Engagement: Todd + Sarah

1.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

no comments??

I think these are great
nice work

Very cute couple and these are fun shots!

Not too bad. WB seems to be changing all over the place, but I like the composition of a lot of these. Personally, I like to move the other person farther back on those single DOF shots, but that's just personal preference. You are going to rock their wedding.

Thanks all.

Mr,itchy- the wb is not what is changing. Just differing processing styles. Thanks for the comment.

i like the pics.

The cinema one was cute

Thanks Lukeyson I appreciate it.

My bad. I was looking more at like 4 and 5. Looks like the same editing style, but that 5 has more warmth on it.

I love these!!! Awesome job!!!! I love #3 the most

terrific set

mritchy wrote in post #11352289
My bad. I was looking more at like 4 and 5. Looks like the same editing style, but that 5 has more warmth on it.

No worries. I took two different styles to those. Even if they look same.

Free2BeMePhotography wrote in post #11354852
I love these!!! Awesome job!!!! I love #3 the most

Nmahooch wrote in post #11354872
terrific set

Thanks, I appreciate it.

Ida whitened the teeth in 8, that dark background makes them more apparent..

good job i like them

I think they aren't bad but the processing is taking them down from what they could be. I am not a fan of having like a dozen types of processing in one session. For example in #4 both of their skin tones look super pink. I think they'd all look better with some nice, clean processing. Also.. your watermark is a bit distracting, but I know some photographers prefer that with the fear of being stolen lol.

auroraskye wrote in post #11363637
I think they aren't bad but the processing is taking them down from what they could be. I am not a fan of having like a dozen types of processing in one session. For example in #4 both of their skin tones look super pink. I think they'd all look better with some nice, clean processing. Also.. your watermark is a bit distracting, but I know some photographers prefer that with the fear of being stolen lol.

I agree with this 99%. I don't find the size of your watermark distracting. I think you should make a separate watermark for your portrait work.
The processing isn't bad, but I find the skin tones ranging back and forth are distracting.
Good poses though and not a bad set for a sports shooter.