Companies LOVE single points of contact for support. If your monitor goes bad, you call Apple. If Final Cut has a bug, you call Apple. If you media server fails, you call Apple. None of the software people blaming the hardware people and so on. When a studio is spending a million dollars a day on production, Apple makes a whole lota sense. It's the same with Avid. Avid solutions cost just as much or more than Apple's do. But, for some reason no one says a word about them. Hummm, very curious indeed.
If that logic were correct, then Windows would not be dominating the corporate world as they do not make PCs.
I don't care, honestly and I am trying to say it doesn't matter what you get. People want to turn this into some kind of religious war, and it is just computers. You load up the software you need on the hardware you need and go to work. If your shop uses Final Cut, then of course windows does not make sense. If your shop uses Premeire or Avid, then it doesn't much matter.
I still maintain that RISC was a primary reason for Apple's early market lead in graphics. If you used Photoshop on a Mac in those days, it was always faster than the equivalent PC. That's not true since the switch to Intel. I


