Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 24 Nov 2010 (Wednesday) 16:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Troy's Astro Actions - some Photoshop Actions for processing astro images

 
troypiggo
Goldmember
Avatar
4,743 posts
Likes: 172
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Post edited over 2 years ago by troypiggo. (2 edits in all)
     
Nov 24, 2010 16:25 |  #1

Catchy name eh? :)

I've been playing around with Photoshop, learning some astro image processing tips and tricks along with way. I am no expert at astro imaging, nor am I an expert at Photoshop. But rather than doing the same things over and over in PS, I've recorded some of (what I think are) the cooler ones into an action set. Thought some here might be interested. Especially since they're free.

The idea is that they are not a one-stop-shop for astro tools, but rather supplement other astro software I use, or fill in gaps of what other software doesn't do. You may have already seen my post on the "Get your astro software here" thread. In addition to that, there is the excellent Noel Carboni's Photoshop Astronomy Tools Action Set (external link). Check them out.

So what do my actions do? I'll write a better description of all of them later, but the one I'm most happy with is the star removal ones. There's one that takes a layer of your astro image and separates into 2 different layers the background/nebula and the stars. There is also an action to just strip the stars away, and a separate one to just extract the stars into their own layer. Note that the starless image will probably need a little bit of a manual tidy up with the clone tool still, but I think it's worth it.

As an example, here's an example of my NGC6334 Cat's Paw Nebula without stars:

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4107/5202872843_bdd814acae.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …piggo/520287284​3/lightbox  (external link)

Here's what it looked like with stars:
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4106/5191831366_b523eebfbb.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …piggo/519183136​6/lightbox  (external link)

The starless image may not be to everyone's taste as a final image, but it does mean you can concentrate your processing on the nebulosity without having to worry about blowing out the stars. Then just add the stars back in at the end of processing.

I would appreciate any comments/feedback/bug reports and I'll fix them as we go.

I'll build on the tools and update here along the way. For now, download them here:

Troy's Astro Actions v0.9.1

[edit] - I no longer have a way of hosting these actions, nor the motivation to maintain them. I use PixInsight pretty much exclusively for image editing these days.

"Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
Flickr (external link) | Gear List | Macro Rig | Astro Rig | Astro Software Post

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 24, 2010 18:55 |  #2

I just had a quick play with your actions. I like the star removal/separation. Stars sure can be a pain.
Would you suggest using it earlier or later in the workflow ?


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
troypiggo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,743 posts
Likes: 172
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
     
Nov 24, 2010 19:30 |  #3

G'day mate. Tough question. You need some stars to be able to detect them, but it's better IMO to get rid of them fairly early in the processing. For the example shot above, I did stretch the histogram a couple of times first, did a bit of a white balance and fixing the shadows end of the histogram, then removed the stars, then cloned out some of the remnants (this is mainly the bigger stars only), then continued with the processing to bring out more nebulosity mainly. I'm still playing with the technique a bit. Be fun to swap stories on when and where you implemented it. :)


"Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
Flickr (external link) | Gear List | Macro Rig | Astro Rig | Astro Software Post

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,500 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Troy's Astro Actions - some Photoshop Actions for processing astro images
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1312 guests, 183 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.