impression is WEEDS! The images are well executed and the post processing is quite good but to what end? Is this something you would hang on your wall in say a 24x36?

Not sure if its a "hang on the wall" picture, I'm thinking of putting it in a calendar.


Canon 5D Mark II | 135mm L | 24-70mm L | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 50mm f/1.8
Wedding Photography (external link)
Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Nov 21, 2010 06:20 as a reply to  @ dynamic03's post |  #11

The colors in the original are much more natural looking, and the bokeh isn't as harsh as that of the processed version. Unfortunately, not much beyond that. From a compositional standpoint, the top has been cropped off, the main stalk is OOF as well as parts of the head, either due to a too shallow DOF or movement from a breeze. Your choice to put in a calendar or not, but I'd do a re-shoot.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FrontElement
Member
82 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Israel, Rishon Le-Zion
     
Nov 21, 2010 13:24 |  #12

I like the first one, but thats because the effect gives a high contrast to the weed buds, and as a result creating a more poping texture which attracts the eyes, the original one has smooth bokeh but its flatter on the texture,
also, the first image puts the weed buds in a much more darker color than the background, unlike the original image which makes it look as if it blends with the background in terms of color, so it also contributes to the sense of flatness,

easy picking for me, i go with the 1st one


My Gear : 5D MKII, 24-70mm f/2.8L, EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM, EX580II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dynamic03
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
341 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 21, 2010 13:52 |  #13

FrontElement wrote in post #11321964 (external link)
I like the first one, but thats because the effect gives a high contrast to the weed buds, and as a result creating a more poping texture which attracts the eyes, the original one has smooth bokeh but its flatter on the texture,
also, the first image puts the weed buds in a much more darker color than the background, unlike the original image which makes it look as if it blends with the background in terms of color, so it also contributes to the sense of flatness,

easy picking for me, i go with the 1st one

Thanks, you pretty much summarized why I like the first one :)


Canon 5D Mark II | 135mm L | 24-70mm L | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 50mm f/1.8
Wedding Photography (external link)
Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Nov 21, 2010 16:42 |  #14

Titus213 wrote in post #11319971 (external link)
My first impression is WEEDS! The images are well executed and the post processing is quite good but to what end? Is this something you would hang on your wall in say a 24x36?

This is how I felt.

Good image and I like the 1st one better, but just an OK picture to me - because of the boring subject matter. I'd also have kept the entire top weed instead of cropping the top off.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

884 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
CC please
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2686 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.