Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 21 Nov 2010 (Sunday) 06:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1st attempt w/ off camera flash and my daughters

 
jodelak
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,463 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
     
Nov 22, 2010 10:53 |  #16

i like the entire set but #3 makes it for me. love the pose and the capture of the eyes.


... does it really matter?i see with my eyes, i shoot with my fingers.
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kyle_4375
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Cincinnati, OH
     
Nov 22, 2010 12:18 |  #17

ChuckingFluff wrote in post #11326663 (external link)
What an awesome set of pics and who says an XT can't be used for taking professional looking pictures. You've just proved it's the photographer that makes the pictures not the gear.

WOW, thanks for the feedback!!!


Canon 50D | Tamron 17-50 | Tamron 70-300 | Nifty Fifty | 430ex | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimFly
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Nov 23, 2010 06:34 |  #18

Beautiful set IMHO


Canon 7D | Canon 40D | Canon 430 EX II
Tamron 17-50 F2.8 XR Di II | Canon EF 70-200 f/4 L USM | Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8 L USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YankeeMom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,120 posts
Gallery: 312 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 470
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Wisconsin
     
Nov 23, 2010 15:09 |  #19

I say good job, too! And I like the color just fine (better than the B&W, though it's always fun to add one conversion to a set.) So -- were those taken with your Tamron or 50? :)


Kristin
Mom to 11 ~ Still sane and rocking my Canon 5DMkII.
Calibrated with Spyder 4
Website (external link)
| Blog (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | 500px (external link) | Pinterest (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Delija
Goldmember
Avatar
1,095 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Nov 23, 2010 17:08 |  #20

ChuckingFluff wrote in post #11326663 (external link)
..... I always find B&W is a cop out for people that can't get the color right,.

WOW!!!

First time I ever heard that one!

First off, unless there's an incorrect setting, color - especially when processed into a jpeg in the camera is a function of the camera, not the photographer. I have never heard of anyone who "can't get the color right" :rolleyes: Seriously - you wrote that and believe it?

Color (unless the exposure is horribly off) can be easily adjusted with the most basic free software - Also if color is off, it's most often something simple like incorrect white balance. People set it and then forget they custom set it indoors and then use it outdoors or with a flash - mistakes anyone can make that have nothing to do with ability. Shooting in RAW may make fixing bad color more flexible, but even a JPEG out-of-camera can almost always be corrected enough to be at least acceptable.

Every brand of camera seems to have its own color characteristics. If you don't like the in-camera processing of brand X but like brand Y, then use brand Y - No skill required in choosing a camera that produces colors of a personal preference.

-Shooting in black and white takes real skill - it requires the understanding of light and shadow and contrast - it's something you need to see in your mind's eye before you press the shutter button, unlike shooting color where "what you see is what you get" - no surprises, all wrapped up with a pretty bow in advance.

Ever heard of the artistic technique called "chiaroscuro"? When I was in film school I had two courses that were essentially based on that one technique alone. One of which required me to draw with charcoal and also with pencil and paper (I had my pretty color crayons when I was in kindergarten) - my drawing talent was very limited to say the least - but I quickly learned that wasn't really important - Although I did improve over time. (good instructors know how to teach)

....those courses probably did more for me than anything else in a very long formal education in photography followed by over 40 years working in film and TV - ultimately finding my niche in lighting.

So my response to the quoted statement above can only be:

Anyone who can't shoot black and white and use light properly to create depth, dimension and drama can "cop out" and shoot color -just get the light nice and even - make sure there are no nasty shadows, and yeah - everything will look great. And excruciatingly boring since everything will look as dramatic as the lighting does on a TV talk show. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

There's an old and often repeated saying in the world of photography - I have noticed that more than one person here uses it as their signature.

"Amateurs worry about equipment. Professionals worry about money. Masters worry about light".
(Anon.)

No mention of color -

Another of my favorite photography quotes is:
“The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it.” —Ansel Adams





Peace,
D.


Wow, what a nice picture! You must have a really great camera!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shotsbysheryl
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Central Mississippi
     
Nov 23, 2010 18:01 |  #21

I love number 3! It's cute! I think they're good for a 1st try!


Canon 5Dii, 60D, 24-70L 2.8, 50 1.4, 580 ex ii, Canon AE-1 Program, Mamiya 645, AB800's, cyber syncs
www.sheryllynn.net (external link)
www.facebook.com/shery​llynnphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kyle_4375
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Cincinnati, OH
     
Nov 23, 2010 18:33 |  #22

YankeeMom wrote in post #11334637 (external link)
So -- were those taken with your Tamron or 50? :)

Taken with the Tamron :)


Canon 50D | Tamron 17-50 | Tamron 70-300 | Nifty Fifty | 430ex | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YankeeMom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,120 posts
Gallery: 312 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 470
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Wisconsin
     
Nov 23, 2010 18:37 |  #23

kyle_4375 wrote in post #11335736 (external link)
Taken with the Tamron :)

That's great to know -- I've had that non-IS version on my radar for awhile (to replace the kit lens, 18-55.) I haven't seen many samples with it and I compare everything, photo-quality-wise, to my 50. I feel better about getting that (but it will be awhile.) Thanks. :)


Kristin
Mom to 11 ~ Still sane and rocking my Canon 5DMkII.
Calibrated with Spyder 4
Website (external link)
| Blog (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | 500px (external link) | Pinterest (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,856 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
1st attempt w/ off camera flash and my daughters
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2886 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.