Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 24 Nov 2010 (Wednesday) 23:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

In-depth Step-By-Step Editing Workflow

 
NatDeroxL7
Goldmember
Avatar
1,254 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 521
Joined Dec 2009
     
Nov 24, 2010 23:24 |  #1

Here is another step by step of my workflow for you all to see and critique to give me ideas, or to get some ideas of your own.

Capture was with 5D mkII on AV with a 70-200 set to 127mm. It was dark so focus was manually set to infinity, but i will admit, I think I overshot it a bit and the motorcycle was moving so fast I just had to get 'this' shot, I didn't have time to double check my focus. It is a tad soft. Camera was mounted to Benro Travel Angel, weighted down, IS on the lens turned off. Singh-Ray 3-Stop reverse GND filter was used, Cokin P size, used with holder.

Exposure was 1/30th Second at f11 at ISO 100. This was -1 EV. This Exposure was chosen because it preserved the highlights as much as was reasonable, with such a gigantic bright sun in the frame. The Red channel did clip, and the center of the sun blew out completely. I didn't want to do HDR because of the rapidly moving herd of goats and motorcycle being so important to the shot, and I had to expose those areas enough so that they would register without too much noise. To sum it up, exposure was a compromise chosen based on what I knew I could do in post.

Editing was done in Aperture 3.1

Here is the straight out of camera shot:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


First thing I always do is apply my basic editing setting. Black Point to 1 instead of 3, 25 definition, 1.15 Saturation, 1.35 Vibrancy. In this case I also maxed out recovery due to the highlights and clipping. I also did not like the blueish hue to the road due to the shade, so White Balance was warmed up a tad.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Second thing I did was to dodge the lower portion, so that it would reduce the overall contrast of the image. The reason I did this was because I desired greater contrast and saturation in the midtones, but not degrade where the light was coming through the dust and sheep. Too keep the overall gradation of tones consistent across the entire frame, I feel it works better to reduce the entire contrast of the image then readjust levels across the range, rather than just do a touch of contrast brush or use curves on only a portion of the tonal range.

I erased the dodge adjustment from the area of the light coming through the dust itself, because that is the area I wanted to preserve after the levels adjustment.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Now I adjusted levels across the tonal range to bring the image back to it's intended exposure. You can really start to see the emphasis this brings to the goat herd and the light and dust there.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Then I tackled the issue of the flare. I used a color adjustment, brushed in on the flare only. I eye-droppered the flare color and decreased saturation and luminance. Then I increased the saturation of the other colors so it wouldn't appear grey. I noticed that the local white balance in the flare area was too green after just the colors adjustment, so I applied a curve to the blue channel to pull back the blues from the shadows even more to help balance it with the flare area. It is still noticeable, and I work on it a bit every day, but it is pretty close here.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



The last little detail I wanted to fix was the ring around the sun. I simply blurred the area with the blur brush, making a smooth transition form the white hot center to the yellow and orange sky.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



After that I did one last look at the image as a whole, tweaked the quarter-tone sliders in levels to balance out the color in the shadow areas, and here is the final image!


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Hope you enjoyed, feel free to give me some tips on how I might be able to improve on this. I have some more shots from this night on my FLICKR, the ones used here are in a set called "Step-by-Step 2", there is a previously done set "Step by Step" of another shot that was a bit differently done than this one. You can find my explanation of that one if you look through my post history.

https://www.instagram.​com/nd14411 (external link)
https://natedphoto.myp​ortfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark-B
Goldmember
Avatar
2,248 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
     
Nov 25, 2010 00:39 |  #2

Interesting to see another person's process. I think it came out pretty good.

I was surprised to see that you start by lowering the black point from 3 to 1. I usually increase mine to 4. I also add definition, saturation, and vibrance, but not as much as you.

I hadn't thought to use the blur tool for rings around the sun. I will have to try that next time.

For your green tint on the dirt, have you tried using the tint brush on that area? It might be possible to bring it back around to the color of the rest of the dirt.


Mark-B
msbphoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NatDeroxL7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,254 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 521
Joined Dec 2009
     
Nov 25, 2010 01:38 as a reply to  @ Mark-B's post |  #3

I bring it down to 1 but usually use levels to bring back the blacks. I'd rather use levels to determine what parts of my image are true black than the black point.

My thoughts are usually towards bringing out as much detail as possible using exposure adjustments, then I take away detail to fit the end goal using levels.


https://www.instagram.​com/nd14411 (external link)
https://natedphoto.myp​ortfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NatDeroxL7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,254 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 521
Joined Dec 2009
     
Nov 26, 2010 10:00 |  #4

I got the Nik Complete collection as a christmas gift, so I will now have to work on getting that incorporated into my process.

I'm pretty excited to start dabbling in HDR as even my 3-stop RGND has its limitations.


https://www.instagram.​com/nd14411 (external link)
https://natedphoto.myp​ortfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Abozakaria2009
Member
218 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2009
     
Nov 27, 2010 09:46 |  #5

thanks alot man




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NatDeroxL7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,254 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 521
Joined Dec 2009
     
Nov 28, 2010 21:21 |  #6

I just re-did the photo. making very similar adjustments, only this time I went through the whole processing using Nik Plug-Ins for Aperture.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



Gave it a conversion in Silver Efx just for fun

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



It took less time using the Nik Plugins, and while some results could have been similarly achieved without Nik, Some results results would have only been possible with Nik.

One thing you can't see in photos this size, is that Dfine was able to completely remove all the chroma noise, slight blotches with a particular R, G, or B hue to them, leaving only film-like grain in it's place, with no appreciable loss to detail. I was extremely impressed with Dfine. I have some ISO1600 images on my FLICKR that I ran through Dfine, and at 100%, they now look like they have fine ISO100-320 B&W film noise, rather than ugly digital color noise.

Silver Efx is also amazing on all accounts, I'll never do a regular B%W conversion again.

https://www.instagram.​com/nd14411 (external link)
https://natedphoto.myp​ortfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,644 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
In-depth Step-By-Step Editing Workflow
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1637 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.