Collecting Pics Of Lenses. Care to Contribute?

msowsun wrote in post #7520370
35-135 USM with non-standard hood. (works well with a crop camera)

The original ET-62 hood works too but because it is shaped slightly differently at the bottom, it won't fit reversed on the lens like the II version does. Did you notice that the "correct" EW-62 is identical (except the printing) to the ES-62 for the 50/1.8 II?

The EF 28-90mm 1:4-5.6 III. 28-90s were popular kit lenses with the later film EOS cameras. Canon made five different versions of the 28-90mm with some also available with a silver finish. This one is the latest of them and it is available in a silver model as well. It is only 190g so it is small and weighs almost nothing. These can be had used very cheaply. Mine was new in box when I bought it so the plastic movements are quite tight. Other used ones I have seen are more loose so I presume that they wear in.

Optically it has quite good contrast but it doesn't seem to resolve fine details so you get images that can appear sharp but are not quite as detailed as if you had used an expensive lens. It focuses to a respectable 0.3x magnification and handles close-up filters pretty well. It seems sharpest near the close-focus limit where it does quite well. Focus is quite quick and accurate and nearly silent even though it isn't a USM lens.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Newest addition, Olympus OM Zuiko 28/3.5. Might lack a bit speed, but the size of it!! Oh and it's as sharp as the L f3.5 vs f4. Best thing, it set me back about 50usd.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

XSi and 17-55mm 2.8 IS

The legendary classic Nikon 105/2.5 Nikkor...one of the earliest versions marked as 105cm and with only feet to mark the distance
My first lens other than the 50/2 that came with my first slr, a Nikkormat FS...now a new one sits on my XT...

No studio shots here, just some quick snaps:

Sigma 70-300mm APO:

nice... hey ben any possible way to take a comparison shot of the 18-55 next to the 70-200? im gauging how big it will be and if its too big ill have to get the f4 instead of your nice 2.8 thanks!

My newest acquisition, the TS-E 24 f/3.5L:

Here is one I haven't seen on here. 80-200 no Is no USM all plastic.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

WillOPhotos wrote in post #7519804

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Excuse my convulsions and drooling, LOL. I would kill someone for any one piece of that equipment, I want a Mac so BAD.

Where's the camera!?...Just kidding, that 70-200 2.8L IS looks huge on the XTi

BenJohnson wrote in post #7591758
No studio shots here, just some quick snaps:

Canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS on 400D w/grip

borism wrote in post #6334136
Ive just found a little treasure
My wife found my (very) old EOS 650 with its 50mm f1.8 (non mark II)
The lens works perfect (after 18 years) !
I cant believe how more sturdy and better build the old 50mm is compared to the 50 f1.8 II.
It has the little focus distance window and a metal mount and nice focus ring.
I'll take a better pic later and mount it here, but for now is mounted in my XSI
here it is the EOS 650 with my new , old 50mm f1.8

Mine still works great too. This was my first film camera, my yearbook teacher gave it to me.

DL.Photography wrote in post #7594682
Where's the camera!?...Just kidding, that 70-200 2.8L IS looks huge on the XTi

You should see it without the grip!

silvrr wrote in post #7594201
Here is one I haven't seen on here. 80-200 no Is no USM all plastic.

"Already got one." Your pictures are nicer.

https://photography-on-the.net …?p=6918009&post​count=1547

Action shot:

there is a brand new in the box 22-55 for sale locally .... hmmm, I wonder if I should pick it up !